Hospitalizations and Mortality Rates Regarding Vaccines

Pretty Damning Statistics: Hospitalizations and Mortality Rates Regarding Vaccines

Dees Illustration

Catherine J. Frompovich, ContributorActivist Post

After Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
(PL99-660) in 1986, a postmarketing safety surveillance program called Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS) was set in place in 1990 to collect information about adverse
events or side effects attributed to vaccines licensed and administered
in the United States.

Since VAERS' inception, over 350,000 adverse reports have been reported.
However, only 13% of all reports were considered serious reactions
that included life-threatening conditions, permanent disability, or even
death, according to GS Goldman and NZ Miller who investigated and
statistically analyzed the VEARS database for the years 1990 to 2010.

Quoting from the Goldman-Miller paper “Relative trend in
hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine
doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS), 1990-2010" published in Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2012 31:1012 orginally published online 24 April, 2012. The online version of this article can be found at http://het.sagepub.com/content/31/10/1012
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Some infants might be more likely to
experience an adverse reaction due to biochemical or synergistic
toxicity associated with concurrent administration of multiple vaccines.
Yet, studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or
efficacy) of administering multiple vaccine doses during a single
physician visit based on the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule.</blockquote>The
above statement, I think, most science-based individuals ought to find
totally and outrageously appalling, i.e., no studies have been conducted
to determined the safety or efficacy of administering up to nine (9)
vaccines into a little 2, 4, or 6 month old baby, especially since
medicine, Big Pharma, and the CDC/FDA consider themselves to be
operating within the rudiments of science. How patently stupid is that?
Furthermore, real science would be demanding such efficacy and safety
studies be performed, analyzed, and vetted BEFORE automatically
implementing such practices based solely on ‘convenience’ for parents.


It must be noted that in 1990 children received a total of 15 doses of
vaccines in their first year of life, whereas by 2007, 26 vaccines were
CDC-prescribed for a child’s first year of life. The vaccines that
infants would receive in combination at one visit include polio,
hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, rotavirus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and pneumococcal for a total of eight ( vaccine doses—never tested for safety and efficacy.

In 2011 Goldman and Miller published another study stating that among
developed nations, “infant mortality increased with an increase in the
number of vaccine doses.” [1]

Furthermore, researcher G Delong published a 2011 paper wherein he
reported that “the higher the proportion of children receiving
recommended vaccinations, the higher the prevalence of autism or speech
and language impairment.” [2]

Another 2011 research study by Oestergaard MZ, et al. found that infants
who received the Hepatitis B vaccine either as a newborn or as a
neonate were predisposed to more hospitalizations and deaths than older
infants. [3]

Goldman
and Miller also state in their current paper that there are seven
previously published studies giving evidence of correlation between the
Hepatitis B vaccine and serious adverse reactions, which include
pediatric multiple sclerosis.

Currently, Goldman and Miller found
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Cases that specified either hospitalization or
death were identified among infants, defined as children aged less than
1 year, for whom reports were filed in the VAERS database from 1990
through the end of 2010.</blockquote>The study’s authors downloaded
327,331 VAERS case reports of which they statistically analyzed 298,614
case reports of individuals aged less than 100 years. In their report
they explain why they used that number of cases. Of the 298,614 cases
13.1% or 39,082 were infant cases. Of that number, 99.3% or 38,801
infant cases were reported as receiving fewer than 9 vaccine doses
concurrently and were available for analyses, which showed 6,279
hospitalizations for children less than one year old and 1,881 deaths.
The number of deaths reported occurred as follows:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">1,623 deaths in children ages 0.0 year to less
than 0.5 year of age or less than six (6) months old out of 26,408 case
reports or 6.1% </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">258 deaths in
children ages 0.5 year to 0.9 year of age or less than eleven (11)
months old out of 12,393 case reports or 2.1% </blockquote>What was the gender distribution relating to those deaths?
<blockquote class="tr_bq">1,133 were males: 984 under six (6) months old and 149 under eleven (11) months old

723 were females: 617 under six (6) months old and 106 under eleven (11) months old

25 case reports had no gender designation </blockquote>The damning part
about this information is that the VAERS database reports probably
represent only the tip of the proverbial iceberg when it comes to
reporting vaccine adverse events. To illustrate what I mean, former FDA
Commissioner David Kessler said, “Only about one percent of serious
events are reported.” OMG!

