Codex Alimentarius... An Introduction to Soft Kill Eugenics

Codex Alimentarius... An Introduction to Soft Kill Eugenics










Submitted by SadInAmerica on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 2:45am.



Every bite of food provided to these people is the product of a
laboratory – the genetically modified spawn of Big Agri and Big Pharma.


The food looks incredible – huge, radiant tomatoes such a vivid red
that one would think the lycopene was virtually emanating from the skin
of the fruit. Inside that appealing package is a food-like substance,
utterly raped of nutrients.

The people are unable to go to a health-food store and purchase
vitamins or an herbal tonic to put the spring back in their step.

Herbs, vitamins and nutrients in general have been labeled "toxins"
and are only available via prescription at high prices and low doses.

If the people are caught hoarding treasured fertile heirloom seeds,
and heaven forbid, planting them to grow their own food, punishment is
swift and sure. The bounty is taken and the people starve again.

Amidst the abundance of burgeoning supermarket shelves, the majority of the world's population is slowly starving to death...

The world according to Codex Alimentarius looks grim indeed. Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code") is a global set of standards created by the CA Commission, a body established by a branch or the United Nations back in 1963.

The CA Commission's purported mission, like all Agenda 21 missions, sounds so wonderful that it might have been created by a committee from heaven above.

<blockquote>
The main purposes of this Programme are protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade

</blockquote>
Don't you wonder what could possibly be wrong with that? The UN wants us to be healthy and wants everyone to be paid fairly.

Codex Alimentarius sounds great! Let's institute these standards right away!

As with all globally stated agendas, however, CA's darker purpose is shielded by the feel-good words.

Global committees have been established to regulate the following topics, to name a few.

· fruits and vegetables

· fruit and vegetable juices

· fats and oils

· meat, poultry and fish

· cereals, pulses (used for food and animal feed) and legumes

· milk and milk products

· natural mineral waters

· sugars

· cocoa products and chocolate

· food hygiene

· food labeling (as a way not to disclose GMO foods and ingredients)

· pesticide residues;

· residues of veterinary drugs found in foods

· food additives

The unfortunate thing is, the regulations ensure money, not safety. They guarantee profit, not health benefits.

"Codex Alimentarius is a dark marriage between pharmaceutical and
chemical industries and the WTO, conceived to exact complete and
regimented control over all food products and nutrients worldwide." ~
writes Chantal Boccaccio of The People's Voice.

Follow the Money

So if all of these regulations don't benefit the consumers, who do they benefit? Dr. Rima Laibow, of Health Freedom USA
estimated that for every dollar spent on natural health solutions and
supplements, Big Pharma loses $40. Therefore, if people have the option
to chose vitamins over valium, Big Pharma loses billions per year.

The medical establishment benefits. When people are
able to manage chronic conditions and avoid surgery through carefully
choosing what they eat or what supplements they take, the medical
establishment loses out on those costly visits that people must
undertake in order to "manage" their conditions.

Pesticide manufacturers benefit. GMO foods require
greater pesticide use, thus manufacturers of pesticides like Round-up
(Monsanto) reap the financial rewards while being allowed to poison the
environment.

Food processors benefit. CA requires food to be
irradiated, a low cost (and nutrient-destroying) practice to require
lower standards of hygiene and sanitation.

Big Pharma benefits. CA mandates that nutrients be
classified as drugs; therefore the purchase of vitamins will eventually
require a prescription. Prescription drugs, of course, are monitored by
the FDA, which means only the Big Pharma companies will be able to
manufacture and supply them.

Maybe, then, the United States should just refuse to take part in CA.

That's not going to happen, because all members of the World Trade
Organization are legally bound under global guidelines, including CA
standards. CA standards override all national laws.

Lack of compliance to these standards may result in fines and/or
crippling trade sanctions. If a country wants to play the global
trading game, that country has no option whatsoever but to comply with
CA.

Those who do not comply automatically forfeit the judgment in any global trade dispute regarding food or nutrients.

