The Vaccination Agenda: An Implicit Transhumanism/Dehumanism

The Vaccination Agenda: An Implicit Transhumanism/Dehumanism








Let's face it: the only real justification for using vaccines to "immunize" ourselves against disease is derived from the natural fact
that when challenged by infectious agents the humoral arm of our
immune system launches a successful response capable of conferring
lasting immunity. Were it not for the elegance, proficiency, and mostly
asymptomatic success of our recombinatorial immune system in dealing
so well with infectious challenges, vaccination would have no cause, no
scientific explanation, no justification whatsoever.

In fact, ever since the adaptive, antigen-specific immune system evolved in early vertebrates 500 million years ago,
our bodies have been doing a pretty good job of keeping us alive on
this planet without need for synthetic, vaccine-mediated immunity.
Indeed, infectious challenges are necessary for the
development of a healthy immune system and in order to prevent
autoimmune conditions from emerging as a result of TH2 dominance. In
other words, take away these natural infectious challenges, and the
immune system can and will turn upon itself; take way these infectious
challenges and lasting immunity against tens, if not hundreds of
thousands of pathogens we are exposed to throughout our lives, would not
be possible.
Can vaccines really co-opt, improve upon, and replace natural immunity with synthetic immunity?
How many will this require?

Are we not already at the critical threshold of vaccine overload?
By "improving" on our humanness in this way, are we not also at the same moment departing dramatically from it?





Presently, compliance with the CDC's immunization schedule for children from birth through 6 years of age requires 60 vaccines*
be administered, purportedly to make them healthier than
non-vaccinated or naturally immunized ones.** Sixty vaccines, while a
disturbingly high amount (for those who retain the complementary human
faculties of reason and intuition), does not, however, correctly convey
just how many antigenic challenges these children face in total.

A new paper published in the journal Lupus entitled Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations, points out that as many as 125 antigenic compounds,
along with high amounts of aluminum (AI) adjuvants are given to
children by the time they are 4 and 6 years old, in some "developed"
countries. The authors also state: "Immune challenges during early
development, including those vaccine-induced, can lead to permanent
detrimental alterations of the brain and immune function. Experimental
evidence also shows that simultaneous administration of as little as two
to three immune adjuvants can overcome genetic resistance to
autoimmunity."

Vaccine adjuvants are agents that accelerate, enhance or prolong the
antigen-specific immune responses vaccines intend to illicit. In
essence, they enhance vaccine "efficacy," which is defined by the
ability to raise antibody titers. A vaccine's "effectiveness," on the
other hand -- and which is the real-world measure of whether a vaccine
works or not -- is not ascertainable through the number of antibodies
produced. Whether or not a vaccine or vaccine adjuvant boosts antibodies
that have actual affinity with the intended pathogen is what counts in
the real world, i.e. antibody-antigen affinity, (and not the sheer
volume of antibodies produced) determines whether a vaccine will be
effective or not.

The semantic confusion between "vaccine efficacy" and "vaccine
effectiveness" ensures that vaccines which disrupt/harm/hypersensitize
the immune system by stimulating unnaturally elevated antibody titers
may obtain FDA approval, despite the fact that they have never been
shown to confer real-world protection. *** Some vaccine researchers
have even suggested that breastfeeding, which may reduce
vaccine-induced elevations in antibody titers in infants, i.e. its
iatrogenic disease-promoting effects, should temporarily be delayed in
order not to interfere with the vaccine's so-called "efficacy."

Common adjuvants include: aluminum, mineral oil, detergent stabilized
squalene-in-water, pertactin, formaldehyde, viral DNA, phosphate, all
of which are inherently toxic, no matter what the route of exposure.

Many parents today do not consider how dangerous injecting adjuvants
directly into the muscle (and sometimes blood, due to incorrect and/or
non-existent aspiration techniques), especially in non-infected, healthy
offspring whose immune systems are only just learning to launch
effective responses to the innumerable pathogens already blanketing
their environment.

Adequate breastfeeding, in fact, is the most successful strategy in the
prevention of morbidity and mortality associated with infectious
challenges, and is so distinctively mammalian (i.e. obtaining nourishment and immunity through the mammary glands), that
without adequate levels (only 11.3% of infants in the US were
exclusively breastfed through the first six months of life (Source: CDC,
2004)) infants become much more readily susceptible to illness.

Not only have humans strayed from their mammalian roots, by creating and promoting infant formula over breast milk, and then promoting synthetic immunity via vaccines over the natural immunity conferred through breastfeeding
and sunlight exposure, for instance, but implicit within the dominant
medical model to replace natural immunity with a synthetic one, is a
philosophy of transhumanism, a movement which intends to improve upon
and transcend our humanity, and has close affiliation with some aspects
of eugenics.***

The CDC's immunization schedule reflects a callous lack of regard for
the 3 billion years of evolution that brought us to our present, intact
form, without elaborate technologies like vaccination
-- and likely only because we never had them at our disposal to inflict
potentially catastrophic harm to ourselves. The CDC is largely
responsible for generating the mass public perception that there is
greater harm in not "prophylactically" injecting well over 100
distinct disease-promoting and immune-disruptive substances into the
bodies of healthy children. They have been successful in instilling the
concept into the masses that Nature failed in her design, and that
medical and genetic technologies and interventions can be used to create
a superior human being.

