Report: Rogue Nation Could “Hijack” Globalist-Patented Geo-Engineering Schemes

Report: Rogue Nation Could “Hijack” Globalist-Patented Geo-Engineering Schemes

2013 World Economic Forum Report: “(…) a country or small
group of countries precipitates an international crisis by moving ahead
with deployment or large-scale research independent of the global
community.”

In the World Economic Forum’s annual Global Risks report,
the world is being warned that a “rogue nation” or individual could
“hijack” global climate change for nefarious purposes. The report
mentions several possible scenario’s, or X-factors, which could occur in
the coming year, among which (page 57) a geoengineering nightmare,
according to the report, “in which a country or small group of countries
precipitates an international crisis by moving ahead with deployment or
large-scale research independent of the global community. The global
climate could, in effect, be hijacked by a rogue country or even a
wealthy individual, with unpredict­able costs to agriculture,
infrastructure and global stability.”

In sketching out this specter of doom, the World Economic Forum
carefully omits the fact that the concept of global climate change has
already been hijacked- in the 1960s, by megalomaniac control freaks who
admittedly used the concept of man-made climate change to force the
world to adapt draconian population control measures and other globally
regulated strangleholds. Intead, the WEF rather sketches a James
Bond-type scenario in which some goldfinger with v-shaped eyebrows in,
say, Iran sends out fleets of airplanes buzzing around to inject the
atmosphere with chemicals.

Because “the funding landscape for this kind of science remains
spotty”, the WEF states that this “leaves a gap for unregulated
experimentation by “rogue” parties. For example, an island state
threatened with rising sea levels may decide they have nothing to lose,
or a well funded individual with good intentions may take matters into
their own hands. There are signs that this is already starting to
occur.”

“Recent studies”, the report goes on to state, “suggest that a small
fleet of aircraft could inject a million tonnes of sulphur compounds
into the stratosphere – enough to offset roughly half of the global
warming experienced to date – for US$1-2 billion annually.”

Indeed. In 2010 David Keith, director of the Institute for
Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, has proposed releasing
engineered nano-sized discs in the earth’s atmosphere to “offset global
warming”- and that for just $ 1 billion of your taxpayer-money annually.

“You could manipulate the Earth’s climate at large scale for a cost
that’s of the order of $1 billion a year. It sounds like a lot of money,
but compared to the costs of managing other environmental problems or
climate change, that is peanuts.”, Keith told Nanowerk News.

Keith also made clear that mentioning the annual cost is not
necessarily an argument pro or con, but an “indication” rather, “that
risk, not cost, will be the deciding issue.”

Until now, scientists have mainly looked at injecting the
volcano-mimicking sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere as a way to
“get the maximum cooling benefit.” This new nano-particle proposal of
spraying “levitating” engineered nano-particles in the atmosphere might
have serious drawbacks, Keith acknowledges:

“A downside of both these new ideas is they would do something that
nature has never seen before. It’s easier to think of new ideas than to
understand their effectiveness and environmental risks.”

On the upside, Keith says:

“(…) the distribution of engineered nano-particles above the Earth
could be more controlled and less likely to harm the planet’s protective
ozone layer.”

The risks that Keith is willing to take with the earth is illustrated
by a speech he gave for TED (Technology, Entertainment, and Design).
Other speakers for TED have included Al Gore, Hans Rosling and Sir Ken
Robinson:

“We could make the particles migrate to over the poles (…) which
would have minimal bad impacts in the mid part of the planet, where we
live, and do the maximum job of what we might need to do which is
cooling the poles in case of planetary emergency, if you like.”

“The one thing about this”, Keith states, “is that it gives us
extraordinary leverage, this.. this improved science and engineering
will- whether we like it or not- give us more and more leverage to
affect the planet, to control the planet, to give us weather and climate
control- not because we plan it, not because we want it, just because
science delivers it to us bit by bit. With better knowledge of the way
the system works and better engineering tools to affect it.”

Controlling the planet, no less, and at a minimal expense to the
taxpayer- if you call $ 1 billion a year minimal. Another proponent of
elaborate geo-engineering schemes is none other than John P. Holdren:
Obama’s current science czar. During a keynote address
before a gathering of Goldman Sachs luminaries on Energy, Environment
and the Financial Markets in 2007, Holdren proposed several options to
“combat climate change”. The most remarkable of which include (page 43)
““Scrub” greenhouse gases from the atmosphere technologically” and
““Geo-engineering” to create cooling effects offsetting greenhouse
heating.”

As
we know, this is not the first time Holdren proposed spraying the
atmosphere with whatever particles needed to deflect sunlight for
cooling purposes. The interesting thing regarding his PowerPoint
presentation before the international bankers, is that it preceded his
statements in favor of geoengineering in 2009 and the subsequent
outrage, which ultimately caused him to back-pedal on his proposals.
Despite the controversy, Holdren maintained at a MIT-seminar that the geo-engineering option should not be discarded.

The elitist Council on Foreign Relations wholeheartedly agrees with
him. In the course of 2008, the CFR held several workshops dedicated to “Planetary Scale Geoenigineering” efforts after painting the environmental situation as being direr than the facts suggest.

Holdren’s participation in the Goldman Sachs conference was no
incidental occurrence. In September of 2006, when Holdren was still
director of the Woods Hole Research Center, he teamed up with the
representative of the Goldman Sachs Center for Environmental Management.
This partnership would supposedly “enable the Woods Hole Research
Center to broaden and deepen its efforts to understand the ways that
tropical forests contribute to human well-being (…)”. Initiator of the
partnership was the eugenics liaison front of the Global Clinton
Initiative, which donated generously to stimulate the partnership. As
Holdren explained: “It’s particularly gratifying that we developed this
project with Goldman Sachs as part of the Clinton Global Initiative- a
farsighted effort of the former President to stimulate new partnerships
among businesses, researchers, and public-interest organizations to
address the great challenges in global health, environment, and economic
development”.

Besides the fact that we learn of more and more Obama people being
extremely tight to Goldman Sachs, the 2007 PowerPoint presentation
proves that the geoengineering-option was already on Holdren’s mind
before he assumed the function of science czar. His presentation also
clearly shows that Mr. Holdren is the New World Order’s favorite mad
scientist.

In the first months of the Obama presidency, Holdren alluded that the
subject had come up during White House discussions. Later, when the
Associated Press reported on it, Holdren hastily back-pedaled on the
subject, saying: “we have to look at the possibilities and understand
them because if we get desperate enough it will be considered. I also
made clear that this my personal view, not Administration policy.”

In 2007 Holdren did not yet suffer the burden of public office. This
allowed him to be quite frank about his ideas, just as he was in 1977,
when he warmed to the idea of a “planetary regime” to scale back the
human population. He also, by the way, proposed putting chemicals in the
water supply to ensure decline in fertility and chipping people to
control their reproductive capabilities. Now the World Economic Forum
confirms that geoengineering schemes are patented by the “global
community”, decrying anyone outside its sphere of influence to use their
inventions at pleasure.
Source:-
http://www.infowars.com/report-rogue-nation-could-hijack-globalist-patented-geo-engineering-schemes/