New report highlights ethics and policy dangers of 'military human enhancements'

New report highlights ethics and policy dangers of 'military human enhancements'

DARPA's Warrior Web

Madison Ruppert, Contributor
Activist Post

The U.S. military’s constant move towards increasing so-called “human
enhancements” or, as California Polytechnic State University researcher
Patrick Lin says, “mutant powers,” has raised entirely novel ethical and
policy concerns, according to a new report for the Greenwall
Foundation.


Massive advances in technology are requiring a radical re-thinking of the future of war in other areas as well, such as weaponized hallucinations, fully automated weapons systems (also known as “killer robots”) and rapidly advancing drone technology opening up the realistic possibility of perpetual drone flight.

Yet this type of research aimed at directly changing human body – in an
effort to build what some call “super soldiers – is in a league of its
own. The military’s “enhancements” cover a wide range of technologies
from drugs and nutrition to genetic manipulation to electroshock to
robotic implants, prosthetics and more.

In a new 108-page report
prepared for the Greenwall Foundation by Patrick Lin, PhD, Maxwell
Mehlman, JD and Keith Abney ABD, the many risks are outlined along with
some of the many “human enhancement projects recently or currently
pursued by militaries worldwide.”

“Insomuch as the US military is the most transparent about its research
projects as well as the most heavily invested, most but not all of our
examples are projects based in US, drawn from open-source or
unclassified information,” the researchers note.


Some of the technologies they outline include exoskeletons designed to
radically increase a soldier’s strength and endurance, external devices
designed to aid mobility and allow humans to scale walls like geckos and
spiders, liquid body armor and flexible fabrics capable of stiffening
into armor and “virtual capabilities” designed to prevent the soldier
from even being on the battlefield at all.

One such project is the “Avatar” program spearheaded by the Defense
Advance Research Project Agency (DARPA) aimed at creating “interfaces
and algorithms to enable a soldier to effectively partner with a
semi-autonomous bi-pedal machine and allow it to act as the soldier’s
surrogate.”

In addition there are efforts to increase “situational awareness”
through “better communication, data integration from different sources,
threat identification, coordinated efforts, and so on.”

Current projects include DARPA’s Cognitive Technology Threat Warning
System, a visual aid that employs a computer to instantly identify
threats that otherwise “warfighters might only subconsciously see, given
that only a fraction of our visual data is consciously registered.”

A similar project is DARPA’s Soldier Centric Imaging via Computational
Cameras, or SCENICC, which “seeks to develop electronic contact lenses”
to accomplish similar superhuman awareness.

While
caffeine has long been a staple in war as an attention stimulant, the
US military now uses amphetamines to “increase focus” although there are
quite obviously “possible serious side-effects.”

Indeed, in one case, it seems that the stimulants were at least
partially responsible for the deaths of four Canadian troops in
Afghanistan, as Danger Room notes.

“Case in point: On April 18, 2002, a pair of Air Force F-16 fighter
pilots returning from a 10-hour mission over Afghanistan saw flashes on
the ground 18,000 feet below them,” David Axe writes. “Thinking he and
his wingman were under fire by insurgents, Maj. Harry Schmidt dropped a
500-pound laser-guided bomb.”

The flashes were actually Canadian troops conducting a live-fire
training exercise and the Air Force eventually dropped criminal charges.
Schmidt told Chicago
magazine, “I don’t know what the effect was supposed to be. All I know
is something [was] happening to my body and brain” that could have
influenced his judgment.

Currently, the US and other militaries are “using or exploring the use
of modafinil and other drugs, which are already used illicitly to
enhance academic and workplace performance,” according to the report.

Even memory is a target of potential manipulation with DARPA’s Human
Assisted Neural Devices program, aimed at strengthening and restoring
memories. Other programs are focused on developing drugs and treatments
capable of erasing memories.

Programs are also aimed at using artificial intelligence to enhance decision-making and planning in military situations.

DARPA’s Deep Green, for instance, “automatically infers the commander’s
intent and produces a plan from the commander’s hand-drawn sketches to
facilitate rapid option creation, and plan recognition and understanding
capabilities ensure the commander’s intent is fully represented in the
system.”

DARPA is also researching enhanced learning methods with programs such
as “Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts, Accelerated Learning,
Education Dominance, Augmented Cognition, and Training Superiority
programs.”

Real-time language translation is another area of DARPA research with
programs like “Boundless Operational Language Translation (BOLT), Robust
Automatic Translation of Speech (RATS), TRANSTAC, and other programs.”

Communication with military systems is also an area of increased focus
with systems capable of facilitating “direct communication between pilot
and aircraft” and “projects [that] seek to enable communication through
thought alone, such as the brain-computer interface work—or “synthetic
telepathy”—funded by the US Army Research Office.”

There
are also programs focusing on specific senses such as telescoping
contact lenses, DARPA’s RealNose project aimed at mimicking a dog’s
sense of smell, a Canadian project aimed at filtering out “environmental
noises while enhancing verbal signals” and another Canadian project
seeking to develop “a tactile cueing system for pilots to detect motion
without visual or auditory cues.”

Even human metabolism is an area of military focus with DARPA’s Peak
Soldier Performance program aimed at “boost[ing] human endurance, both
physical and cognitive.” Dietary supplements like quercetin are “being
investigated for cognitive-enhancing effects under stress” as well.

“Relatedly, US and UK scientists are researching genetic and cellular
(mitochondrial) enhancements to enable soldiers to run for long
distances and to survive longer without food, e.g., as Alaskan sled dogs
are able,” the researchers add.

DARPA’s Crystalline Cellulose Conversion to Glucose (C3G) program is
aimed at eventually allowing soldiers to “eat otherwise indigestible
materials, such as grass.”

Avoiding that pesky thing called sleep is another focus of military
research with DARPA-funded research programs into “light and magnetic
therapies to safely maintain wakefulness.”

The list grows considerably when one considers so-called “dual-use
research” which includes “military-funded research projects in
therapeutics or healing” with dual-use applications as enhancements for
soldiers.

Areas of focus include research into stress, circulatory issues,
metabolism, toxins and radiation, prosthetics, diagnostics, drug
delivery systems and basic science which, oddly enough, includes DARPA’s “Living Foundries” program.

Every single area includes ethical, legal and policy considerations, all
of which are likely even greater than we think since this report relies
solely on publicly available information.


The researchers conclude that the Pentagon needs to begin working on a framework for military human enhancement immediately.

However, as is the case with drones, this technology might – and, one might argue, likely will – be used extensively without any formal rules, guidelines or legal frameworks in place.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/new-report-highlights-ethics-and-policy.html