The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment

The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment









The Associated Press reports today that the Obama
administration has held discussions regarding the possibility of
“geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by
“shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the
sun’s rays.” However, such programs are already being conducted by
government-affiliated universities, government agencies, and on a mass
scale through chemtrail spraying.


The AP report
states that Obama’s science advisor John Holdren is pushing for
radical terra forming programs to be explored such as creating an
“artificial volcano”. Despite Holdren’s admission that such measures
could have “grave side effects,” he added that, “we might get
desperate enough to want to use it.”
“Holdren, a
65-year-old physicist, is far from alone in taking geoengineering more
seriously. The National Academy of Science is making climate
tinkering the subject of its first workshop in its new multidiscipline
climate challenges program. The British parliament has also discussed
the idea,” reports AP.

“The
American Meteorological Society is crafting a policy statement on
geoengineering that says “it is prudent to consider geoengineering’s
potential, to understand its limits and to avoid rash deployment.”

However, a study of past and ongoing upper atmosphere aerosol programs
confirms that the government has been active in this field for years.

The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program was created in
1989 with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and is
sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Science and managed by the Office of
Biological and Environmental Research.
One of ARM’s programs, entitled Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC), is aimed at measuring “cloud simulations” and “aerosol retrievals”.

Another program under the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program
is directed towards, “developing comprehensive understanding of the
atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and
fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter.”

The DOE website states that, “The current focus of the program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate:
aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect
direct and indirect influences on climate and climate change.”


U.S. government scientists are already bombarding the
skies with the acid-rain causing pollutant sulphur dioxide in an
attempt to fight global warming by “geo-engineering” the planet,
despite the fact that injecting aerosols into the upper atmosphere
carries with it a host of both known and unknown dangers.


The
proposal to disperse sulphur dioxide in an attempt to reflect
sunlight was discussed in a September 2008 London Guardian article
entitled, Geoengineering: The radical ideas to combat global warming,
in which Ken Caldeira, a leading climate scientist based at the
Carnegie Institution in Stanford, California, promoted the idea of
injecting the atmosphere with aerosols.
“One
approach is to insert “scatterers” into the stratosphere,” states the
article. “Caldeira cites an idea to deploy jumbo jets into the upper
atmosphere and deposit clouds of tiny particles there, such as sulphur
dioxide. Dispersing around 1m tonnes of sulphur dioxide per year
across 10m square kilometres of the atmosphere would be enough to
reflect away sufficient amounts of sunlight.”


Experiments
similar to Caldeira’s proposal are already being carried out by U.S.
government -backed scientists, such as those at the U.S. Department of
Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, who last year began conducting studies
which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this
case “porous-walled glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere.


The
project is closely tied to an idea by Nobel Prize winner Paul
Crutzen, who “proposed sending aircraft 747s to dump huge quantities
of sulfur particles into the far-reaches of the stratosphere to cool
down the atmosphere.”


Such programs merely
scratch the surface of what is likely to be a gargantuan and
overarching black-budget funded project to geo-engineer the planet,
with little or no care for the unknown environmental consequences this
could engender.


What is known about what happens
when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide is bad enough,
since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA
“Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the
damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above
2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain
accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including
irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our
nation’s cultural heritage.”
The health effects
of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to raise
serious questions about whether such programs should even be allowed
to proceed.


The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.
- Neurological effects and behavioral changes- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism

According to the LennTech website,
“Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can
cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the
kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur
can cause foetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry
sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk. Finally,
sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.”


Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental
Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns
that the consequences of tinkering with the planet’s delicate
eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.“If you do this on a
continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all
kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid,” said Singer.


Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist – a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation – Doug Parr has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.


Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who recently proposed
a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would
be used to block out the Sun, admits that geo-engineering could cause
“conflicts between nations if geoengineering projects go wrong.”

Given
all the immediate dangers associated with bombarding the atmosphere
with sulphur dioxide, along with the unknown dangers of other
geo-engineering projects, many people are concerned that “chemtrails”
are a secret component of the same agenda to alter the Earth’s
eco-system.



This
graphic proposes, “Spraying aluminum powder and barium oxide into
high levels of the atmosphere, again delivered by aircraft, to increase
planetary reflectance (albedo) and cloud cover.” High levels of
barium have been found in substances associated with chemtrails.


Reports of chemtrails, jet plumes emitted from planes
that hang in the air for hours and do not dissipate, often blanketing
the sky in criss-cross patterns, have increased dramatically over the
last 10 years. Many have speculated that they are part of a
government program to alter climate, inoculate humans against certain
pathogens, or even to toxify humans as part of a population reduction
agenda.


In conducting Google searches, one finds discussion, such as this example, of using sulphur dioxide as a jet fuel additive to be dispersed over the world during routine commercial flights.
“I
suggest that both the sulphur dioxide and the silica particles could
be delivered into the stratosphere by dissolving an additive in jet
aviation fuel,” writes engineer John Gorman, who has conducted
experiments to test the feasibility of such a scenario.
“We
would want to burn fuel containing the additive specifically when the
aircraft was cruising in the lower stratosphere,” he adds.


Earlier this year, KSLA news investigation
found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude
chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm)
as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic,
chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are
metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in
nature.
The newscast focuses on Barium, which
its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium
levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic
level set by the EPA.” The Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very unusual,”
but commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter” in its
discussion with KSLA.


KSLA also asked Mark
Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of
Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can
lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term
exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center
further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful
substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many
speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.


Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from suspected geoengineering experimentation.
KSLA
also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical context,
citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed in 1977
Senate hearings. The tests included experimenting with biochemical
compounds on the public. KSLA reports that “239 populated areas were
contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.”


One
of the accepted truisms of scientific study is the fact that if
scientists are proposing an idea, then those scientists with access to
the bottomless pit of black-budget secret government funding are
already doing it.


It is highly likely that
chemtrails are merely one manifestation of “geo-engineering” that is
taking place without proper debate, notification or any form of
legality, and with a callous disregard for the potential dangers to
both our health and our environment.

Source:-
http://www.infowars.com/the-government-is-already-geo-engineering-the-environment/


http://vaccinesdonotwork.blogspot.com/