US Climate Change Procedure Based on UN’s Geoengineering Governance and Technology Policy

US Climate Change Procedure Based on UN’s Geoengineering Governance and Technology Policy










Use of geoengineering is supported by members of the scientific
community working in line with the climate change alarmists. These
modifications extend to plate tectonics, ocean fertilization, cloud
seeding, Co2 sequestration and military weaponry.

Project Cirrus (PC),
a.k.a. Project Stormfury), was conducted by the US government between
1962 and 1983 in an attempt to manipulate the weather by affecting
hurricane behavior.

PC was headed by General Electric, the US Army Signal Corps, the Office of Naval Research and the US Air Force .

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) states in their study that
“climate engineering technologies, focusing on their technical status,
future directions for research and potential responses.” The GAO
reviewed the scientific literature and government reports, consulted
experts with a wide variety of backgrounds and viewpoints, and surveyed
1,006 adults across the United States.

The GAO concluded that “climate engineering technologies do not now offer a viable response to global climate change.”

Areas of study were:

• Carbon dioxide removal
  
• Solar radiation management
  

Solar radiation management (SRM), a technique for blocking the sun’s
light in order to prevent access heat from affecting the Earth’s
surface, has been used in many countries including:

• The United States
  
• Brazil
  
• Costa Rica
  
• England
  
• Most European countries
  

SRM consists of spraying crystals and toxic chemicals such as sulfate aerosols and barium into the upper atmosphere.


Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, environmental writer and former university professor and scholar, states:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">For
more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada’s citizens
have been subjected to a 24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads
made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other
dangerous ingredients. None of this was reported by any mainstream
media. The US Department of Defense (DOD)
and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with
what are known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol
Geoengineering).</blockquote>The
GAO admits that current geoengineering techniques are immature and that
many of them could have potentially negative consequences. Yet, the
consensus of governmental agencies has chosen to disregard the health
hazards to the general public in favor of the continued use of
geoengineering.

Scientists in support of geoengineering, knowing “major technology risks
or limited future climate change” show their bias toward the “science”.
The GAO have looked toward the private sector because governments and
corporations working with them subvert their findings and conduct
experiments worldwide without consent.

According to the Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy (GGTP)
report, produced by the Congressional Research Service, the US
government “has joined with other nations . . . as a participant in
several international agreements on climate change.”

The experimental aspect of geoengineering in the US is directed in the
“absence of a comprehensive [climate change] policy” that will “modify
the Earth’s climate” and make these technologies available to “foreign
governments and entities in the private sector to use unilaterally
without authorization from the US government or an international
treaty.’

Oversight concerning geoengineering research and experimental projects
is allocated to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of
Energy (DoE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), and the Department of
Defense.

Although there is no provision, many of the UN’s international treaties
relating to climate change, maritime pollution and air pollution are
used to govern the pursuit of geoengineering.

In 2010, the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) outlined the necessity of geoengineering for the sake of saving the Earth’s biodiversity.

The US government, using the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as their guide, has created policies to mitigate the fabled effects of man-made climate change.

The GGTP states that:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">geoengineering
technologies, applied to the climate, aim to achieve large-scale and
deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance in order to
reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic (i.e., human-made)
climate change; these climate modifications would not be limited by
country boundaries.</blockquote>In 2009, the Congress’ House Science and Technology Committee discussed:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">potential
environmental risks and benefits of various proposals, associated
domestic and international governance issues, evaluation mechanisms and
criteria, research and development (R&D) needs, and economic
rationales supporting the deployment of geoengineering activities. </blockquote>The
United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and India provided scientists that
supported the engagement of geoengineering technologies in the name of
reducing emissions, preserving "climate sensitivity", and climate
thresholds under the pursuit of political, social and economic
mitigation strategies.

The UN’s assertion that climate change is directly causal to humans has
inspired mandates for geoengineering governance. This scheme does not
rely on scientific data or research studies, but rather real world
experiments with chemtrail technologies conducted by governmental
agencies and private sector corporations employed by policymakers and
international entities.

Through the covering of governmental policy, the UN hopes to design
technologies to control the climate; advance geoengineering options in
lieu of effectively mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (for
example, could result in a number of adverse effects, including ocean
acidification, stresses on biodiversity, climate sensitivity shocks, and
other irreversible consequences); engage the private sector
corporations by enticing them with government subsidies while examining
their ownership models, intellectual property rights and trade and
transfer mechanisms for the dissemination of geoengineering
technologies.

While the UN anticipated that the general public would become aware of their schemes (as is happening now) they planned a propaganda campaign to
assert transparency while hiding the actuality of critical technologies
to avoid liabilities and compensation to the public for adverse effects
of geoengineering.

To cover up their unethical impact on the Earth, the UN created “ information” to be made available to the public and hired scientists to praise their deployment of geoengineering.

John Holdren, US Science Adviser to Obama, has come out publicly to claim that geoengineering will assist the planet in stabilizing its weather with regard to global warming.

Holdren says geoengineering is a perfectly viable way to cool the
planet’s temperature. He fully supports the process of releasing
particles of barium, magnesium, aluminum, nano-fibers, bacillus blood
spores and other chemicals to reflect sunlight away from the Earth.

The implementation of geoengineering, a scheme of the UN’s decisive
endeavor to create global governance, is not only fully supported by the
US government, but the UN’s direct policies and procedures are
literally adopted as strategies of the Obama administration.

Source:-

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/06/us-climate-change-procedure-based-on.html




http://vaccinesdonotwork.blogspot.com/