Posts : 8038
Join date : 2012-05-29
Location : Manchester UK
|Subject: Confirmed Health Harms from Microwaves In Smart Meters And Other Smart Devices Mon 13 Nov 2017, 13:49|| |
Confirmed Health Harms from Microwaves In Smart Meters And Other Smart Devices
November 10, 2017
By Catherine J. Frompovich
Have you ever wondered what the real deal
is regarding RF EMFs from cell phones, Wi-Fi, all smart devices, but specifically from AMI Smart Meters being forced upon everyone’s utilities
? Well, here’s documentation of the facts as presented to the Michigan House of Representatives on December 7, 2014 by Thermal Radiation Consultant (35 years) Curtis Bennett, which I was not able to copy and paste from his secured pdf file, but am invoking Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act 1976, which states allowance is made for “Fair Use” for purposes of reporting, teaching and research among other uses. This information was published online and is accessible in full by accessing http://thermoguy.com/wp-content/uploads/Michigan-House-of-Representatives-Smart-Meters.pdf
Personally, I cannot thank Mr. Curtis Bennett enough for his scientific knowledge, integrity and willingness to present accurate science to the State of Michigan state’s legislators, who apparently turned a collective deaf ear and blind eye to the science.
Mr. Bennett stated,
- Quote :
- It was alarming to read in Safety Code 6  that causation linking the RF EMFs to adverse health effects were missing and that code would be adapted when peer review science was reported sustaining harm.
According to Curtis Bennett, Chief Science Officer and Adjunct Professor for Integrative Health Forum & Global Education Development Institute (among other qualifications),
- Quote :
- As a result of missing science, Health Canada, the FCC and other governing bodies have adopted the Specific Absorption Rate for the limits of human exposure. [The] Sam Phantom Model [photograph provided in pdf file] [is] used for testing the science DTE is using to support safety.
All cellphone manufacturers have to submit their phones for testing. [….]
The same test is adapted for Wi-Fi and Smart Meters except 24/7 exposure has been deemed safe because the laptop and meter are not held against the head like a cell phone.
Now here is the dangerous part about consensus science
and its omissions of accuracy in scientific testing:
It would seem to anyone with a science background the above validation by Health Canada factually confirms the pitfalls, shortcomings and dangers inherent with consensus science! So why is consensus science propelling corporate interests in the microwave, pharmaceutical, vaccine and other vested-interests, especially at the World Health Organization and federal agencies which should know better and act accordingly?
- Quote :
- Health Canada’s radiation professionals confirmed that cell phone antennas, Wi-Fi Routers or wireless smart grid were not considered in the SAR test. Neither was any bio/electrical/chemical Information associated with a human. The SAR only considered the end use device on a wireless electrical circuit.
Adjunct Professor Bennett goes on to say,
- Quote :
- There are real reasons we wire the world. Wired circuits are insulated known conductors and wireless circuits require great consideration because there is no insulation and everything hit by these RF EMFs will be inside the wireless circuit.
It’s under Bennett’s remarks about “Health Effects”
we read the most dramatic features associated with RF absorption and Smart Meter frequencies
What does that tell you about Smart Meters RF EMFs from microwaves?
- Quote :
- Electro Hypersensitive people isn’t the correct terminology. As per the utility coverage area above several cities [in Michigan] will be blanketed with RF EMFs for smart meters and everyone without exception is within the EMF. Page 7, second paragraph of Safety Code 6  states “The rate and distribution of RF energy absorption depends strongly on the frequency, intensity and orientation of the incident fields as the body size and its constitutive properties (dielectric constant and conductivity).” Just the orientation to the field can make a difference but people aren’t just sensitive, they are subtly being electrocuted. Smart Meter frequencies hitting people from head to toe at all different angles requires impossible calculations by engineers because every movement within the EMF changes the orientation to the EMFs. [CJF emphasis]
How does that sit with you knowing you are being subtly electrocuted
? Are all those smart gadgets, cell phones, etc. consumers have become addicted to
, plus utility-and-PUC-forced AMI Smart Meters, really worth all the invisible health costs consumers unwillingly are subjected to,
which are based upon skewed, non-existent, non-reported PEER REVIEW consensus ‘science’?
Professor Bennett goes on to explain what happens to EMFs inside the body, which ought to impress anyone with any sense of self-preservation as “what the heck am I allowing to happen to me and my kids”.
What’s with 5G faster Wi-Fi
- Quote :
- These EMFs will expand and collapse inside the body billions of times per measurable second, 3600 times per hour, 86,400 times every 24 hours and 2,592,000 times per month. The peer reviewed science is called electricity.
Smart Meters contain a second RF EMF antenna for Wi-Fi energy devices inside the building. The number of devices is unknown as well as their orientation to a pacemaker, baby, pregnant mom, elderly. The RF EMFs associated with Wi-Fi at 2.4 GHz will expand and collapse inside bodies, walls, roofs 4.8 billion times per second. That induces currents as well as the high speed polarization 180 degrees 4.8 billion times per second will rip anything apart and the peer review science is called electricity. SAR admits inducing currents into people and are changing cellular voltages.
Pacemaker recipients are told to stay out of an electromagnetic field, smart meter programs will take the EMF to the vulnerable patient’s home. http://thermoguy.com/emf-pacemaker
If the above harms come from 2.4 GHz range for 3G and 4G Wi-Fi, how much magnification and greater intensities will assault humans, wildlife, birds, bees and all life forms, including food crops, trees, plants, etc., when the coveted-and-yet-untested, unproven-non-existent-long-term safety tests for 5G millimeter radiation waves Wi-Fi
are shoved down the U.S. FCC’s regulatory throat and the IARC’s at the World Health Organization by microwave industry associations?As Mr. Bennett was concluding his presentation, he said:
- Quote :
- The Specific Absorption Rate is an admission of harm and isn’t applicable science. RF EMF deployment with flawed science is incredibly dangerous, it changes the scope of every science except science doesn’t know it is happening yet.