Vaccine campaigns getting desperate

Vaccine campaigns getting desperate


(NaturalNews) Vaccine manufacturers and those poised to benefit from
vaccine revenue are working hard to keep critical information away from
the general public. Recently, a website that offers parents advice on
childhood vaccinations was told to remove information that was deemed
offensive and slanderous towards the vaccine makers. The advice was
supported by a study in 2002 and was presented in an informative manner
making the complaint against the website frivolous.

Research
exposing the true risks of vaccinations is never fully reported to the
medical professionals giving the shots. Parents are provided a,
carefully worded, vaccine insert only upon request. Moments prior to the
child receiving a shot, the parents are given a watered down sheet
distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that
is supposed to provide enough information for the parent to give
informed consent. At no point is a parent ever fully educated on the
ingredients within the vaccines, the efficacy rates or the host of less
common, adverse effects and in most cases, neither are those doing the
poking.

In recent years, public figures and concerned individuals
have made some progress in spreading the truth about vaccines. This
educational force has been met with various suppression tactics that are
coming across as desperate in recent months. As soon as vaccine rates
go down, a new spike in pertussis is publicized, heavily. Billboards,
wheezing babies on the radio and articles written in local papers by
medical professionals pop up everywhere. Such advertisement is described
as a public service announcement by vaccine
makers. In reality, the advertisements are simply aimed at drawing in
revenue. If the public's health were the primary concern, more
information about the safety of vaccines would be plastered across
expensive billboards instead of the focus being on fear.

Those in
favor of vaccination have tried to point the finger at unvaccinated
children as the source of the recent outbreak of pertussis. However, the
CDC reported on June
7, 2012 that the rising numbers can't be attributed to the reduction of
vaccinations. Within this briefing, the CDC pointed out that vaccinated
children are eight times less likely to catch pertussis and if they do,
it will be a milder version. Such data is never found on the vaccine
information sheet given prior to the shot. The pertussis vaccine
requires multiple boosters throughout childhood and adulthood to
maintain efficacy according to the CDC.

Within hours of the CDC's
brief being posted, headlines flood the internet touting a pertussis
epidemic and that vaccination fears are leading to the spread of
dangerous infection. At no point does the media report exactly what was
discussed in the brief. No mention is made of the risk of the vaccine
itself, let alone its inadequacies in preventing the illness in the
first place. In addition, whooping cough is made out to be a deadly
disease--one to be feared like the plagues of past decades. A little
digging on the CDC's website and others like (www.KidsHealth.org) reveal that whooping cough is worse than a really bad cold only on occasion. In fact, some people have it without realizing it.


Source:-
http://www.naturalnews.com/036819_vaccine_propaganda_censorship_autism.html