In this culture of vaccination, the non-vaccinated child is "inferior,"
"dirty," perhaps even "sub-human" to those who look upon vaccination
as the answer to what perfects the human immune system. Transhumanism
participates in a dialectic which requires a simultaneous and
systematic dehumanization of those who do not share the same way of
thinking and behaving. The eugenic undertones of mass vaccination and
the cult of synthetic immunity are now only thinly veiled, as we move
closer to the point where a psuedo-scientific medical dictatorship lays
claim to our very bodies, and the bodies of our children.
The point of no return (if not already traversed) is only around the
corner: the mass introduction of DNA and Recombinant Vector Vaccine
technology. Vaccines moved through the following stages (a tortured
history of failures and massive "collateral damage"): Live Vaccines
> Attenuated Vaccines > Subunit Vaccines > Toxic Vaccines >
Conjugate Vaccines, only now reaching towards converting our living
tissue into "vaccine-making factories" through the use of DNA and
Recombinant Vector Vaccines, which are designed to directly alter cells
within the vaccinated person's body so that they create the antigens
normally provided by vaccines themselves.*****

While not yet in use, clinical trial are now underway to obtain FDA
approval. If we do not educate ourselves now and act accordingly, their
mass implementation is inevitable, and our very genomes will become the
next target of the vaccination/transhumanism agenda.

---

*counting the number of vaccine antigens, in total, e.g. trivalent influenza = 3 vaccine antigens.

** Natural immunization occurs to those who gain immunological
competence by being infected (often asymptomatically) by a wild-type
pathogen, launching a normal immune response, overcoming the infectious
challenge, and as a consequence obtaining lasting immunity.

*** Transhumanism is an international movement that believes in the
transformation of the human condition by using technologies to enhance
human intellectual, physical and psychological capacities.

**** The term "efficacy," when used in the context of a vaccine's
antibody-elevating effects, does not equate to effectiveness, i.e.
whether or not a vaccine actually works in real life to protect against the infectious agent of concern.
It is this semantic trick (conflating and confusing "efficacy" with
"effectiveness") which convinces most of the "developed" world that
vaccine research is "evidence-based" and focused on creating enhanced
immunity, when in fact it is primarily a highly successful business
enterprise dependent on defrauding its "customers" of both their money
and health. The dangers of common vaccines
are so well known by "health experts," and the manufacturers who
produce, them that their risk (like nuclear power) is underwritten by
world governments. The importance of this fact can not be overestimated
or understated.
Introducing foreign pathogenic DNA, chemicals, metals, preservatives,
etc., into the body through a syringe will generate a response not
unlike kicking a bee hive. The harder you kick that beehive, the greater
will be the "efficacy" (i.e. elevated antibodies), but the actual
affinity that these antibodies will have for the antigen (i.e. pathogen)
of concern, can not be guaranteed; nor must the vaccine researchers
prove antibody-antigen affinity to receive FDA approval.

Also, valuable immune resources are wasted by generating "false
flag" responses to threats which may not readily exist in the
environment, e.g. there are over 200 forms of influenza A, B & C
which can cause the symptoms associated with annual influenza A, so the
seasonal trivalent flu vaccine only takes care of little more than 1%
of the possible vectors of infection - and often at the price of
distracting resources away from real threats, as well as exhausting
and/or damaging the entire immune apparatus. Truth be told, there is
actually a shocking lack of evidence to support flu vaccines, in any age or population.
What's worse, the vaccine response can "blow back" causing loss of
self-tolerance and, via the resultant Th2 dominant immune system, the
body can attack itself (auto-immunity). In the meantime, the first line
of defense against infection (Th1) is compromised and this "front
door" can be left wide open to unmet infectious challenges.

It is clear that one can create a synthetic immune response
through vaccination, but it is not likely to result in enhanced
immunity, insofar as real-world effectiveness is concerned, which is the
only true judge of whether a vaccine is valuable or not. One might
view the basic criteria used by vaccine researchers, namely, that
generating elevated antibody titers proves the value of the vaccine,
oppositely: proving the vaccine is causing harm to the
developing infant by generating unnecessarily elevated antibodies by any
means necessary, i.e. throwing the chemical and biological kitchen
sink at the immune system, e.g. aluminum, phenol, diploid (aborted
fetal) cells, peanut oil, pertactin, etc.



Source:-
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccination-agenda-implicit-transhumanismdehumanism