Charles' Connections to Pedophilia Networks

The Prince and the Pedophile: Charles' Connections to Pedophilia Networks

Image source

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post


Fresh on the heels of the fallout from revelations
regarding former BBC entertainer Jimmy Savile and his unbelievably
sickening and innumerable instances of child molestation as well as the
“look the other way” approach taken by the BBC, more and more questions
are now emerging in regards to the connection between Savile and British
Royalty, most notably Prince Charles.

At least, more questions should be emerging.

Unfortunately, however, the British mainstream media is deeming Prince
Charles and the rest of his ilk in positions of power and perceived
genetic royalty as if they are beyond reproach. This approach is typical
and to be expected, yet it is also highly ironic considering the fact
that such is the same position the mainstream media took with the
allegations against Jimmy Savile for so many years.

As a result of the Savile affair, mainstream outlets, particularly the
BBC, now have a lot of egg on their faces in the areas of credibility
and respect.In short, any connections placing Prince Charles in an
uncompromising position regarding his connections with Savile or his
potential for sharing a penchant for unnatural relationships with
children is being completely ignored if not officially covered up.

Although Prince Charles’ friendship with Jimmy Savile, allegedly begun when the two met in the 1970s
during the course of working with children’s wheelchair sports
charities, is now well-known, the extent to which the Prince and the
Pedophile were connected appears to go much deeper than the mainstream
media reports let on.


Of course, the two having come in contact at a “charity” event for the
disabled is not too far-fetched, even if it is being reported by
corporate outlets. After all, using children’s “charities” as a hunting
ground and a cover for his true motives was a notorious method used by
Savile who actually lived in children’s homes and hospitals
so as to be closer to his victims. This method is by no means specific
to Savile, however, as many other sexual predators and pedophiles know
exactly what areas of society to be involved in and what careers to
pursue in order to gain access to their victims. Jerry Sandusky stands
as a perfect example.

Clarence House, Prince Charles’ spokesman, declined comment on much of
the relationship between Savile and Charles, only claiming that the
relationship was mostly a result of their “shared interest in supporting
disability charities.”

Supporting charities, indeed.

Of course, Savile was doing much more than “supporting disability
charities.” That is, unless one places serial child rape in a much
different category than the average person might. Indeed, one would not
be judged out of place to question whether or not untold numbers of
sexually assaulted children thoroughly cancels out any financial
“support” that may have been given in the past. Apparently, in the view
of British royalty, it does not.

In fact, child molester Savile has enjoyed an unbelievable level of access to the Royal Family for the past 40 years.

For instance, in the late 1980s, Savile was said to have acted as a type of marriage counselor
between Charles and Diana, visiting their residence several times. At
these visits, Dickie Arbiter, who took care of media relations for the
Prince and Princess between 1988 and 2000 stated that, at these visits,
Savile’s behavior was uncouth to say the very least.

Arbiter stated,
<blockquote class="tr_bq">He would walk into the office and do the
rounds of the young ladies taking their hands and rubbing his lips all
the way up their arms if they were wearing short sleeves. If it was
summer [and their arms were bare] his bottom lip would curl out and he
would run it up their arms. This was at St James's Palace. The women
were in their mid to late 20s doing typing and secretarial work.</blockquote>Not
only that, but Savile was brought in to the private marital affairs of
the Royals once again in order to help the Duchess of York, Sarah
Ferguson, in matters which were not disclosed to the public. Savile
later claimed he was brought in to help “Fergie” keep her profile down.


Obviously, the relationship forged between Charles and Savile went far
beyond two men who merely performed charity work for the same
organizations. This can be evidenced by the fact that, in 1990, Charles
even consulted Savile for advice on the appointment of a senior aide for himself and Princess Diana.

The relationship between Charles and Savile, particularly Savile’s
access to the Royal Family’s affairs and the respect which was afforded
Savile in this regard, has confused many onlookers. After all, Savile
was nothing more than a BBC presenter and disc jockey who was well past
his prime. Not to mention the fact that Savile was well known as an
uncontrollable freak, although many were under the impression that
Savile’s television persona was merely part of his schtick.

