Whooping Cough Rapid Rise After 20-Year Use of Poor Quality Vaccines

Whooping Cough Rapid Rise After 20-Year Use of Poor Quality Vaccines







Heather Callaghan

Image

Activist Post

The rate of whooping cough, or pertussis, has exploded in America in the
last few years. A brand new study confirms what scientists already
expected. They confirmed that the burgeoning comeback of whooping cough
is due to introducing new, "safer" vaccines 20 years ago. Safer, meaning
fewer side effects and minus the previous toxin that was used, but not
safe for long-term protection from disease.

Pertussis bacteria affects upper respiration and creates shortness of
breath. The disease, which can be fatal to babies, actually almost
disappeared in the late '70s - so why did newer vaccines keep appearing?
It seems to have caused a type of resistance. The weaker vaccine has
caused damage; arguably more than foregoing the vaccine altogether.

By the '80s it was believed to be more hushed, spreading undiagnosed. In
20 years, however, it has "bounced back with a vengeance." Europe is
seeing the same problem. Last year in the U.S., there were 40,000 cases,
and strong strains among kids in 2010. California, for instance, saw an
epidemic of it in 2010, especially among their Latino community - the situation was rife with calls for mandatory vaccination - for the very vaccine that could be spiking the disease.

Before the '90s, kids would receive a whole-cell
vaccine, made from pertussis bacteria called Bordetella pertussis. The
bacteria were killed by formalin or other chemicals. The vaccines also
contained a toxin that would cause infants to have fever, severe pain at
jab site and would even get febrile seizures, fainting and turn pale,
"floppy," and unresponsive.

At that time, parents sued the manufacturers successfully saying this
whole-cell vaccine led to long-term brain damage. A 1991 Institute of
Medicine report tried to refute that claim, but by then many pertussis
vaccine makers scurried out of the market. Then, Congress made a federal
vaccine injury compensation program for vaccine-injured families.


Now, the vaccines are "acellular" consisting of refined pertussis
proteins that are supposed to create immunity, but without the toxic
effects. It is interesting to note that the toxic ingredients often
found in vaccines such as thimerasol (mercury) and aluminum are
adjuvants - carriers to make the vaccine more effective. So the strength
of it is actually based on its toxicity. Similarly, chemotherapy's
strength (or efficiency) in zapping cells (and immunity) is because of
its toxicity - that's why patients are often told to avoid things like
green tea! It would almost undo the chemo, or weaken its effects,
prolonging the procedure.

Northern California physicians at Kaiser Permanente studied results
comparing the old versus new. The shots are a four-dose series called
DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) given to children before age two.
Children born between '94 and '99 are when Kaiser was gradually
introducing the new vaccines. Children studied either had only the old,
only the new, or a combination of both.

Of 1037 children in the main study, 138 who had received the new, weaker
acellular shots, got pertussis during California's 2010-2011 epidemic.
Children receiving only the acellular vaccine were more than 5.6 times likely
to become ill, mainly with pertussis, than children receiving the old
whole-cell vaccine. What's more, in a different recent study in
Australia, the kids receiving acellular vaccines were six times more likely to get sick, versus the old. And another looking at California found an eight-fold increase in illness.

I want to emphasize that the epidemic is occurring among people who
received vaccines. Because during an epidemic we will hear all kinds of
media stressing an epidemic and why we should get vaccinated, or else we
are so irresponsible to the rest of the population. And now we
are teetering on the beginnings of forced vaccination for the "good of
public safety."

One author, pediatrician Nicola Klein says:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">We're now finding out that the acellular
vaccine's doesn't offer protection for as long. It does work well in the
short term. But there was definitely a tradeoff in phasing out the
whole-cell vaccine.</blockquote>Interestingly,
whole-cell vaccines are still used in lower-income countries where they
are seeing less incidents of aggressive come-back pertussis.
Researchers attribute that to more antigens - proteins triggering the
immune system - considered better by allopathic standards than the
acellular vaccines used in the last 20 years, attributing to more
disease. (see a better solution below)

In some international meetings to discuss the problem, some wanted to go
back to whole-cell vaccines. Of course the preferred solution is to
create a whole new generation of vaccines! And that could take a decade -
major fail!

Canadian pediatrician, Scott Halperin, said there's no going back to the whole-cell kind and:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">It had to go - It's a vaccine that would not
be accepted in the societies we have in North America and Europe. As
much pertussis as we're seeing now, we're still seeing in most places
pretty good control in the very young. We're seeing lapsed immunity in
school-age kids and we have to solve that. But those kids aren't dying.</blockquote>That's
pretty flimsy - children are the most at risk for death from
contracting whooping cough. But even if they aren't keeling over, this
is only the beginning of the effects. If these children, now older, are
contracting a serious disease that almost disappeared - what will their
immunity look like at age 30, 40, 50?

Halperin said:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">The scientific community back in the 1990s
felt that it had pertussis solved ... We're now seeing that we don't
have a solution yet.</blockquote>It's obvious that public safety actually falls last on the list if these newer vaccines were not studied carefully before they
came on the scene in the '90s. In fact, public safety has now been
effectively threatened. People coming down with the same disease they
were vaccinated from is actually an alarming sign of immune dysfunction -
most likely exacerbated by the vaccine. If we're only just now
discovering this after 20 years of using them, it's safe to say that we
should have a choice to vaccinate or not and be able to draw our own
conclusions, rather than be at the whim of doctors who are repeating CDC
warnings and listening to their sponsored drug makers.

I just want to briefly suggest looking into homeopathic flu nosodes
as a much, much safer and profound way to alleviate disease - no part
of the disease exists in them. They were around since the 1800s but were
quelled by the coming pharmaceuticals that could be patented. Even
Louis Pasteur reportedly admitted on his death bed that the theory
behind the homeopathic solutions (Terrain theory) was more sound than
his belief in Germ theory which is what promoted vaccine use from the
beginning. And please see a good naturopathic doctor to build that immunity, alleviate toxicity and empower yourself in the face of disease epidemics.

source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/06/whooping-cough-rapid-rise-after-20-year.html