Is UK Defense Contractor Planning Syrian WMD False Flag?

Is UK Defense Contractor Planning Syrian WMD False Flag?

Unconfirmed
"leaked" documents indicate Washington-approved, Qatari-funded false
flag attack using Libyan chemical weapons in Homs, Syria.

Tony Cartalucci, Contributor
Activist Post

Documents allegedly "hacked" belonging to UK-based defense contractor Britam (official website here)
appear to show the company considering an offer from Qatar to use
Libyan chemical weapons in Homs, Syria in order to frame both the Syrian
and Russian governments. The plan involves using Britam's Ukrainian
mercenaries and Soviet-era chemical weapon shells brought in from
Libya's large, Al Qaeda-linked, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)
controlled arsenals.



The e-mail reads:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Phil </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">We've
got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an
attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington. </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">We'll
have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya
similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our
Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.

Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion? </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">Kind regards
David
</blockquote>It should be remembered that this is not confirmed - and
there is most likely no way that it can ever be confirmed. However, in
light of recent, and continuous attempts by the Israelis
and NATO to justify a military intervention in Syria based on fears of
"chemical weapons," and considering how a nearly decade-long war and
occupation was fought in neighboring Iraq under similar and patently false pretenses, every potential piece of evidence should be taken seriously.

It should also be remembered that during the Iraq
War, British special forces were caught carrying out false flag
attacks, dressed as sectarian extremists in Basra, Iraq, and shooting
at Iraqi policemen. After the British soldiers were arrested, the British army attacked the police station
they were being held at to free them. The precedence of Western
nations using false flag operations, including terrorism, to achieve
geopolitical objectives beyond their borders most certainly exists.


The Libyan Connection

Mention of acquiring chemical weapons from Libya is particularly troubling. Libya's arsenal had fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists
with NATO assistance in 2011 in the culmination of efforts to
overthrow the North African nation . Since then, Libya's militants led
by commanders of Al Qaeda's Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists across the Arab World, from as far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.

In addition to small arms, heavier weapons are also making their way
through this extensive network. The Washington Post in their article, "Libyan missiles on the loose," reported:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">"Two former CIA counterterrorism officers told
me last week that technicians recently refurbished 800 of these
man-portable air-defense systems (known as MANPADS)
— some for an African jihadist group called Boko Haram that is often
seen as an ally of al-Qaeda — for possible use against commercial jets
flying into Niger, Chad and perhaps Nigeria."</blockquote>While
undoubtedly these weapons are also headed to Niger, Chad, and perhaps
Nigeria, they are veritably headed to Syria. Libyan LIFG terrorists are confirmed to be flooding into Syria from Libya. In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, "Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group," would report:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli
Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting
Group, "met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the
border with Turkey," said a military official working with Mr
Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him
there."</blockquote>Another Telegraph article, "Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels," would admit
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's
new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their
insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, The Daily
Telegraph has learned.


At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and
included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested "assistance" from
the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially
volunteers. </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">
"There
is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters
to Syria," said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you
will see." </blockquote>Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since.



Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed
terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),
addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan
brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian
government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is
known as "foreign invasion."

Washington Post's reported "loose missiles" in Libya are now turning up
on the battlefield in Syria. While outfits like the Guardian, in their
article "Arms and the Manpads: Syrian rebels get anti-aircraft missiles,"
are reporting the missiles as being deployed across Syria, they have
attempted to downplay any connection to Libya's looted arsenal and the
Al Qaeda terrorists that have imported them. In contrast, Times has
published open admissions from terrorists themselves admitting they are
receiving heavy weapons including surface-to-air missiles from Libya.

In Time's article, "Libya’s Fighters Export Their Revolution to Syria," it is reported:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Some Syrians are more frank about the
assistance the Libyans are providing. “They have heavier weapons than
we do,” notes Firas Tamim, who has traveled in rebel-controlled areas
to keep tabs on foreign fighters. “They brought these weapons to Syria,
and they are being used on the front lines.” Among the arms Tamim has
seen are Russian-made surface-to-air missiles, known as the SAM 7.

Libyan fighters largely brush off questions about weapon transfers, but
in December they claimed they were doing just that. “We are in the
process of collecting arms in Libya,” a Libyan fighter in Syria told the
French daily Le Figaro. “Once this is done, we will have to find a way to bring them here.”</blockquote>Clearly NATO intervention in Libya has left a vast, devastating arsenal in the hands of sectarian extremists, led by US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed
terrorist organization LIFG, that is now exporting these weapons and
militants to NATO's other front in Syria. It is confirmed that both
Libyan terrorists and weapons are crossing the Turkish-Syrian border,
with NATO assistance, and it is now clear that heavy weapons, including
anti-aircraft weapons have crossed the border, too.

The Guardian reported in their November 2011 article, "Libyan chemical weapons stockpiles intact, say inspectors," that:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">Libya's stockpiles of mustard gas and
chemicals used to make weapons are intact and were not stolen during
the uprising that toppled Muammar Gaddafi, weapons inspectors have
said.</blockquote>But also reported that:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">The abandonment or disappearance of some
Gaddafi-era weapons has prompted concerns that such firepower could
erode regional security if it falls into the hands of Islamist
militants or rebels active in north Africa. Some fear they could be
used by Gaddafi loyalists to spread instability in Libya. </blockquote><blockquote class="tr_bq">Last
month Human Rights Watch urged Libya's ruling national transitional
council to take action over large numbers of heavy weapons, including
surface-to-air missiles, it said were lying unguarded more than two
months after Gaddafi was overthrown.

On Wednesday the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said the UN would
send experts to Libya to help ensure nuclear material and chemical
weapons did not fall into the wrong hands.</blockquote>And while inspectors claim that Libya's chemical weapons are in the "government's" hands and not "extremists'," it is clear by the Libyan government's own admission, that they themselves are involved in sending fighters and weapons into Syria.

Bottom Line

It cannot be said for certain whether the e-mail allegedly sent by
Britam is genuine, but the West is openly subverting Syria through the
funding and arming of terrorists from across the Arab World. Terrorists
are confirmed to be moving through NATO-member Turkey, with the Turkish
government's explicit assistance. Heavy weapons are both being
supplied and paid for by the West, and likewise brought across Syria's
borders through NATO-member Turkey.


Despite this, the momentum of NATO's armed, proxy-aggression toward
Syria has been broken multiple times. Threats of a no-fly zone are
waning as NATO's proxies are neutralized with little left to establish a
no-fly zone over. The fear now for NATO and its various partners
across the region, from Israel to Erdogan in Turkey, to Qatar and Saudi
Arabia, is that there will be nothing left of the so-called "Free
Syrian Army" (FSA) to intervene on behalf of.

With time running out and the Syrian people still stalwartly defending
their nation, it is possible that the desperate measures described in
the alleged e-mail from Britam have been considered - as the rhetorical
groundwork to accommodate such measures has already been long-ago laid
out by the complicit Western media. The purpose of exposing this
alleged e-mail is not necessarily to accuse Britam, but to remind
readers to be vigilant. And should "chemical weapons" be used in Syria
in an apparent joint Syrian-Russian operation, Britam, the United
Kingdom, and Qatar should be the first suspects that come to mind.

Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/is-uk-defense-contractor-planning.html