Yet the clues to the Prince’s friendship with the Pedophile might have
more to do with similar interests in entertainment than a mere
happenstance relationship. Although the evidence which connects Prince
Charles to pedophilia is nowhere near as documented as that of Jimmy
Savile, a trail of information certainly seems to be leading in that
direction.

At this point, it should be mentioned that, although the official line
is that Savile and Charles met in the 1970s as part of the coincidence
of mutual charity work, Savile himself has stated that he was friends
with the Royal family “for a million years.” In fact, it was reported
that Savile actually stated he was introduced to the Royals in 1966 by
Lord Mountbatten, a known pedophile and sexual pervert. In addition to Mountbatten, however, Greg Hallett, in his book Hitler Was A British Agent,
also names Prince Philip as a pedophile.In reference to how he became
introduced and ingratiated with the Royal family, Savile stated,
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Coming from Lord Louis, who was the favourite
uncle of Prince Philip, that was quite something. So obviously I hooked
up with the Prince – what was good enough for Lord Louis was good enough
for him.</blockquote>So, already, we have Savile, a notorious pedophile
linked to other individuals of the Royal Family named as pedophiles as
well. Prince Philip, of course, is Prince Charles’ father. Lord
Mountbatten is largely considered Charles’ mentor.

Savile
was indeed close to British Royals as well as other elites for many
years. It seems his qualification for such high connections were mainly
due to his ability to obtain children for the twisted appetites of those
considered beyond reproach for the mainstream media and, unfortunately,
the general public.

Savile himself seemed to hint at this possibility in an interview conducted with Esquire where he stated, “The thing about me is I get things done and I work deep cover.”

Savile’s ridiculous television show (created for the sole purpose of
enhancing his access to children) was thus appropriately named, Jimmy’ll Fix It. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the public were completely unaware as to what he was fixing and who he was fixing it for.

Essentially, it is clear that Jimmy Savile was a procurer of children
not only for himself but also for wealthy pedophiles all across the
world, particularly in Britain. Even Savile’s own nephew has recently gone public with information
tying Savile to a network of pedophiles and sick sexual parties where
children were repeatedly raped. Guy Marsden, Savile’s nephew, also
stated that the parties were attended by household names in show
business.

However, as is being widely reported in the news, Savile’s escapades of
pedophilia were by no means limited to parties with the elite of
entertainment. Many of his attacks on children took place in the halls
of the hospitals and charities he helped fund and operate, even residing
in his own personal room at two of these institutions. At this point,
it is worth noting that Savile and Prince Charles are open “supporters”
of the same charities.

Apparently, Prince Charles and the Pedophile did have some similar
tastes, some of which were even reported by the mainstream media. In
1999, after the Prince accepted Savile’s invitation to a private meal at
Savile’s home in Glencoe, Scotland, Savile had arranged for three women
to parade around dressed in pinafores, a type of dress without sleeves
and an open back that is often worn over other dresses. Interestingly
enough, pinafores were often worn by children.

After the dinner, Charles wrote Savile a Christmas Card with a note that
read, “Jimmy, with affectionate greetings from Charles. Give my love to
your ladies in Scotland.”

Of course, the mainstream is certain that Charles is referring to the
local women brought in for the Royal entertainment. However, unless the
hired help made an exceptional impression upon the mind of Charles, one
must wonder whether or not these particular ladies are the “ladies” to
which Charles is referring in his Christmas note. After all, Savile’s Scottish cottage was also the scene of much child abuse as well.

Later, Charles sent Savile a box of cigars and a pair of gold cufflinks
on his 80th birthday along with another note that cryptically read,
“Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country Jimmy. This
is to go some way in thanking you for that.” Fortunately, many are now
aware of what Jimmy has done for his country. Clearly, it would be best
if they are given the full story along with it.

This is not likely to happen, however, as global pedophile rings are generally made up of some of the most elite individuals
the world over. This is particularly relevant when it comes to any
questions regarding the behavior of the Royal Prince. At any moment when
there is a chance that information might be leaked that would be
damaging to the reputation of genetic royalty, the documents are sealed,
the whistleblowers are dealt with, and the controversy covered up.

