Admin
Admin
Posts : 8049
Join date : 2012-05-29
Location : Manchester UK
 |  Subject: Dangerous Banned Vaccine Repackaged and Given New Name  Wed 03 Oct 2012, 17:56 | |
| Dangerous Banned Vaccine Repackaged and Given New NameYet again the UK government has allowed a previously banned and dangerous v vaccine onto the UK market, by repackaging it and giving it a new name in a b bid to deceive parents.
The first
time the UK government tried this tactic and succeeded was in 1988 when
the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunizations) sanctioned
the MMR vaccine Pluserix for use in the UK. Pluserix had previously been
banned in Canada, causing thousands of children to suffer irreversible
side effects as a result. This vaccine went on to cause the same
devastation in the UK. [1] A DANGEROUS VACCINEDr. Lucjia Tomljenovic
gave a full description of these devastating side effects, including
encephalitis, bilateral deafness and meningitis, in her paper The
vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on
Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): Are They at Odds? Appalled at the committee’s behavior, she exposed exactly what was being said behind the closed doors of UK’s JCVI. She wrote:“ Thus,
instead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety
concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI choose to support the existing
policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.” [2]One child
who became profoundly deaf in one ear after she received the now banned
vaccination, Katie Stephen, is still fighting for compensation to this
day. Her mother, Wendy Stephen, is furious at her daughter’s treatment
and told The Telegraph in a recent article: “She
wasn’t born this way. This was done to her by the Department of Health.
They distributed pamphlets arguing that this was the right thing to do
for your child, and not just that, but the right thing to do for herd
immunity in the UK against these three illnesses.” [3] Parents unknowingly subjected their child to a proven dangerous vaccine. Second Banned Vaccine Gets RevampObviously
not learning from the error of their ways, the UK government has once
again potentially put thousands of lives at risk by re-introducing a
banned, this time unlicensed vaccine onto the UK market. In June
2012, the single mumps vaccine Medi-Mumps cultured on dog kidney cells
was advertised for use at a number of private clinics as an alternative
option to the MMR. It has since been discovered however, that Medi-Mumps
is in fact the banned, unlicensed vaccine Pavivac. To cover this up,
just like the MMR vaccine Pluserix, the vaccine was repackaged and given
a new name. A SHOCKING DISCOVERYThrough
intensive research, we have learned that on September 13, 2012, the UK’s
MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency) wrote a
press release titled Advertising Investigations. The MHRA wrote:“ 13 September 2012The
MHRA was made aware of information presented on the Children’s
Immunisation Centre (CIC) website about Medi-Mumps and a related press
release. The MHRA was concerned that the information provided an
unbalanced view of the safety and efficacy of the vaccine because it did
not mention the MHRA’s concerns and previous CSM advice or that the product was unlicensed. (emphasis added)We
understood that the Medi-Mumps vaccine is manufactured from the same
stock and processed in the same way as Pavivac mumps vaccine.
(emphasis added) The MHRA, acting on advice from an independent
advisory committee, the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), has for a
number of years objected to the importation of the Pavivac product
because there is insufficient information available to assure its
safety, quality and efficacy. See statement from the committee on safety of medicines (82Kb) for more details.CIC amended the websites to remove the information about Medi-Mumps.Date case raised: 3 April 2012 Date action agreed: 2 May 2012 Date of publication: 13 September 2012” [4]DON’T SAY WE DIDN’T WARN YOUAmazingly in May of this year on this very site, I wrote an article titled New Vaccine Made From Dog Cells May Trigger Allergy to Dogs.
[5] My article highlighted the fact that a new single mumps vaccine had
been slipped into private clinics in the UK through the back door.I
highlighted that the Medi-Mumps vaccine had been advertised as being
available from June 2012 in two private clinics, The Children’s
Immunization Centre, who have now removed the vaccine in question from
their listings [6] and The Early Onset Clinic who, at the time of this
writing, are still advertising it as available today. [7] I queried
whether or not that the new vaccine could possibly be the banned vaccine
Pavivac repackaged and re introduced as a new product:“Interestingly
Medi-Mumps is extremely similar to the banned vaccine Pavivac. The
Pavivac vaccine was also manufactured in the Czech Republic and cultured
on canine kidney cells but this vaccine was rejected by the CSM
(Committee on the Safety of Medicines) in 2002 because of safety
concerns.”[8] My research was spot on and once again, vactruth.com can be proven to promote child health safety.CONCLUSIONI would
like to know just how these private clinics managed to get this so
wrong. Did they not realize that they were and still are, in some cases,
advertising and injecting very young children with an unlicensed,
previously banned product? Do they also not realize that it has been
illegal to advertise unlicensed products to the public since 2010? [9]How can we,
as healthcare consumers, ever trust our governments if they continue to
sanction dangerous, banned and unlicensed products for use on our
children? These are only two products that we now know about. How many
other banned, unlicensed drugs, vaccines and healthcare products are
being recommended for use that are repackaged and renamed?
Source:-http://vactruth.com/2012/09/24/dangerous-vaccine-repackaged/ | |
|
Calendar