Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses

Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses

The deaths of children from multiple vaccine doses can
only be called carnage. This study demonstrates that giving 5-8 doses
instead of 1-4 doses at a time has resulted in an extra 51,750 to
103,500 child deaths in the last 20 years.


Shocked Boy, by Piers Nye


by Heidi Stevenson

A new study using data from the US government’s Vaccine Adverse
Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows that the more vaccines given, the
more likely children will die or be hospitalized. The increased rates
are highly significant, with a 50% greater chance of death with doubling
the number of vaccines and more than 100% increase in
hospitalizations—that’s double the number of hospital visits!

VAERS is recognized to contain only a small percentage of all adverse vaccination events. As GS Goldman and NZ Miller point out,

<blockquote>[A] confidential study conducted by Connaught
Laboratories, a vaccine manufacturer, indicated that ‘‘a fifty-fold
under-reporting of adverse events’’ is likely. According to
David Kessler, former commissioner of the FDA, ‘‘only about one percent of serious events [adverse drug reactions] are reported.
</blockquote>
Thus, the increased mortality and hospitalization suffered by
children as a direct result of the aggressive vaccination schedule, with
as many as 9 vaccines given in one day, is a huge number of children.
If, according to the study’s report above, only 1 to 2 out of 100
adverse events is reported, then the numbers reported by VAERS need to
be multiplied by 50 to 100!

Nonetheless, as this study has demonstrated, significant information
about the hazards of vaccines can still be ascertained by running
statistical analyses of the data given.

The
graph on the right, produced by the study, displays the hospitalization
rate charted against the number of vaccines. The solid diagonal line
plots the linear regression calculated for the data. You can see that
it’s a close match for the specific number of hospitalizations for each
year.

The outlier references the hospitalizations for a single vaccine
dose. This is likely explained by a combination of factors. One is that
the earliest vaccines are generally given singly in the hospital shortly
after birth. Newborns are at greater risk. Also, many parents will
refuse to continue vaccinations, or will refuse multiple vaccines, after
an early severe reaction.

R² refers to the likelihood that the regression line is a good fit for the data. R²
of 0.91 is quite good. Perfect would be 1.00. Thus, it’s likely that
the graph is showing the reality: When the number of vaccine doses
increases, the number of hospitalizations increases dramatically, from
10% of VAERS reports with 2 doses to more than 20% with 8 doses.

Below is the table for the death rate by number of doses:

Interestingly,
the number of child deaths due to number of vaccine doses increases
dramatically with 5. The reasons for this are unknown, but it may have
to do with the particular vaccines given or simply be related to
additive effects of toxins in the vaccines. That wasn’t analyzed in this
report.

I’ve circled the salient data in red. They show the actual numbers of
reported deaths, the numbers of reports of adverse events, and the
rates of mortality for 1-4 vaccines added together and all adverse event
reports of 5-8 vaccines added together.

Note: In reviewing the figures, I
noted a possible small error. In my calculation, the circled 3.6%
mortality rate should be recorded as 3.5%. It’s probably nothing more
than a difference in method of rounding. I’ve written to the authors to ask about this and will report back on their response.

Update: Dr. Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D. responded quickly and frankly within a few hours:

Dear Heidi,

Yes, your calculation looks correct.
The paper went through several revisions and what I think happened is
that initially we showed the percentages accurate to the nearest
hundredths, so 3.546… was shown rounded to 3.55, then at some point we
decided to round only to the nearest tenths. Unfortunately, we likely
rounded the 3.55 to 3.6 when we should have gone back to the original
data. Sorry about that! Thank you for your find!

In looking at the table, it’s quite clear that something is going on
with increasing doses of vaccines given at the same time. You can see
that there’s a huge jump in mortality with the fourth vaccine, jumping
by a factor of 3.88, from 42 to 163 deaths. The statistical method of
reporting doesn’t clarify this fact, nor does it show that the increase
is almost as great with the fifth vaccine dose, from 163 to 523, 3.21
times more children dying.

The second four vaccine doses, 5-8, are resulting in 50% more deaths than the first four doses, 1-4.
When we also consider the likelihood that there are 50-100 times more
adverse reactions than reported, what this study reveals is frightening:

1,458 deaths at 5-8 doses – 423 deaths at 1-4 doses = 1,035 extra deaths for doubling the number of doses.

Multiply that by 50 and you have 51,750 extra deaths simply for giving 5-8 vaccine doses, instead of 1-4 doses, at one time.

If
the true underreporting is double that (only 1% adverse reactions
reported), then the real number of excess child deaths would be 103,500.

That’s only considering the deaths caused by the fifth through eighth
doses. It eliminates the deaths caused by the first four doses. Those
would add up to 21,150 if VAERS includes 2% of actual adverse effects,
and 42,300 if it includes 1%. Adding those numbers together gives us a
total of 145,800 children who’ve died as a direct result of vaccines
from 1990 to 2010.

This is carnage that can be laid directly at the doorstep of our aggressive vaccination program.

If you do want to have your children vaccinated, at least insist on
only single doses separated by enough time to assure that there’s no
cumulative effect. It’s clear from the evidence here that multiple
vaccine doses, which have become standard, are responsible for a huge
number of deaths in children.


Source:-
http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2013-01-13/medical-childrens-psych-journal-wont-retract-fraudulent-paxil-study/