Scientists Developing New Autism Vaccine

Scientists Developing New Autism Vaccine Ignoring Likely Cause, Pushing Pharma’s Agenda

some scientists believe vaccines can "cure" autism

Christina England
Activist Post

For many years the medical establishment has denied that the MMR vaccine
can cause autism, despite government papers stating that the MMR
vaccine can cause an SSPE-like syndrome, which many professionals
believe to be autism, the non-fatal form of SSPE. [1] Instead of
researching this link further, as one would expect, scientists from the
University of Guelph are developing a vaccine believed to alleviate
specific symptoms found to be associated with autism.

(SSPE or subacute sclerosing panencephalitis is a degenerative
neurological condition which affects a person’s behavior, memory and
coordination, leading to fits, blindness and eventually death.)

For years, doctors have been bombarding the systems of autistic children
with antibiotics to control the bacteria, clostridium bolteae, reported
to be found in abundance in the guts of autistic children. This
bacteria causes these children to suffer from constipation, diarrhea and
other gastrointestinal related problems.

Just Another Vaccine?

A paper written by Brittany Pequegnat, et al, states:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Individuals with autistic spectrum disorders
(ASDs) are likely to experience chronic gastrointestinal (GI)
irritations, such as constipation and diarrhea. GI disorders have a
demonstrably high correlation with ASD and current literature suggests
that it occurs with rates as high as 91.4% of patients. Of the ASD
patients affected, 75.6% suffer from diarrhea. Diarrheal irritations can
be extremely uncomfortable for a child and have been noted to have a
loose association with regressive autism. [2]</blockquote>
Ms. Pequegna continues by adding:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">In a small proof-of-principle intervention
trial, vancomycin was orally administered to severely autistic children
with chronic, persistent diarrhea, and short-term improvement of
symptoms was seen in 8 out of 10 children. However, these improvements
were not persistent, and once vancomycin was withdrawn, any behavioral
gains in these children were lost; in turn suggesting that microbial
dysbiosis was suppressed but not eliminated.</blockquote>In other words,
instead of studying existing papers and eliminating what is believed to
be a possible cause of autism, scientists have developed yet another
useless vaccine. Surely, it would have been more beneficial for
scientists to research what is actually causing autistic children to
have the overabundance of clostridium bolteae in their gut, rather than
develop yet another vaccine, which by their own admittance does not
work?

A Severely Flawed Study

Many parents believe that there are already too many vaccines, putting
young children at the potential risk of autism and associated disorders.
In a desperate bid to prove them wrong and to carry on the vaccination
drive, researchers Dr. Frank DeStefano and his colleagues from the CDC
(Centers for Disease Control) and Abt Associates published a fascinating
paper in the Journal of Pediatrics in March of this year.

Their paper discussed whether or not a high number of vaccines
administered at an early age caused autism. The researchers studied data
from 256 children with autism and compared it to the data from 752
children without autism (born from 1994 –1999). All of the children
studied came from three managed care facilities. The authors looked at
each child’s cumulative exposure to antigens, the substances in vaccines
that cause the body’s immune system to produce antibodies to fight
disease, and the maximum number of antigens each child received in a
single day of vaccination.

The paper states that researchers determined the total antigen numbers
by adding the number of different antigens in all vaccines each child
received in one day, as well as all vaccines each child received up to
two years of age. They found that the total antigens from vaccines
received by age two years and the maximum number received on a single
day was the same between children with and without ASD (autism spectrum
disorder).

The authors recognized that children receive more vaccines today then in
the late 1990s and took this fact into consideration. However, they
stated that vaccines in the late 1990s contained more antigens than they
do today. The authors concluded that:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">An infant’s immune system is capable of
responding to a large amount of immunologic stimuli and, from time of
birth, infants are exposed to hundreds of viruses and countless antigens
outside of vaccination … The possibility that immunological stimulation
from vaccines during the first 1 or 2 years of life could be related to
the development of ASD is not well-supported by what is known about the
neurobiology of ASDs. In 2004, a comprehensive review by the Institute
of Medicine concluded that there is not a causal relationship between
certain vaccine types and autism, and this study supports that
conclusion. [3]</blockquote>Why You Can’t Trust the CDC

I found three major flaws with this study.

1. The number of children in each group is unbalanced.

How can a study of this caliber be fairly examined if the numbers of children taking part in each group are unequal?

2. There was no control group.

All reputable studies need a control group to compare the results with.
For this study to be taken seriously researchers would need three groups
of participants, the third group being a group of unvaccinated
children.

3. There was no mention of genetics or whether any of the children
suffered from an underlying condition that may have made them
susceptible to adverse reactions.

In recent years researchers have determined that certain genetic
disorders have the potential to cause children to react adversely to
vaccines. An excellent example of how a genetic condition can affect a
child receiving vaccines can be seen in the case of Hannah Polling. [4]

Hannah suffered from a mitochondrial disorder — a dysfunction in basic
cell metabolism, which put her at increased risk of injury from
vaccines, as determined by the vaccine court. The result of this
condition combined with the vast amount of vaccines that Hannah received
in one day was autism.

Experts Who Value Science More Than Profit

Professionals like Dr. Rebecca Carley, Dr. Viera Scheibner and
psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown have been warning parents about the
dangers of vaccines and their possible links to autism for many years.

Dr. Viera Scheibner, a retired principal research scientist with a
doctorate in natural sciences, has been speaking on the dangers of
vaccination since 1985. Dr. Scheibner has published three books and 90
scientific papers in prestigious scientific journals on the subject.

Dr. Rebecca Carley was the first professional to recognize that there
was a link between the MMR vaccination and the non-fatal form of SSPE,
which she has been classifying as autism for the past fifteen years. Her
professional opinions have been backed up scientifically as one hundred
percent correct when government documents locked up for thirty years
were recently uncovered, revealing that the government had discovered
that the MMR vaccine was causing what they referred to as an SSPE
like-syndrome.

Psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown has been speaking out since 1995 on
the link among vaccines, autism and parents being falsely accused of
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. She began to notice the link after she
witnessed the parents of autistic children were being blamed for their
children’s illnesses and disabilities as soon as they mentioned that
their child/children became ill after they received a vaccine.

Conclusion

Governments are so determined to push vaccinations and reassure mothers
that vaccines do not cause autism, they have come up with yet another
flawed study to prove it. This effort is followed by a massive
vaccination drive and media campaign to scare parents into accepting
vaccines. Just to reassure parents further, the government is now
encouraging the development of a vaccine to alleviate the symptoms of
autism, just in case they are wrong. Really reassuring, isn’t it?

Here we have yet another example of just how desperate governments and
the pharmaceutical industries are to protect the vaccination schedule.
Instead of admitting that vaccinations are not only damaging the health
of our children and that vaccines are totally ineffective at controlling
diseases, governments get together with scientists to cash in on
children’s suffering and develop yet another useless vaccine to cure the
symptoms caused by the original vaccine.

Instead of wasting time developing more vaccinations, scientists, big
pharma and governments would be better employed spending more time
researching what professionals like Dr. Rebecca Carley, Dr. Viera
Scheibner and psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown have been saying for
years.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/05/scientists-developing-new-autism.html