It's Already Here

In 2010, during the distraction of the BP Oil Spill, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order (#13544) to implement CA in the US over the course of the next few years.

More akin to a royal decree
than a constitutionally acceptable legislation, Obama proved his
arrogance once again: he does NOT require the approval of Congress to
make sweeping legislation's.

In the United States, the FDA
is in charge of implementing the standards. Over the next two years,
with the Food Safety Modernization Act, they will be doing just that.

According to a Natural News article
by Dr. Gregory D'Amato, these irrevocable standards are on their way of
being implemented to allow the US to "HARMonize" with Codex.

* All nutrients (vitamins and minerals) are to be considered
toxins/poisons and are to be removed from all food because Codex
prohibits the use of nutrients to "prevent, treat or cure any condition
or disease"

* All food (including organic) is to be irradiated, removing all toxic nutrients from food (unless eaten locally and raw).

* Nutrients allowed will be limited to a Positive List
developed by Codex which will include such beneficial nutrients like
Fluoride (3.8 mg daily) developed from environmental waste. All other
nutrients will be prohibited nationally and internationally to all
Codex-compliant countries [2].

* All nutrients (e.g., CoQ10, Vitamins A, B, C, D, Zinc and
Magnesium) that have any positive health impact on the body will be
deemed illegal under Codex and are to be reduced to amounts negligible
to humans' health [3].

* All advice on nutrition (including written online or
journal articles or oral advice to a friend, family member or anyone)
will be illegal.

* All dairy cows are to be treated with Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone.

* All animals used for food are to be treated with potent antibiotics and exogenous growth hormones.

* The reintroduction of deadly and carcinogenic organic
pesticides that in 1991, 176 countries (including the U.S.) have banned
worldwide including 7 of the 12 worst at the Stockholm Convention on
Persistent Organic Pesticides (e.g., Hexachlorobenzene, Toxaphene, and
Aldrin) will be allowed back into food at elevated levels [4].

* Dangerous and toxic levels (0.5 ppb) of aflotoxin in milk
produced from moldy storage conditions of animal feed will be allowed.
Aflotoxin is the second most potent (non-radiation) carcinogenic
compound known to man.

* Mandatory use of growth hormones and antibiotics on all food herds, fish and flocks

* Worldwide implementation of unlabeled GMOs into crops, animals, fish and trees.

We've already seen incidences of health food stores being raided as though they were selling crystal meth instead of Vitamin C and organic vegetables.

Family farms are being driven out of business because they can't afford to keep up with the ever-increasing regulations.

Natural healers have been criminalized throughout Europe, and that criminalization is on its way to North American shores.

Death by Codex

If it was only about the almighty dollar and the building of
monopolies, one could almost comprehend the corporate greed behind Codex
Alimentarius. The plot is more sinister than even greed could create.

<blockquote>
Codex Alimentarius, quite simply, is an instrument of depopulation and control.

</blockquote>
Many prominent eugenicists, such as Bill Gates and David Rockefeller have openly promoted depopulation as a positive goal for the future.

Sickly people die off at a faster rate, dropping health care costs.
Dwindling populations consume fewer resources and leaving more for the
Elite.

Morally, this soft kill approach is more palatable than outright
attacks, like the release of viruses. There is the risk that biological
attacks could also affect the Elite.

Military attacks, like nuclear war, could have a devastating effect
on the environment, which would also negatively affect the elite. Subtly
starving the masses, without them even realizing it, is the simplest
method, and also the least likely to harm the NWO puppet masters that
are in control of the United Nations.

As the attack on the world's people becomes more obvious, the
decision makers also risk being the victims of violent revolution.
Codex also helps to cover that aspect.

If people are malnourished, they are unable to resist tyranny with
the same enthusiasm as a healthy population. They are also far more
susceptible to disease, should biological warfare be one day in the best
interests of the Elite.

It's win-win, if you happen to be a member of the Elite. The outcome doesn't look so great for the rest of us.

Henry Kissinger, the eugenicist poster child for the NWO, said it best.