Admin
Admin
Posts : 8049
Join date : 2012-05-29
Location : Manchester UK
 |  Subject: NANO CHEMTRAILS  Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:27 | |
|
[center]NANO CHEMTRAILS
by William Thomas[/center] If
you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you are
not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force
promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules
tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing
people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal
complaints. Under
development since 1995, the military's goal is to install
microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart
particles" the size of a single molecule. Invisible
except under the magnification of powerful microscopes, these nano-size
radio-controlled chips are now being made out of mono-atomic gold
particles. Networked together on the ground or assembling in the air,
thousands of sensors will link into a single supercomputer no larger
than a grain of sand. Brought to you by the same military-corporate-banking complex that runs America's
permanent wars, Raytheon Corp is already profiting from new weather
warfare technologies. The world's fourth largest military weapons maker
bought E-Systems in 1995, just one year after that military contractor
bought APTI, holder of Bernard Eastlund's HAARP patents. Raytheon also owns General Dynamics, the world's leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Raytheon
also reports the weather for NOAA through its Advanced Weather
Information Processing System. According to researcher Brendan Bombaci
of Durango, Colorado,
these Raytheon computers are directy linked with their UAV weather
modification drones. Bombaci reports that NOAA paid Raytheon more than
$300 million for this "currently active, 10-year project." She
goes on to describe the Joint Environmental Toolkit used by the U.S. Air
Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the thing for planet
tinkerers.GREEN LIGHTFor
public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized.
"Microelectric Mechanical Sensors" (MMS) and "Global Environmental
Mechanical Sensors" sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny
autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct
31/05]According to a U.S.
military flier called Military Progress, "The green light has been
given" to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the
troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for "global warming
mitigation." U.S.
Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones
"are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare," Military
Progress asserts. This dual mission - to slow global warming and use
weather as a weapon - seems somewhat contradictory. FIGHTING FOR CLIMATE CHANGEU.S.
Military Inc. is already in the climate change business big time. The
single biggest burner of petroleum on this planet, its high-flying
aircraft routinely rend Earth's protective radiation shielding with
nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing megatons of additional carbon,
sulfur and water particles directly into the stratosphere - where they
will do three-times more damage than CO2 alone. Go
figure. A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache
gunship gets about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks
in Iraq
achieve five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells
that will continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova. A
single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of
bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14
days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half-
million gallons of fuel to supply its jets. The
U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the Department of Defense's
entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel
aloft. While
flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming
sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050
gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135
Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650
gallons of fuel per hour. The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2. Total
it up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world
militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be
eliminated by ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07; huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07] NANO RAINMeanwhile,
the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot
carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification
particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail
slurry packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T According to the air force's own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025,
clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into
hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report
real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.Then
these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm's
size and intensity - and "steer" it to "specific targets". The
air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails "will be able to adjust
their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make
adjustments throughout the process." Instead of being sprayed into the
air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal
chemtrails, nano versions will be able to "enhance their dispersal" by
"adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy" and "communicating with each
other" as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock within
their own artificial cloud. Nano-chemtrails
will even "change their temperature and polarity to improve their
seeding effects," the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]Rutgers
University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military's hope that
these new nano weather-warrior bots: "Interconnected, atmospherically
buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions - clouds
of microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with
a control system, could provide tremendous capability." Sounds expensive. FULL ARTICLE CONTINUED...   "It is potentially relatively inexpensive to do," Hall clarified. "About the same price per pound as potatoes." Why
so cheap? Because nano particles can be potentially self-replicating.
That is, they can be made to reproduce themselves until programmed to
stop. Hopefully. Maybe. Sometimes. Owning The Weather
goes on to say that the USAF will "manage and employ a
weather-modification capability by the Weather Force Support Element."
These weather forces will use real-time updates from swarms of the
nano-size "smart sensors" to model developing weather patterns with a
super-duper computer.Based
on continually updated forecast, the weather warriors will fly
follow-on missions as needed to tweak the storm. It's perfect, crows the
air force. "The total weather-modification process becomes "a real-time
loop of continuous, appropriate, measured interventions, and feedback
capable of producing desired weather behavior." Really? Weather modification did not work too well with Katrina. If
the notion of inserting Autonomous Intelligence nanobots into weather
systems to monitor, steer and mess with them seems risky, just wait.
Around the next cloud corner are coming swarms of airborne nano-bots to
optimize wind dispersal patterns for germ warfare. Or chemtrails. But
there's one small hitch. Nobody knows how Earth's atmosphere works. It
is so big, so complex and so unpredictable, even real-time
nano-snapshots are ancient history as soon as they are taken. This is why the air force said, "Advances in the science of chaos are critical to this endeavor." Good luck. After a decade of trying, not even a 48-hour weather forecast can be made without constant surprises. Because
they cannot be graphed in a cause-and-effect straight line, chaotic
"non-linear" weather processes can morph unexpectedly, defying predicted
weather modification inputs. Just ask Beijing. Then there's the matter of accidental genocide. I mean human health. SICKOSThe
chemtrails we are too familiar with after a decade-long dose continue to
inflict eye infections, nosebleeds, skin sores, muscle pain, chronic
exhaustion, weakened immunity, acute asthma and allergies, short-term
memory loss and heart attacks on people in more than a dozen countries.
[americanskywatch.com; Chemtrails Confirmed 2008 by William Thomas]Small particulates like the aluminum oxide found in chemtrails also kill. Dr.
