Doctors Change Names of Diseases When Vaccines Do Not Work

Doctors Change Names of Diseases When Vaccines Do Not Work

Doctors around the world are being faced with children catching the
diseases they have been vaccinated against. Rather than diagnosing these
children correctly, professionals have discovered that the doctors
are giving the diseases new names. This suggests a cover up is going
on and the vaccinations we are all being told are safe and effective
are in fact completely useless.
Vaccinations are now being given to children to keep them safe from
every disease known to man. There appears to be a vaccination for
everything from polio to a broken finger nail. However, many
professionals now believe that the vaccinations are actually causing
the diseases they are supposed to prevent.

It appears that they could be right because news has just been
released that 47,500 children became paralyzed after polio vaccinations
in India in 2011. According to Dr Jacob a member of the national
technical advisory group on immunization and of the working group on
the food and drug regulation in 2011 after receiving the polio
vaccination, an additional 47,500 children were newly paralyzed, over
and above the standard rate of 2 children per 100,000 non-polio AFP
(acute flaccid paralysis) cases. (1)

Dr Viera Scheibner is a professional who would not be at all surprised
at the above figures. She has firmly believed for many years that
contrary to the belief that vaccinations prevent children from
becoming ill, they are causing children to catch the diseases that they
are being vaccinated against. She best explains this in her extremely
well written letter published recently in the British Medical Journal
(BMJ). (2) Her letter on the subject of polio vaccinations contains
outstanding research and opens a gigantic can of worms that will be
difficult for the pharmaceutical industries to ignore. In answer to an
article titled ‘Polio eradication: a complex end game – Polio Eradication by Vaccination,’ shewrote:


“Polio eradication by vaccination?
Let me quote some original seminal medical research.
Anderson
et al. (1951) in his article “Poliomyelitis occurring after antigen
injections” (Pediatrics; 7(6): 741-759) wrote “During the last year
several investigators have reported the occurrence of poliomyelitis
after a few weeks after injection of some antigen. Martin in England
noted 25 cases in which paralysis of a single limb occurred within 28
days of injection of antigen into that limb, and two cases following
penicillin injections.”She continued:

“Geffen, studying the 1949
poliomyelitis cases in London, observed 30 patients who had received an
antigen within four weeks, noting also that the paralysis involved
especially the extremity into which the injection had been given.

Dr Scheibner provided many examples of researched evidence
proving that vaccinations have been causing cases of paralysis and
polio for many years.

She could be right because concerns were being raised even during the polio vaccines early days.

In 1954, during testing, Dr Bernice Eddy (3) became very concerned
after vaccinating 18 monkeys with the inactivated polio vaccine. She
discovered that the vaccine was causing the monkeys to become paralyzed.
She wrote:


“We had eighteen monkeys. We
inoculated these eighteen monkeys with each vaccine that came in. And
we started getting paralyzed monkeys.”


Alarmed, she immediately informed her superiors sending photos
of the monkeys. Instead of the thanks she had expected, and the
immediate halt of the vaccine programme, a surprising thing happened.
William Sebrell, the director of the NIH, stopped by the animal house
where they were working, not to thank her for blowing the whistle but to ask if she and her co-workers wanted their children immunized with the vaccine, as it was in short supply. Needless to say neither she nor her researchers thought the vaccine was worth the risk.


Shortly after Eddy’s discovery, a study written by Peterson et al
appeared in the JAMA magazine. (4) Peterson also spoke about
vaccination induced poliomyelitis, this time in Idaho during the trial
of the Salk (injectable) vaccine. This study was included as part of
Dr Scheibner’s research in her letter in the BMJ.
To Hide The Vaccines Inadequacies Polio Develops A New Name

Many
professionals believe that in order to keep up the pretence that
diseases have been eradicated they are simply being renamed to cover up
the fact that the vaccines are failing. According to the site
whaleto.com (5) Greg Beatie wrote:


Health officials convinced the Chinese to rename the bulk of their polio cases Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS). A study found that the new disorder (Chinese Paralytic Syndrome) and the GBS was really polio.
After mass vaccination in 1971, reports of polio went down but GBS
increased about 10 fold…….In the WHO polio vaccine eradication in the
Americas, there were 930 cases of paralytic disease—all called polio.
Five years later, at the end of the campaign, roughly 2000 cases of
paralytic disease occurred—but only 6 of them were called polio. The
rate of paralytic disease doubled, but the disease definition changed so
drastically that hardly any of it was called polio any more.”

It appears that the Chinese may not have been the only country to
adopt this philosophy. Anla et al reported children being diagnosed
with GBS immediately after polio vaccinations in Turkey. In an article
published in Neurology India. (6) Anla reported that five children
became ill with GBS following a national oral polio vaccination campaign
to eradicate the disease in Turkey. He wrote:


It was observed that the number of
cases of GBS in children increased during the period of the oral polio
vaccination (OPV) campaign in Turkey, suggesting a causal
relationship.

In their discussion they wrote:


In our series all children were
younger than 5 years of age. GBS was primarily related to OPV
administration in all children except Case 4 in whom a history of viral
gastroenteritis was present, which was well known as a triggering
factor in the etiology of GBS.[13] When OPV was not given
during 1999 we diagnosed only 2 children with GBS who were younger
than 5 years of age in our clinic. Though the results are variable and
the evidence is not robust, it is essential to consider OPV as a
potential trigger for GBS in children, especially during a nationwide
campaign and the children should be monitored.


