Why Do All Vaccine Advocates Refuse To Answer or Justify This Question

Why Do All Vaccine Advocates Refuse To Answer or Justify This Question?


Regardless of their reputation, credentials, experience or
background, proponents of vaccines can never answer or justify one
simple question: Why are the pharmacokinetics, specifically the rates of
bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of
vaccine ingredients including any of the toxic extraneous components
never studied?

To the ordinarily sane person,
injecting a heavy metal such as mercury into the human body (no matter
how small or insignificant an amount) seems counterproductive to the
advancement of health. There is no such thing as a safe dose of any poison, especially mercury.

To add to this insanity, 140 countries agreed on a mercury treaty that does not remove it from vaccines. Have we all lost our minds?


There are dozens of scientific studies on the adverse effects of thimerosal (a mercury based preservative used in vaccines) which have verified its toxicity to living cells and the human body.


Although the FDA gave a two year deadline to remove
thimerosal from vaccines after it was banned in 1997, it
continued to appear in vaccine formulations and ironically the FDA
is now supporting these drugs, not prohibiting them. Year after
year, thimerosal appears in influenza vaccinations just in time for
every flu season. WHY???

In 2009, eight out of ten H1N1 vaccines had thimerosal. Last year's 2011/2012 flu vaccine season saw three out of five FDA approved vaccines containing thimerosal. This year, the 2012/2013 season offers three out of six flu vaccines which contain thimerosal and all are FDA approved of course.

Research from the Environment International Journal showed that women
with higher levels of mercury exposure are more than twice as
likely to have elevated levels of antibodies that are associated
with autoimmune disorders such as arthritis and lupus.

In sufficient doses, methylmercury can affect the developing nervous system in the developing fetus and in growing children. In adults, elevated methylmercury exposure can lead to neurological problems, such as memory loss and tremors. Recent studies show that methylmercury exposures can also lead to cardiovascular and immune effects.
Thimerosal is only one of many toxic ingredients that appear
in vaccines. There are plenty of others including but not limited to: Formaldehyde (carcinogen), neomycin (immunotoxin), polymyxin (neurotoxin), gentamicin sulfate (nephrotoxin), monosodium glutamate (neurotoxin, excitotoxin), sodium deoxycholate (immunotoxin), hydrocortisone (myelin degenerator), octoxynol 10 (immunotoxin), polysorbate 80 (sterile agent), and beta-propiolactone (carcinogen), polyethylene glycol (system toxin). Keep in mind, this is just a small list of a dozen toxic excipients in vaccine formulations.

The real question is why are neither the short or long-term
pharmacokinetic effects which study the bodily absorption,
distribution, metabolism and excretion of vaccines
and their ingredients never examined
or analyzed?

Why are non-clinical toxicological findings such as the
carcinogenesis, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility never evaluated?

How can a physician possibly inform
a patient of any risks regarding vaccines if their formula
constituents and their pharmacokinetics have never been studied on human
beings?

Ok, maybe it's more than one, but why will nobody ever answer these questions?

Take your pick at almost any vaccine insert or research your own, and look under the heading Pharmacokinetics or Non-Clinical Toxicology
and you will find either no listing of these at all, or a listing of
them with the statement "not evaluated" or "not clinically significant"
meaning they haven't studied it, or they took an extremely small sample
size/term so that essentially the long-term safety evaluation is
clinically impossible to determine. It's their scapegoat because they
know any long-term pharmacokinetic study, whether before clinical
efficacy trials or after, will show how harmful many of these
ingredients actually are once they bioaccumulate after days, weeks,
months and even years.

Why do they not want us to know the determination of the fate
of these substances being administered to human beings?

Forget about what side of the fence you are on in terms of vaccines.
Shouldn't any person receiving a vaccine that has been designated as
safe be fully informed of the risks including the non-clinical
toxicological implications or at least how the ingredients will
generally behave within the human body? If the answer is yes, then why
are these specifics never studied or evaluated to any depth?

Dave Mihalovic
is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine
research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to
treatment.


Source:-
http://preventdisease.com/news/13/031413_Why-Do-All-Vaccine-Advocates-Refuse-To-Answer-or-Justify-This-Question.shtml