World-Wide Contamination From Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering

Could a Ban of Transparent Reporting at the Asilomar Conference be
an Attempt to Cover-Up World-Wide Contamination From Stratospheric
Aerosol Geo-Engineering Programs?

Geo-engineers gathered once again near Monterey California at the
Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies
meeting to develop norms and guidelines for what they say will be
“controlled experimentation” on geo-engineering the planet. While many
claim that stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (SAG), aka chemtrail
programs are in full-scale deployment, organizers of this meeting
showed a lack of transparency by either denying or holding reporters
to a high set of rules which limited what information was brought to
the attention of the public. While we might never know how much
information from the conference was suppressed in articles and reports,
we do know some of the information that was not included. The issue
of current SAG deployment and the use of aluminum in these programs
seemed to be missing from reports and articles that came out of the
conference.

	People from around the world are witnessing white trails behind airplanes and believe them to be a product of SAG programs that scientists deny exist.

Mauro Oliveira, webmaster of GeoEngineeringWatch
said that aluminum became a concern to many after the American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting when
independent journalists sent shockwaves around the world after breaking
the story of scientists discussing the plausibility of spraying 10 to
20 mega-tons of aluminum into the sky in SAG campaigns. Francis
Mangels, a retired USDA/USFS Biologist commented on the use of aluminum
by saying, “although aluminum is an abundant element, it does not
exist naturally in the environment in free form. Dispersing massive
amounts of ultra-fine aluminum particulates as proposed by
geo-engineers into the stratosphere would have unquantifiable human
health and environmental impacts”. When scientists were asked about
the risks associated with the use of aluminum sprayed as an aerosol in
SAG programs, they admitted that they have only begun to research
aluminum and have published nothing. They also admitted that something
terrible could be found in the future that they don’t know about.
Also, when asked about deployment of current programs, scientists
denied that any SAG programs have been deployed. This contradicted the
findings of many who claim that SAG programs are well under-way and
that high amounts of aluminum and other harmful substances from these
programs are being found resulting in the devastation of eco-systems
and the health of people around the world.


Like the AAAS meeting, the Asilomar geo-engineering conference hosted
some of the world’s leading geo-engineers, environmental groups and
scientists who gathered to discuss various issues relating to SAG.
Unlike the AAAS meeting, reporters were either denied attendance or
set to a high standard of rules which included a ban on daily
reporting, quoting, and recording anything from the meeting without the
consent of presenters. Stewart Howe was one of the reporters denied
access into the conference. Howe helped break the story about
aluminum when he was sent to the AAAS meeting in San Diego to report
for Infowars. He feels that he was denied access because of this and
his reporting of evidence that suggests SAG programs are in full-scale
deployment. Howe said, “due to the devastating effects of aluminum
and world-wide claims of current deployment, transparent reporting of
this could devastate the entire SAG agenda compromising billions of
dollars in contracts.” He went on to say that it was apparent that
this meeting had no intentions of being transparent.

Whereas many reporters were denied access to this event, some
“privileged” journalists did have the opportunity to attend. Although
some of the articles about the conference appeared to be critical of
geo-engineering, they largely ignored the use of aluminum and other
serious issues that could have impacted or changed the damaging
components of the SAG agenda. Due to their agreement to the strict,
non-transparent guidelines of the conference, the reporting journalists
not only helped keep some of the meeting secret, they also helped
hide the fact that geo-engineers are “planning” to use aluminum in SAG
programs. Some articles were also falsely written stating that
geo-engineers are planning on using sulfur in the various SAG
campaigns. This contradicts articles written by some reporters who
attended the AAAS meeting and quoted scientists as stating that they
initially considered using sulfur for the program; however, aluminum is
more effective and will be the ingredient considered for use. To
date, scientists have not corrected the journalists who falsely
reported the use of less damaging sulfur instead of harmful aluminum as
being an ingredient for SAG programs.

Let’s look at this issue a little more closely. People from around
the world are witnessing white trails behind airplanes and believe them
to be a product of SAG programs that scientists deny exist. People
are also reporting test results of high amounts of aluminum, barium and
strontium in their snow, rain and soil where the alleged spraying is
occurring. These are the exact substances that scientists are
“considering” implementing into the various SAG programs discussed at
the AAAS meeting. Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the AAAS
meeting because of reports that led many to believe that the
destruction of eco-systems and the massive amounts of aluminum found in
the snow, rain and soil are in fact from SAG programs that have
already been deployed. As a result of these reports, many around the
world are asking questions about the current deployment and the dangers
of using aluminum in these programs. And finally, journalists are
restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could
be damaging to the SAG agenda.

Could transparent reporting of certain facts threaten the current and
future deployment of SAG programs around the world? Could denying
independent reporters the freedom to openly report on this meeting be
an attempt to cover-up allegations that SAG programs are in full-scale
deployment and are also destroying eco-systems around the world with
the use of aluminum? Is it possible that the reporters who were
allowed into this meeting were invited for the purpose of protecting
the corporate and political interests of those involved with SAG
programs? What would the political and monetary implications be for
those who have vested interests in SAG if the larger public was made
aware of the multiple environmental and health effects of spraying
mega-tons of aluminum into our environment? Whatever the reason for
this lack of transparency and denial of information, we the public need
to hold both reporters and scientists to a higher degree of
professionalism, transparency and ethical consideration when it comes
to these and other issues of public interests. The future of our
health and environment is dependent upon it.


Source:-
http://www.infowars.com/shhh-what-if-it-was-reported-that-they-are-spraying-aluminum/