Measles Outbreaks Centered in the Vaccinated: Studies Show Vaccine Is Ineffective

Measles Outbreaks Centered in the Vaccinated: Studies Show Vaccine Is Ineffective













Evidence from government health agencies and medical
journals clearly documents that the measles vaccine is ineffective. So
what is the official response? The bastion of “evidence-based
medicine” ignores its own evidence and calls for more vaccinations, of
course!

Without further ado, here are studies and government agency
announcements documenting that measles outbreaks have hit the vaccinated
and even been centered on them:
Measles (Rubeola) in Previously Immunized Children, Pediatrics Vol. 46 No. 3 September 1970, pp. 397-402

This study goes back 40 years and documents that the lack of efficacy in the measles vaccine is nothing new. It stated:
<blockquote>The analysis of serologic data supported the contention
that the outbreak was causally related to defective protection
associated with the use of vaccine plus globulin in infants. It also demonstrated persistence of CF antibody many years after immunization and suggested the presence of a booster phenomenon.
A review of the clinical illness of the 25 children who had been given the vaccine and 22 who had not revealed little difference in the severity of the disease.</blockquote>Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students — Illinois, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 1984 Report

The
CDC investigated an outbreak of measles from 9 December 1983 to 13
January 1984. It centered in a school of 411 students where 100% of
them had been vaccinated. The study confirmed their vaccination
histories. The initial case was in a 17 year-old student, and the source
of his infection was not discovered. The more students were in
contact with him, the more likely that they succumbed to measles.
The CDC entered an editorial note:
<blockquote>This outbreak demonstrates that transmission of measles can
occur within a school population with a documented immunization level
of 100%. This level was validated during the outbreak investigation.
Previous investigations of measles outbreaks among highly immunized
populations have revealed risk factors such as improper storage or
handling of vaccine, vaccine administered to children under 1 year of
age, use of globulin with vaccine, and use of killed virus vaccine.
However, these risk factors did not adequately explain the occurrence
of this outbreak.</blockquote>They attempt to blame a cluster of vaccine failures, though that never goes past the point of conjecture.
A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. American Journal of Public Health (1991)

Currently, the CDC schedules the MMR (measles mumps rubella) vaccine at 12-15 months of age. However, this study says:
<blockquote>Students vaccinated at 12-14 months of age were at
increased risk compared to those vaccinated at greater than or equal to
15 months.</blockquote>This study followed an outbreak of 84 cases of
measles at a Colorado college where over 98% of the students had been
documented to have “adequate measles immunity, based on previous
measles infection, live measles vaccine on or after the first birthday,
or serologic evidence of immunity. At least one of these proofs of
immunity was required for entry into the school.
Explosive School-based Measles Outbreak, American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998

This study investigated the degree of prevention provided by measles vaccines. They found:
<blockquote>Total protection against measles might not be achievable,
even among revaccinees, when children are confronted with intense
exposure to measles virus.</blockquote>Largest Measles Outbreak in the Americas since 2000: Quebec Ongoing Epidemic, IDSA Boston Oral Abstract, 2011

Between
1 January and 3 August 2011, 727 measles cases were notified in
Canada. 65% of the cases were in young people aged 10-19 years. Only
1.8% were over age 40. The study concludes:
<blockquote>While this still ongoing outbreak feeds largely on
unvaccinated individuals, the high proportion of cases who received two
doses raises concerns on vaccine effectiveness.</blockquote>This is
rather strange. Notice that the percentage of people over age 40 who
got measles is very small. This is the least vaccinated group by a
significant margin. The age group that came down with the highest
percentage of cases was aged 10-19 years, a group that was mostly
vaccinated, but had generally had the vaccines a few years earlier.
The implication of this is that the measles vaccine provides only
limited protection, and that the limited protection lasts for only a
short time. However, natural immunity, the sort that people over age 40
are significantly more likely to have, generally results in permanent
immunity.

The statement that the outbreak “feeds largely on unvaccinated
individuals” seems rather casual. To blame people who haven’t been
vaccinated for disease in those who have is absurd on its face. That,
though, is the sort of pseudo logic that’s often used to push vaccines.
Summation

These reports document three primary facts about the measles vaccine:

• It is far from complete protection, even shortly after the vaccine is given.
  
• It loses efficacy rapidly, with much of it wearing off over a couple of years.
  
• It’s probably useless to give it to children under age 15 months.
  

The third point, the lack of effectiveness in the measles vaccine
for children under age 15 months, should no longer be surprising. A
newborn’s immune system does not function in the same way as an adult’s.
Newborns do not develop antibodies as older children and adults do.
That fact is now being used to pressure people into getting vaccinated.
The reason given is to “cocoon” babies from diseases.

What they fail to mention is that, prior to mass vaccination, newborns
faced very little risk of contracting measles. Their mothers generally
had natural immunity from having had the diseases themselves, thereby
developing lifelong protection and passing it on to their babies.
Thus, newborns were protected until they’d reached an age that allowed
them to respond to infections and develop their own immunity.

However, little or no protection is provided to newborns when their
mothers have only vaccines’ artificially-induced antibodies. So, the need to cocoon newborns from diseases like measles is a direct result of the vaccines!
As can be seen from the work of those who push vaccinations, the
measles vaccine is of limited value. What efficacy is provided lasts
only a short time. There is a known and significant risk of adverse
effects from the vaccine itself. Revaccinating again and again and
again—which appears to be where things are headed—carries serious risks
of neurological damage, among other life-altering damage.

As a result, scientists have become pseudo scientists. Even when, as in
the examples given here, their results show that vaccinations may not
be effective, they still spin them to push modern medicine’s paradigm.
Whatever the results, vaccinations will be promoted. If the
vaccinated are shown not to be protective, then the claim will be that
more vaccines need to be given. If it becomes clear that it won’t be
possible to do more vaccinating, then fear mongering and guilt will be
promoted.
Modern medicine has decided that vaccinations will be promoted, and it
appears to make no difference how much harm they do or even whether
they’re particularly effective. Vaccines are big money makers for
doctors, who have an excuse to call children into their offices on a
regular basis. They’ve become the planned future of Big Pharma as their
blockbuster drugs go out of patent and little new is in the pipeline.
Nothing, no amount of harm and no facts of inefficacy are allowed to
stand in the way of the profit-making vaccine juggernaut.

Definition of juggernaut, from the American Heritage Dictionary: Something,
such as a belief or institution, that elicits blind and destructive
devotion or to which people are ruthlessly sacrificed.



Source:-
http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-04-07/measles-outbreaks-centered-in-the-vaccinated-studies-show-vaccine-is-ineffective/