Some have even speculated
that Princess Diana sealed her own fate after threatening to reveal
networks of pedophilia within the Royal family. Indeed, Diana did speak of “dark forces” and members of an “organization” that were monitoring her shortly before her death.

For instance, when it appeared that the so-called Black Spider Memos,
a series of letters written by Charles to government ministers, would
damage the perception of Charles’ impartiality if he were to become
king, then memos were immediately blocked by the British government.
Indeed, it would be extremely interesting to see the contents of the
letters, since, in reality, the impartiality of the king is truly
irrelevant in the grand scheme of British society and government.

What is particularly interesting is that the letters are being blocked
from release now, as the biggest pedophilia scandal in British history
is unfolding - specifically, at a time when one of the main focal points
of the scandal, Jimmy Savile, was a close friend of the Prince. Even
more so, it comes at a time when British government officials are also being implicated in pedophilia networks.

For those who may still be under the impression that pedophilia is a
crime beyond the capabilities of British politicians, take a look at
this partial compilation of British politicians convicted of pedophilia in recent years.

But, while the connections between Prince Charles and the Pedophile
Jimmy Savile are themselves enough to make one wonder, the fact is that
Savile is not the only relationship with a potential pedophile that
Charles has maintained.

As reported by the Digital Journal,
the Right Reverend Peter Ball, who is thought to be “the most senior
member of the Church of England,” was recently been arrested in
connection to a child sexual abuse case. Ball was arrested
on eight suspected cases of abuse against boys and young men ranging
from ages 12 to 20 during the 1980s to 1990s. Ball, who was the former
Bishop of Gloucester, resigned in 1993 after he was served with a police
caution for “committing an act of gross indecency against a teenager.”

Upon his resignation, Ball retired to Manor Lodge, “a wisteria-clad
property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall.” Manor Lodge is the private
estate of Prince Charles.

In reference to his new living arrangements, Ball stated, “He (Prince
Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house.
The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has
been through horrific times and is a great person.”

Considering
the connections and personal friendships maintained by Prince Charles,
one must question whether or not Charles himself has had some experience
in the underworld of pedophilia. At the very least, the Prince is the
absolute worst judge of character who ever lived.

What is also very interesting regarding the people named in these child
sex scandals and the scope of the scandals themselves, is that the
individuals who have been trying their best to bring this information to
light have been ignored and derided for years on end. This has been the
case whether the individuals were whistleblowers, researchers, or even
victims themselves.

For instance, while much of mainstream Britain has had quite a time
laughing at David Icke, suddenly his claims do not seem so fantastic and
funny after all. Indeed, it was Icke who mentioned the global cabal of
pedophiles and even many of the participants in them by name many years
ago. While his voice was scarcely heard above the laughter at the time,
he is, at the very least, on the record as having exposed these networks
early on.

As for Icke’s remarks regarding the scandal today, he had this to say on November 7, 2012.
<blockquote class="tr_bq">This guy, William Hague, the foreign
Secretary, needs to be questioned on why that Welsh inquiry into the
massive pedophilia in Welsh children’s homes was given the brief that it
did and therefore stopped these kids from talking about what happened
to them. And this is the big thing. If the police investigation does not
knock on the door of Buckingham Palace over this whole Savile [case]
and the wider implications that have followed then it’s a cover up.
Because the British Royal family are fundamentally involved in this
right to the top. Right up to the people like Prince Philip and all
these other people . . . . . This man [Savile] was an aging sleazy disc
jockey, right? And he had complete access to the British Royal family
AND they used him as an official go-between [with] Prince Charles and
Princess Diana when they were falling out in their marriage. And now
it’s come out this week that he was advising Prince Charles on aids to
employ. Why is this man so close or was so close to the British Royal
Family? The answer to that will bring the British Royal family down.</blockquote>Considering
Icke’s accuracy in terms of information on this particular issue,
perhaps it would be wise if those who heard him speak years ago might
take him a little more serious the second time around.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/11/the-prince-and-pedophile-charles.html