Will Any Member of Congress Get PO’d about Vaccine Damage?

Will Any Member of Congress Get PO’d about Vaccine Damage?

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

Everyone by now undoubtedly has heard of the chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Dianne Feinstein’s growing rift with the CIA about its hacking into her committee staffers’ computers. Senator Feinstein obviously is concerned about the separation-of-powers principles embodied in the U.S. Constitution, plus the CIA’s obvious interference with congressional oversight regarding Congress—but how about taxpayers’ constitutional rights.

Senator Feinstein is miffed – and rightfully so – when she says, “Besides the Constitutional implications, the CIA search may also have violated the Fourth Amendment, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as Executive Order 12333, which prohibits the CIA from conducting domestic searches or surveillance.” Okay, all well and good, but there are other agencies within the federal government that “act up” and about which Congressional members apparently are not concerned.

One particular agency that comes to mind is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Congress definitely has oversight over the FDA and should be duly concerned, but seemingly ignores FDA’s incompetence and apparent collusion with vested interests. At times, FDA’s actions truly remind one of a spoiled child who likes to bully others. FDA even doesn’t abide by the laws!

Why is the FDA a non-law-abiding agency? One of the more outrageous claims about that is made not by me, but by a Washington, DC, constitutional attorney, Jonathan Emord, in his 2010 book Global Censorship of Health Information (Sentinel Press, Washington, DC) on page 16, when he says, “FDA refuses to honor five decisions holding its censorship unconstitutional.”



Furthermore, Emord says that an attorney in the FDA Chief Counsel’s office made this really shocking statement regarding a court order to FDA, “Jonathan, the FDA will never abide by the Pearson decision.” Despite Jonathan’s noting it was a final and binding decision—an order of the court—the FDA attorney said, “That may be so, but I am telling you the FDA will never abide by that court decision, never, ever.” [Page 17] Attorney Emord tells us, “His words pierced to the very core of my being. Here was an agency’s legal officer telling me that the agency was, intentionally, lawless.” [Page 17]

Question to Congress: What will you do to make the FDA abide by the Pearson decision?

As I contend in my October 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, the FDA apparently is a non-law-abiding agency that acts with impunity and considers itself ‘omnipotent’ since it apparently was an enabler in effectuating a carte blanche status from Congress for the pharmaceutical industry with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660).

Some people refer to that law as Big Pharma’s “get out of jail free” card. As a result of that vested-interest-coup, Congress seemingly has pulled a perennial Pontius-Pilate-hand-washing approach about getting involved in investigating the problems with vaccines causing horrific damages to innocent vaccinees – especially children, which the CDC/FDA’s vaccine-post-marketing safety surveillance program VAERS confirms by the hundreds of thousands, and yet no one does anything. Why?

As an aside, General Motors currently faces legal, ethical, and good manufacturing problems because in its 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt car “the ignition switch can shut off a car’s engine and electrical system, and disable its air bags.” [1] Thirteen deaths have been attributed to that malfunction “that engineers and regulators had been alerted to years ago.” [1] That GM issue exemplifies what’s legally and ethically wrong when “big businesses are too big to be allowed to fail.” That includes vaccine manufacturers, those businesses that were given extra-special privileges by Congress that preclude legal action against vaccine makers, plus make vaccinees bear the brunt of apparent pseudo-science, fudged and/or manipulated research and/or approval filings, which vaccine safety advocates have been questioning for years! Furthermore, the issue is exacerbated by hundreds of thousands of VEARS reports about which no one at the CDC/FDA or Congress investigates, including deaths attributed to vaccines.

If 13 deaths from a GM car malfunction can get attention, what should 157 deaths attributed to just one vaccine, the HPV, get?