Dan Woodard calls aluminum oxide a "nuisance dust". This MD says that
prolonged exposures to very high concentrations of particulates that are
visible in the air "can produce pulmonary fibrosis, somewhat like the
silicosis formerly seen in miners." "At
one time it was thought to precipitate Alzheimer's disease, but more
recent research has shown it is almost certainly unrelated," Dr.
Woodward adds. It's
the tiny size of chemtrail fallout - one-tenth the width of the human
hair - that make people very ill. The EPA warns that there is a strong
link between all tiny particles and thousands of premature deaths each
year. Two
key studies from the early 1990's by the Harvard School of Public Health
and the American Cancer Society found strong links between high levels
of small particles and a rise in death rates. In an article headlined,
"Tiny Particles Can Kill" the August 5, 2000 issue of New Scientist pointed to findings in six cities over 16 years showing that "city-dwellers in Europe and the U.S. are dying young because of microscopic particles in the air." According to the New York Times,
"microscopic motes… are able to infiltrate the tiniest compartments in
the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream." Particles in the size
range called for by the Welsbach Patent describing chemtrails are "most
strongly tied to illness and early death, particularly in people who are
already susceptible to respiratory problems." [New York Times Oct
14/06]The
Welsbach Patent calls for megatons of 10 micron-size aluminum oxide
particles to be spread in the atmosphere. The EPA calls particles this
small "an extreme human health hazard" leading to 5% increased death
rate within 24 hrs. "Hearts
as well as lungs can be damaged by ultra-fine particles small enough to
get into the bloodstream and inflame tissues and cells," reports the LA Times.
"After they reach the heart, the particles are thought to cause a
stress reaction in cells, producing inflammation that contributes to
heart disease. The particles also may cause blood clots." [Los Angeles Times Dec 29/03]The
Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning) division of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency says that exposure to airborne Particulate Matter "is
an environmental health risk of global proportions." [Health Risks Of
Aerosoled Particulates PubMed Abstract]The
EPA explains that by penetrating deep into the lungs and circulatory
system, these dust-size particles "are implicated in tens of thousands
of deaths annually from both respiratory and coronary disease." POP
QUIZ: What do you think will happen when nano-size machines tens of
thousands of times smaller than this are sprayed into the open air?"SMART PARTICLES" IN YOUR BRAIN MAKE YOU DEAD Nanoparticles
might better be called Nastyparticles because they make a beeline for
the brain as soon as they are inhaled. Not surprisingly, they tend to
accumulate and clump in the area of the brain that deals with smell. Too
big to pass back through the blood-brain barrier, they become trapped
there. [Nature.com Jan 5/04]Dr.
Celine Filippi also observed that nanoparticles inhaled into the lungs
are so mall they easily cross the lung barrier and enter the blood.
"Particles in the blood can reach the liver, amongst other organs."
[globalresearch.ca Oct 21/07] NANO CHEMTRAILSSo are we being sprayed with nano-chemtrails? Owning The Weather 2025
was published in 1995 and discussed only non-classified military
weather modification projects. Hall's Overview of Nanotechnology also
appeared in 1995, when nanotech was in its Frankenstein infancy. Since
then, many sources tell us, nanotech has gone exponential.
[nanotech-now.com] HANK CALLSThe term "nano-chemtrails" on my homepage prompted my trusted military informant I've dubbed "Hank" to call. "They
have them," he confirmed. The U.S. Air Force has occasionally added
nanoparticles to the chemtrail mix to demonstrate proof of concept. "We're
way beyond science fiction," Hank confirmed. "You can hide just about
anything you want in a chemtrail - including nanotubes. Chemtrails are
being altered for whatever spectrum of wavelength they're trying to
bounce off of them.   MORGELLONSWhat about Morgellons? Is there any connection between this bizarre and frightening malady and nano experiments? "You're not going to like this," Hank said. "Morgellons is one unintended manifestation of nano spray experiments." Morgellons
manifests - or presents" - as intolerable itching in the skin followed
by alien eruptions of thin hairs or tendrils through the skin. "It's
basically the same as excreting something through a hair follicle," Hank
said. He meant a toxin - something foreign to the body. "If
you manufacture a liquid super-cyrstalline structure, vibrate it a
little and give it an electrical charge - it will form into a chain." These
nanotubes will be invisible to the eye, of course. But their tendency
to clump together could eventually make them big enough to be
photographed and posted on the web.  How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far? "Tens of tons," he replied. Tens of tons of molecules?"Much
of it is still up there," Hank went on to explain. This is because
nanoparticles are so light and small they tend bind to bind with oxygen
molecules. And piggybacking on oxygen particles makes them buoyant. "It
travels worldwide," Hank continued. "Some of it comes down. Whatever
it's exposed to up there it brings down here. We get exposed to it. We
breathe it in, we ingest it. It accrues in the same spot every time. And
attracts more of it… " In the liver. And brain. "The fallout would look like a prion disease," Hank said. "Fallout from nanoparticles would eat holes in our brains?" "Pretty
much. Nano particles are ionized particles that go to what attracts
them…. Because of their electro-chemical properties, they are attracted
to the potassium-calcium channel in the brain." Think
about it, he said. "If they are capable of withstanding the corrosive
upper atmosphere - corrosive sunlight and all those (industrial)
chemicals - what would they have to be manufactured out of? Does the
body manufacture anything that can deal with that? Who will come forward
and say these are good? | |
|
Calendar