Cost of Chemtrail Program Put At $5 Billion a Year

Cost of Chemtrail Program Put At $5 Billion a Year
New study looks at specially adapted aircraft to disperse particles into upper atmosphere

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, September 5, 2012

The cost of a massive program to spray sun-dimming
particles into the upper atmosphere in the name of halting global
warming, a process some contend is already underway via chemtrails, has
been put at just below $5 billion dollars a year.


U.S. scientists writing in the journal Environmental
Research Letters concluded that “Planes or airships could carry
sun-dimming materials high into the atmosphere for an affordable price
tag of below $5 billion a year as a way to slow climate change,” reports Reuters, a process characterized as “both feasible and affordable.”

The cost of using specially adapted aircraft able to
operate at high altitudes as a delivery system to disperse sulphur
particles was put at $1 to $2 billion a year. Using “giant guns or
rockets” would be more expensive.

Co-author Professor Jay Apt of Carnegie Mellon
University in Pittsburgh told Reuters that injecting the atmosphere with
sulphur but then suddenly removing it from the eco-system could cause
temperatures to jump, indicating that the program would have to be
ongoing in perpetuity.

The study completely failed to analyze whether such a
massive geoengineering program would be a good idea and what
environmental consequences it would have.

The latest study follows a similar Carnegie Institution
for Science proposal which also advocated spraying the upper atmosphere
with aerosols, a process that would “reduce by 20 per cent the amount of
sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground” and make blue skies
“fade to hazy white,” the New Scientist reported.

Given the fact that most advancements in science and
technology are already taking place years before they are disclosed to
the public, it stands to reason that geoengineering programs based
around spraying the upper atmosphere with particles are already
underway, most notably in the form of chemtrails, contrails that linger
in the sky for hours and form into artificial clouds.

Scientists now admit that vapor trails from airplanes
are creating “artificial clouds” that block out the sun. This is no
longer a matter of debate. The chemtrail “conspiracy theorists,” who
were ridiculed for pointing out that from the mid-90?s onwards contrails
from jet planes were lingering for hours and forming artificial clouds,
have been proven correct.

Reading University’s Professor Keith Shine told the Daily Mail that
the clouds “formed by aircraft fumes could linger ‘for hours’,
depriving those areas under busy flight paths, such as London and the
Home Counties, of summer sunshine.”

The report also makes reference to a 2009 Met Office
study which found that high-level winds did not disperse contrails that
later formed into clouds which covered an astonishing 20,000 miles.

As we have documented, geoengineering programs based
around the premise of artificial aerosols were already in operation
years ago, including at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in
Aiken, S.C, which in 2009 began conducting studies which involved
shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled
glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere.

Another program under the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program is
directed towards, “developing comprehensive understanding of the
atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and
fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter.”

The DOE website states that, “The current focus of the
program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and
evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct and indirect
influences on climate and climate change.”

These programs are already having the effect of blocking
out sunlight. The emergence of the chemtrails phenomenon coincided with
an average 22% drop in sunlight reaching the earth’s surface.

In 2008, a KSLA news investigation found
that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail
contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as
trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium,
selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic
while several are rarely or never found in nature.

The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows
is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples
at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.” The
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality confirmed that the high
levels of Barium were “very unusual,” but commented that “proving the
source was a whole other matter” in its discussion with KSLA.

KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison
Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan
commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to
chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure
problems.” The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term
exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening
the immune system.

Spraying sulphur into the upper atmosphere is linked with both environmental catastrophes and human health problems.

The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.

- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism

Even pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits
that injecting sulphur into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain,
ozone depletion or weather pattern disruption.”

Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock also,
“created computer simulations indicating that sulfate clouds could
potentially weaken the Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain
that irrigates the food crops of billions of people.”

“Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the planet,” Robock told a geoengineering conference in 2010.

The Canada-based Action Group on Erosion, Technology and
Concentration (ETC) has called for such experiments to be shut down.
“This experiment is only phase one of a much bigger plan that could have
devastating consequences, including large changes in weather patterns
such as deadly droughts,” the group said in a written statement.

Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental
Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns
that the consequences of tinkering with the planet’s delicate eco-system
could have far-reaching dangers.

“If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress
the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would
rather avoid,” said Singer.

Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist – a staunch
advocate of the man-made global warming explanation – Doug Parr – has
slammed attempts to geoengineer the planet as “outlandish” and
“dangerous”.




Source:-
http://aircrap.org/cost-chemtrail-program-put-5-billion-year/335302/