Moreover, the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims has handed down close to $3Billion in vaccine damage claims settlements. [2] That, alone, corroborates vaccines DO cause damage. Comparatively few claimants receive awards, whereas thousands of vaccine-damaged individuals are left to fend for themselves after having been badgered into receiving vaccines by physicians, agency mandates, and schools only to suffer life-altering adverse events, especially in the case of the efficacy-questionable HPV vaccines. Check out this from the Gardasil® webpage:

Quote :

GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone, nor will it protect against diseases caused by other HPV types or against diseases not caused by HPV. GARDASIL does not prevent all types of cervical cancer, so it’s important for women to continue routine cervical cancer screenings. GARDASIL does not treat cancer or genital warts. [3]

Juxtapose that information against the horrors happening to HPV vaccinees as documented at the following websites:

Quote :

SaneVax, Inc., a vaccine safety advocacy organization http://sanevax.org/ 

Quote :

Truth About Gardasil, a website documenting Gardasil Girls’ deaths http://truthaboutgardasil.org/ 

Quote :

Time for the Truth about Gardasil by Dr. Joseph Mercola, DO http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/17/time-for-the-truth-about- gardasil.aspx 

Quote :

The Truth About Gardasil.com, a law firm http://www.thetruthaboutgardasil.com/

According to a study, which took into account incidents of adverse events reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since the drug’s introduction in 2006, there was an average of 53.9 VAERS reports per 100,000 vaccine doses. Of these, 40 percent occurred on the day of vaccination, and 6.2 percent were serious, including 32 reports of death.

Another area where the FDA apparently is remiss concerns vaccine safety issues. As Paul G King, PhD, said in the Introduction to Vaccination Voodoo,

Quote :

For the definition of “safety” for a biological product, the FDA purports to rely on the definition set forth in Title 21 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, “…the relative freedom from harmful effect to persons affected, directly or indirectly, by a product when prudently administered, taking into consideration the character of the product in relation to the condition of the recipient at the time.” 

Quote :

Rather than being science-based, most of the current claims concerning safety and effectiveness of vaccines are more the unfounded beliefs of developers, purveyors, advertisers, and defenders of our current vaccines and vaccination programs than anything else.

Furthermore, FDA does not require as part of its safety studies that each vaccine be tested or evaluated for the following: carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductively toxic effects! That’s safety? Additionally, if not ironically, every vaccine package insert contains language that says something similar to what is found in Merck’s Proquad® vaccine insert:

Quote :

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 

Quote :

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 

Quote :

ProQuad has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility. [4]

Why would anyone want to take something into his/her body when the manufacturer states that the product has not been evaluated for the above health and disease concerns?

So really, how safe are vaccines, if toxic chemicals and neurotoxins, in particular, are not evaluated for being capable of producing cancers, birth defects, or impairing one’s ability to have children (fertility)? Shouldn’t monitoring that be the prime reason for the FDA’s existence and to enforce the Precautionary Principle? And yet Congress, who has oversight over FDA, allows ostensible bad manufacturing practices (no testing for mycoplasmas [5]) and apparent vested-interest abuses to continue in the name of vaccine science.

Therefore, who in Congress will become PO’d enough to do something about investigating vaccines and their ingredients? Who will revisit Public Law 99-660 to correct the inequities at the vaccine court? Who will stand up to the FDA and Big Pharma to require accurate independent science rather than Big Pharma-produced studies that always say their products are safe? Who will take seriously that neurotoxic chemicals in vaccines apparently are contributing to neurobehavioral effects and problems, since they contain numerous toxic chemicals?

According to the U.S. CDC, 11 percent of 4 to 17 year-olds in the USA are affected with ADHD, a 42% increase between the years 2003-04 to 2011-12. [6] See my article about a recent Harvard study claiming chemicals cause neurobehavioral effects.

Vaccines contain numerous chemicals e.g., formaldehyde/Formalin, 2-Phenoxyethanol, phenol, glutaraldehyde, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, etc., plus Thimerosal (ethylmercury 49.6%), and aluminum in four formulations. How’s that for starters? If a parent gave those to a child, that parent would be charged with child abuse! How come Big Pharma can get away with it all while kids are getting sicker and sicker, year after year?

Senator Feinstein, can you – or any member of Congress – get your dander up about kids being harmed by vaccines?


http://www.activistpost.com/2014/03/will-any-member-of-congress-get-pod.html