James Holmes: three ways to get set up for murder

James Holmes: three ways to get set up for murder

(NaturalNews) A prison inmate claims Holmes confessed he was a
mind-controlled assassin. Paul Watson, writing at Infowars, covers the
story:

http://www.infowars.com

There are three roads that can lead to hugely inconvenient truth about Holmes.

One:
he was set up and subjected to mind control, after which he committed
the murders at the Aurora theater. He was programmed to kill.

Two:
he was a patsy. He didn't kill anybody. He was drugged and dumped in
his car at the theater, set up to be arrested there, not at the door of
the theater. The drug would have induced short-term amnesia. Holmes was
clueless.

Three: he was a victim of standard psychiatric
drugging, at the hands of any of three psychiatrists at the U of
Colorado, where he had been a student. For example, ordinary
"therapeutic" dosing with antidepressants like Prozac, Zoloft, or Paxil
could very well have induced a homicidal rage. In that case, the U of
Colorado would be bracing for a billion-dollar lawsuit.

This is one reason for the very tight information-control on the case.

It
should be understood that standard psychiatric drugging and the
drugging that would have taken place, in mind-control programming, are
two very different protocols.

You don't feed somebody Prozac and
feel certain he will kill as directed. The SSRI antidepressants are
unpredictable. Under intentional mind-control programming to kill, the
drugs would have assisted accompanying hypnosis. The drugs would have
induced temporary passivity and increased suggestibility.

The exception? If Holmes had been subjected to long-term mind control,
all sorts of disorienting drugs could have been used to soften him up;
for example, LSD at high doses, or similar designer hallucinogenics.

Nothing public has been released about the results of Holmes' tox-screen blood tests while in jail.

It
would, of course, be quite revealing to learn what drugs Holmes was
given by his psychiatrist(s). If any of them, e.g, Dr. Lynne Fenton, was
actually involved in programming him, they would have avoided standard
meds, because such unpredictable chemicals could have disrupted Holmes'
orders to kill.

In 1995, a presidential committee set up to hear
testimony on illegal radiation experiments suddenly bloomed into
testimony about mind
control. Two patients of New Orleans therapist, Valerie Wolf, Claudia
Mullin and Cris De Nicola, took the stand and recounted how radiation
had been used on them, as part of a much wider-ranging program.

They
spoke about their long-term nightmare, starting as children, during
which hallucinogenic drugs, spinning tables, blinking lights, hypnosis,
and programming were employed to make them into agents under the CIA's
secret MKULTRA aegis. In those cases, the drugs were used to scramble
their brains.

In Holmes' case, more sophisticated means could
have been deployed. For instance, electronic transmissions that would
have disrupted normal functioning of his brain, and even induced
thought-replacement, if he had been already placed under sufficient
duress.

One of the crude forerunners of these techniques was
invented by the world-famous Canadian psychiatrist, Ewen Cameron, who
carried out experiments on unwitting patients during the 1950s.
Partially funded by a CIA front, Cameron's torture method was called
psychic driving.

After horrendous electric shocks, drugs were
given to place patients in days of prolonged sleep. Cameron then
subjected them to audio tapes he made, in which he repeated phrases
thousands of times, in order to produce new personalities for them.

A
2012 lawsuit filed by veterans' groups, against the CIA and the DOD,
refers to Cameron's methods. The suit also states that two researchers,
Dr. Louis West and Dr. Jose Delgado, working together under the early
MKULTRA subproject 95, utilized two protocols: brain implants
("stimoceivers") and RHIC-EDOM to program the minds of victims.

RHIC-EDOM
stands for Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control-Electronic Dissolution
of Memory. Translation: bury memory, and insert commands.

The
stimoceiver was an implant developed by Delgado, who was a famous Yale
researcher. He set out to prove he could control physical actions.

Delgado's
most dramatic experiment involved stepping into a ring with a bull, who
had been outfitted with the stimoceiver implant. The bull charged
Delgado, who pressed a button on a handheld device...and the bull
stopped dead in his tracks.

In ensuing years, RHIC-EDOM and
Delgado's stimoceiver were researched using a variety of newer methods.
The main objective was production of artificial emotion, thought, and
action.

On the other hand, if James Holmes
wasn't an MKULTRA-type assassin, but instead a simple psychiatric
patient, there is ample evidence in the medical literature to indicate
murder is an outcome of various drugs.

In other words, Holmes'
personal problems weren't enough to push him into the theater where he
killed people at random. That was an ordinary effect of the drugs, which
scrambled his neurotransmitter systems and literally drove him crazy.

See
the work of Dr. Peter Breggin, who has been aptly called "the
conscience of psychiatry." In his first landmark book, Toxic Psychiatry,
and in later books and articles, Breggin makes a clear case for
psychiatric meds as the cause of suicides and homicides. (www.breggin.com)

In
interviews with me, Breggin stated that, in the 1999 Columbine
school-shooting case, one of the shooters, Eric Harris, was on Luvox, an
SSRI antidepressant. "This type of drug," Breggin said, "can cause the
patient to kill, but also to make grandiose plans for destruction."

Holmes
as a simple patsy is the third road of investigation. There are clues
to suggest this path. The "other gas mask" found at the back of the
theater, after the murders, is still unexplained. It could have been
cast aside by a shooter, not Holmes, during an escape.

At least
two witnesses have testified there were two shooters in the theater.
This, of course, suggests, a planned operation. The idea of Holmes
collaborating with another killer is odd, to say the least, given the
background we've been fed about his unstable mental condition and his
loner status.

