Will the West Stage a Chemical Attack To Justify War in Syria?

Will the West Stage a Chemical Attack To Justify War in Syria?


Eric Blair
Activist Post

It appears the United States is determined to engage in yet another war
without having been attacked or even having their allies attacked. The
brazen Obama doctrine of preemptively bombing civilians to prevent a
humanitarian crisis may soon be coming to another lucky country; Syria.

Although the build up to this conflict has been brewing for some time,
it has now begun to boil. The US State Department is claiming
categorically that Syria has weapons of mass destruction and that their
use against foreign-backed rebels is imminent.

From NBC:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The Syrian military is prepared to use chemical weapons against its own
people and is awaiting final orders from President Bashar Assad, U.S. officials told NBC News on Wednesday.

The military has loaded the precursor chemicals for sarin, a deadly
nerve gas, into aerial bombs that could be dropped onto the Syrian
people from dozens of fighter-bombers, the officials said. (emphasis added)</blockquote>
They wouldn't be lying to get us into another war of aggression, would they?

I guess they learned that it's easier to just make
direct assumptions than present phony theatrics to the United Nations of
empty vials and illustrations of mobile weapons' labs.

Meanwhile, the West continues to fund, arm, and train the rebels who are
admittedly mostly foreigners and for all intents and purposes, Islamic
terrorists -- just like they did in Libya.

It appears that if you're a secular country in the Middle East or North
Africa that allows freedom of religion and women to become doctors,
you're the enemy of the West while they stay friendly with oppressive
regimes.

Iraq, Egypt, and Libya
seem so much better off since the West liberated them from brutal
dictators who peacefully accepted other religions and let women show
their faces in public. Yet, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain are rewarded for
public beheadings, crushing peaceful protests, and RFID tracking of their fully burqa-ed women by these humanitarian warriors.

Several other stories indicate that America is steamrolling to war in Syria.

The NDAA that passed unanimously in the Senate to fund military operations for 2013 contained an amendment
introduced by Sen. John McCain (Amendment 3262), which seeks
recommendations for a no-fly zone and other military activities "that
could deny or degrade the ability of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to
use air power against civilians and opposition groups in Syria."

And, as we learned from the violent overthrow of Gaddafi, the new
definition of a no-fly zone is carpet bombing heavily populated cities
and critical infrastructure in order to remove a leader of a sovereign
country with a state-run central bank.

Additionally, NATO has recently moved Patriot missiles into Turkey pointed at Syria and the U.N. has pulled non-essential staff from Syria.

The U.S. has made the use of WMD by Assad the line in the sand. Obama said Monday,
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if
you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be
consequences and you will be held accountable.</blockquote>
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reinforced this yesterday in Brussels:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Our concerns are that an increasingly desperate Assad regime might turn
to chemical weapons, or might lose control of them to one of the many
groups that are now operating within Syria. We have sent an unmistakable
message that this would cross a red line and those responsible would be
held to account.</blockquote>
Even if Assad had them and used them against the terrorist rebels, who are proven to be primarily foreigners fighting a Jihad, does that justify U.S. intervention? I thought the U.S. was fighting against Islamic Jihadists?

The only one who seems "desperate" is the West, to justify their
military presence in the region. It would not surprise me in the least
if the U.S.-backed rebels drop some mustard gas on civilians to blame
Assad. They've certainly been doing a lot worse to civilians in the name
of liberating them.

Then the West can hold Assad "accountable" and go collect their next central bank in pursuit of global domination.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/will-west-stage-chemical-attack-to.html