Back in August of 2012, I published the article A Parent’s Guide: What to do if your child dies after vaccination, which parents and legal guardians may find helpful, available at
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/a-parents-guide-what-to-do-if-your.html#more

Because of the numerous industrial-type chemicals, antigens,
neurotoxins, preservatives, stabilizers, and inactivating chemicals,
e.g., formaldehyde/Formalin, glutaraldehyde, and polyoxyethylene, combined in each vaccine thereby causing cumulative toxic buildup,
it’s incomprehensible why medical science does not perform safety and
efficacy studies on multi-valent vaccines; that the CDC/FDA do not
mandate those studies be performed; or why Congress, who gave vaccine
makers carte blanche protecting them from being liable for damage from vaccines,
doesn’t require safety and efficacy studies on multiple vaccine
injections at one time. Or, perhaps the EPA or even OSHA should become
involved because of all the chemicals used in making vaccines.

Goldman
and Miller’s current study of the VAERS reporting system validates such
studies are needed without delay. What every healthcare consumer ought
to be asking is whether CDC/FDA really are remiss in their charters to
protect the public’s health, especially infants and children, when they
encourage and mandate Frankenstein-like vaccination mandates as public
health policy. What parent would put formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum
or any of vaccines’ toxic chemicals into his or her child, especially
those from 6 to 9 vaccines at one time?

Furthermore, parents ought to be seriously concerned why the American
Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently supported the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) claim that mercury [Hg] ought to remain in
vaccines. For confirmation of that, please see the December 17, 2012
AAP release “AAP Endorses WHO Statement on Thimerosal in Vaccines” [4], when on the FDA’s current [12/29/12] website [5] this appears:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">As a precautionary measure, the Public Health
Service (including the FDA, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Center
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics
issued two Joint Statements, urging vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal in vaccines as soon as possible
(CDC 1999) and (CDC 2000). The U.S. Public Health Service agencies have
collaborated with various investigators to initiate further studies to
better understand any possible health effects from exposure to
thimerosal in vaccines. [CJF Emphasis added] </blockquote>Note: Mercury in Thimerosal is 49.6% ethyl mercury. It also should be noted that the toxicity of ethyl mercury is NOT well studied. Interesting? For those who want to know more about the mercury in vaccines cover-up, I heartily suggest reading The Simpsonwood Conference: Mercury-Autism Coverup! by Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=188274776746 , which my co-editor and I included in our January 2011 monograph, Vaccines & Vaccinations: The Need For Congressional Investigation.

CDC/FDA and AAP need to support factual science and biochemistry about mercury in any form. Mercury in any form still is Hg!

Quoting from the link below,
<blockquote class="tr_bq">It [Hg] may cause headaches, trouble sleeping,
personality change, memory loss, irritability, indecisiveness and loss
of intelligence. </blockquote>http://www.elcosh.org/document/1618/d000541/Mercury%2BFact%2BSheet.html?gclid=CLvyzYSqwLQCFSXNOgod9UYAbw

Perchance, do any of the problems mercury can cause resemble anything on the Autism Spectrum Disorder syndrome?

MedicineNet.com’s website about mercury
mentions that Thimerosal [49.6% Hg] is only in flu vaccines. So why
mandate children 6 months and older AND pregnant women with growing
fetuses receive the flu shot? Prenatal advice is given about eating fish
containing mercury during pregnancy because mercury could affect the
developing fetus. And a flu shot’s mercury doesn’t? What kind of cockamamie science or pseudo science is that?

Big Pharma’s world of vaccinology would come crashing down like a house
of cards if medicine had to retract its position on mercury in vaccines.
That’s probably why pseudo science will prevail regarding vaccines,
especially in light of the Simpsonwood meeting in June 2000, out of
which came the following:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">After the Simpsonwood gathering, the CDC
also instructed the Institute of Medicine (IOM), i.e., the National
Academy of Sciences, to produce a new study with contrived results: no
correlation between thimerosal and brain disorders. According to Dr.
Marie McCormick, who chaired the IOM’s Immunization Safety Review
Committee in January 2001, the CDC 'wants us to declare, well, that
these things are pretty safe.' In fact, 'we are not ever going to come
down that [autism] is a true side effect' of thimerosal. In
transcripts of the meeting, the committee’s chief staffer, Kathleen
Stratton, predicted that the IOM would conclude that the evidence was
'inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation' between thimerosal
and autism. Apparently, that was what 'Walt wants'—a reference to Dr.
Walter Orenstein, director of the CDC’s National Immunization Program.
by Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute [CJF emphasis added ] https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=188274776746 </blockquote>Perhaps that’s why VAERS will be nothing more than a database no one takes seriously.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/pretty-damning-statistics.html