Initial reports claimed Homes surrendered himself
to police, at a theater exit, after the shootings. This is contradicted
by witness assertions that he was arrested in his car.

To sort out what really happened at the Aurora theater, one must follow all three tracks of inquiry.

Possible
overlaps exist. Holmes could have been drugged merely to set him up as
the patsy, in which case, he committed no crime at all. He could have
been drugged and programmed prior to him visiting a psychiatrist at the U
of Colorado. In that scenario, the basic op was enforced by psychiatric
"boosters" involving, perhaps, hypnosis. Or Holmes was indeed
programmed to kill and become the patsy, allowing other shooters to
escape---but Holmes didn't, finally, carry out the murders.

This
last scenario resembles what happened in the 1968 assassination of
Robert Kennedy. Sirhan Sirhan, the patsy, did in fact have a gun at the
Ambassador Hotel. But he was standing in front of RFK in the kitchen,
and the shots that killed RFK came from behind. Sirhan had kept
notebooks in which, prior to the assassination, he revealed an obsessed
and apparently dissociated state of mind.

See this account of the RFK murder, which casts overwhelming doubt on the official story:

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Robert_Kennedy_Assassination

Holmes, like Sirhan, kept a notebook, which he mailed to his psychiatrist at the U of Colorado. What was in it?

If
we ever find out, we may see even closer parallels to the RFK
assassination, in which all signs pointed to Sirhan, including his
programming...but those clues were laid down to divert the investigation
from the real shooter, who stood behind Kennedy in the kitchen of the
Ambassador Hotel.

Perhaps the most tantalizing clues of all come
from a kind of social/media analysis. Here is a section from an earlier
article of mine, "Were the Batman Murders a Covert Op?"

It is
noteworthy that a young neuroscience student, Holmes, who was at one
point studying "the biological basis of mental disorders," winds up as
an accused mass murderer who is "obviously deranged" and "suffering from
a chemical imbalance in the brain."

At this point, we go down the rabbit hole, and the pieces of the puzzle are strange.

A
video has emerged of Holmes, at age 18, six years ago, lecturing to
fellow attendees at a science summer camp at Miramar College in San
Diego.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lotOPjLlbDU

Holmes
explains he has been studying temporal illusions and subjective
experience. A temporal illusion, he states, is the idea that you can
change the past.

At the Cannonfire blog (http://cannonfire.blogspot.com)
there are comic-book panels posted from what Joseph Cannon calls "the
most famous passage in the most famous of all Joker stories, Alan
Moore's 'The Killing Joke.'"

The Joker is asked: "I mean, what is
it with you? What made you you the way you are? Girlfriend killed by
the mob? Maybe brother carved up by some mugger...?"

The Joker
replies: "Something like that happened to me, you know...I'm not exactly
sure what it was. Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes
another...if I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple
choice! Ha ha ha!"

James Holmes, at 18 years of age, said he was
studying temporal illusion, "the idea that you can change the past," a
feat the fictional Joker had obviously accomplished.

In the last
ten years, the film that explored this subject---and Holmes' other
interest, the subjectivity of experience---most deeply, through its
treatment of dreams and the insertion of synthetic experience in the
mind, was Inception, directed by Christopher Nolan, who of course also
directed the recent Batman trilogy, including The Dark Knight Rises.

In
yet another version of changing the past, in 2000 Nolan directed
Memento, which unraveled its story backwards, as a victim of anterograde
amnesia, who can't store memories, tries to revenge his wife's murder by leaving clues for himself that will lead him to the identity of her killer.

Are
we simply talking about a neuroscience student's (Holmes') interest in
comics and films, or did he participate in experiments that attempted to
alter his subjective view of the world and his own past?

For
example, there is wealth of information about the criminal experiments
conducted by Canadian psychiatrist, Dr. Ewan Cameron, who operated with
funding from the CIA during the 1950s. Cameron ran MKULTRA Subproject
68, during which he used massive electroshocks, sensory isolation,
drug-induced periods of sleep (7-10 days), and audiotapes of
"re-patterning" commands to attempt to wipe out patients' pasts, their
memories, their former subjective mindsets, their very
personalities---in favor of recreating these patients as "new and
improved people."

As a teen, Holmes interned at the Salk
Institute in San Diego. Salk carries out studies using functional MRI, a
technique of brain mapping that involves correlating read-outs with
various mental activities. It's only speculation at this point, but
somewhere along the line, did Holmes participate in such experiments,
and were the results used to map regions of his brain for later inputs,
so someone could achieve behavioral/thought control over him?

To
even suggest Holmes may be a mind-control subject brings immediate
criticism, to which I would offer this counter: why accept the scenario
of the crime put forward by the Aurora police? Why do they deserve the
benefit of the doubt? Why limit and narrow the investigation to their
story?

Was law enforcement correct about the JFK and JFK and MLK
assassinations? Was law enforcement correct about the Columbine
massacre, in which 101 witnesses state they saw other shooters? Was law
enforcement correct about the lone duo of plotters in the Oklahoma
bombing? Was law enforcement correct about 9/11?

In all cases---no.

I'll
tell you this. If the authorities really wanted to know what makes
James Holmes tick (a prospect I strongly doubt), their best chance would
be to send someone into his cell who could talk to him about
Christopher Nolan, Inception, Memento, functional MRI, and the TV
series, Lost, which contained time-travel themes and was a show he and
his friend, Ritchie Duong, used to watch together every week when they
attended UC Riverside. Talk to Holmes about what he wants to talk about.
Who knows what would eventually unravel?

It would be far more than the police wish to uncover.


Source:-
http://www.naturalnews.com/038165_James_Holmes_murder_mind_control.html