Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering

Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering









Microsoft founder Bill Gates continues to pour
millions of dollars into high-risk geoengineering projects that purport
to offer a solution to global warming yet have been savaged by
environmentalists as potentially posing a greater threat than climate
change itself.






“Concern is now growing that the small but
influential group of scientists, and their backers, may have a
disproportionate effect on major decisions about geoengineering
research and policy,” reports the London Guardian,
quoting critics who allege that Gates’ funding has enabled
geoengineering advocates to “dominate the deliberations of the UN’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”


In 2010, Gates was criticized
for ploughing $300,000 dollars into a sea trial of cloud-whitening
technology which involved spraying clouds with microscopic particles in
an effort to make them reflect more sunlight, an experiment dubbed
“dangerous” by environmental campaigners.
The
report reveals that Gates has backed Professors David Keith, of Harvard
University, and Ken Caldeira of Stanford, to the tune of $4.6 million
dollars to fund studies based around the premise of injecting sulphur
particles into the upper atmosphere designed to reflect sunlight.


As we have previously documented,
experiments similar to Caldeira’s proposal are already being carried
out by U.S. government -backed scientists, such as those at the U.S.
Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in
Aiken, S.C, who in 2009 began conducting studies which involved shooting
huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass
microspheres,” into the stratosphere.
Exposure
to sulphur has been linked to innumerable physical and neurological
diseases, including reproductive failure, behavioral changes, damage to
the immune system, as well as liver, heart and stomach disorders.
Even
pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits that injecting
sulphur into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain, ozone depletion
or weather pattern disruption.”


Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock
also, “created computer simulations indicating that sulfate clouds
could potentially weaken the Asian and African summer monsoons,
reducing rain that irrigates the food crops of billions of people.”


The Guardian report reveals that Gates’ money is
being spent by the scientists involved on lobbying governments to
provide huge public funding for massive geoengineering experiments,
despite opposition from prominent environmentalists who warn that the
potential dangers are immense.


“The eco-clique are lobbying for a huge
injection of public funds into geoengineering research. They dominate
virtually every inquiry into geoengineering. They are present in almost
all of the expert deliberations. They have been the leading advisers
to parliamentary and congressional inquiries and their views will, in
all likelihood, dominate the deliberations of the UN’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as it grapples for the
first time with the scientific and ethical tangle that is climate
engineering,” said Clive Hamilton, professor of Public Ethics at the
Australian National University.


Increasing awareness of the chemtrail phenomenon
has led many to speculate that massive geoengineering projects are
already underway.


In 2008, a KSLA news investigation
found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude
chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm)
as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium,
cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some
are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.


The newscast focuses on Barium, which its
research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels
in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set
by the EPA.” The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very unusual,” but
commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter” in its
discussion with KSLA.
The lucrative push for research grants related to geoengineering remains intense despite new figures from the UK Met Office
and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit confirming
that the planet has not warmed since 1997 and in fact the real climate
threat could be the onset of a new ice age.


Source:-
http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-pours-millions-into-geoengineering/

https://chemtrailawareness.forumotion.co.uk
http://vaccinesdonotwork.blogspot.com/