It was observed that the
number of cases of GBS in children increased during the period of the
oral polio vaccination (OPV) campaign in Turkey, suggesting a causal
relationship.

Could these children actually be suffering from vaccine induced
poliomyelitis, simply renamed GBS, to cover up the fact that the
vaccine had caused the children to contract the disease rather than
protect them from it?It certainly is a strong possibility.
Amazingly, Guillain Barre Syndrome is not the only new name given to
patients developing polio after receiving the polio vaccine. Beddow
Bayly author of the book “The Case against Vaccination,” (7) wrote:


After vaccination was introduced,
cases of aseptic meningitis were more often reported as a separate
disease from polio, but such cases were counted as polio before the
vaccine was introduced. The Ministry of Health admitted that the
vaccine status of the individual is a guiding factor in diagnosis. If a
person who is vaccinated contracts the disease, the disease is simply
recorded under a different name.

This leads us to ask the question – is polio the only disease
that has had a sudden name change? Sadly the answer to this question
is a resounding “NO!”; this is because other diseases have also been
reported to have had a sudden name change.
Smallpox Gets A New Lease Of Life

It has long been
suggested that smallpox still exists and has simply been renamed to
carry on the hoax that vaccination has saved us from the mighty jaws
of the smallpox epidemics. In an article titled ‘Smallpox: a New Threat’ Susan Claridge ( wrote:


A popular tactic among the
supporters of vaccination is renaming of a disease when it occurs in
the vaccinated so that the statistics do not reflect the true numbers
of vaccinated people contracting the disease, thus concealing the fact
that the vaccine does not work.


George Bernard Shaw was a
member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council at the turn
of the century: “I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up
statistically by diagnosing all the revaccinated cases (of smallpox) as
pustular eczema, varioloid or what not – anything except smallpox.

Susan Claridge does not stand alone in her beliefs; Dr R Obomsawin (9) joins her, writing:


In turning to recognized textbooks
on human virology and vertebrate viruses we find that attention has
been given since 1970 to a disease called “monkeypox,” which is said
to be “clinically indistinguishable from smallpox.” Cases of this
disease have been found in Zaire, Cameroon, Nigeria, Ivory Coast,
Liberia, and Sierra Leone (by May 1983, 101 cases have been reported).
It is observed that ” . . . the existence of a virus that can cause
clinical smallpox is disturbing, and the situation is being closely
monitored.

Does the deceit stop here? No of course not, the next disease to get a name change is whooping cough.
Whooping Cough Gets A Revamp

Whooping cough has also
been found to have a name change. It has been reported over and over
that cases of whooping cough have been diagnosed in fully vaccinated
children. In fact one report stated that vaccine failure has actually
been admitted. Natural News (10) reported:



New research reported by Reuters reveals that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children
compared with unvaccinated children. This is based on a study led by
Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the Kaiser
Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California.

Doctors have known this for a very long time and there could be
many more cases than we could ever imagine. Professionals have
discovered that doctors have been diagnosing whooping cough as croup!.
Dr Viera Scheibner says:


In the Journal of Infectious
Diseases, 1994, “Age Specific Incidence of Bacteriologically Confirmed
Pertussis, between 1981 and 1991 – ten year follow-up”.(11) The
majority of cases occurred in the most vulnerable age group below the
age of one year in the most vaccinated children. Actually the majority
of cases happened within the first four months. The vaccine is
causing whooping cough. A lot of children develop whooping cough from
the vaccine, but if they are vaccinated, it will be diagnosed as
‘croup’.

Bronwyn Hancock Vaccine Information Service agrees (12) stating:


“(2) The diagnostic guidelines
given to doctors were supplemented with “No history of vaccination”
when the vaccines were introduced. Even without these written
guidelines, doctors are taught that vaccines are effective. The result
is that upon seeing an illness in a child who has been vaccinated
“against” it, doctors have been observed to conclude that the disease
must be a different disease, so the case of the disease is not
reported.


For example whooping cough
gets called “croup” when it occurs in vaccinated children, and
diphtheria gets called such names as “epiglotitis”, or, as in this
case, described in “Raising a Vaccine Free Child”, by Wendy Lydall
(2005, pg 68),
‘Her aunt
had nursed diphtheria cases in Britain in the 1950s, and she said that
her niece had the typical symptoms of diphtheria. The girl was flown
by helicopter to a bigger hospital in Auckland, where they took a swab
from her throat and confirmed diphtheria. When they learned that the
girl was fully immunised, one of the doctors said to the mother, “Then
it can’t be diphtheria.” They changed the diagnosis to bacterial
tracheitis.’


So the teaching of doctors
that vaccination will reduce number of cases *reported* of a disease
is a self-fulfilling prophecy, regardless of how many cases there are
in reality.”

The bottom line is parents are being duped into believing that
vaccinations will protect children from deadly diseases when in fact
they protect children from absolutely nothing. The truth is that more
and more vaccinated children are becoming sick with the diseases that
they have been vaccinated against and research is revealing that doctors
are devising clever ways to cover this up. Not only this but the
adverse reactions that children can have from the vaccines, are
potentially worse than the diseases themselves. It seems to me that
vaccinations are little more than a get rich quick scheme run by the
pharmaceutical industries and endorsed by the governments. This is not
only criminal it is fraud by any other name.



Source:-
http://vactruth.com/2012/04/25/change-names-of-diseases/