Vaccine inventor Paul Offit seeks end to religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions

In Vaccines We Trust? Vaccine inventor Paul Offit seeks end to religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions







Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Contributor
Activist Post

Millionaire vaccine inventor and mandatory vaccine advocate Paul Offit recently released a short VIDEO for doctors on medscape. Here is a transcript of the speech.
This statement that outlines Offit’s personal belief system could be a
prelude to the legal removal of all philosophical and religious vaccine
exemptions in the United States of America. This is something that Offit
has been working toward for years, and the likely end-purpose of his
series of books.

Paul Offit believes that exempting your child from vaccination is
morally reprehensible. He considers himself an authority on autism, all
infectious diseases, morality, history, every religious systems, and
infant immunology. You may also recognize Dr Offit as the one who says
that all vaccines are perfectly safe and infants can tolerate
theoretically 10,000 of them at once:


<blockquote class="tr_bq">
A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response
would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could
respond at one time…. each infant would have the theoretical capacity to
respond to about 10, 000 vaccines at any one time. [1]</blockquote>
The status accorded to him by the pharmaceutical and medical fields
permits him to influence the opinions and practice of lower rung
physicians regarding vaccine exemptions. Unfortunately, even doctors
will simply believe the “expert”[2] without bothering to go and check
their own medical literature to see if the self-proclaimed expertise has
a solid scientific foundation. Research shows that when people listen
to the expert, the part of their brains that is capable of independent
thought goes to sleep.[3]

In Offit’s video, he said that religious exemptions
do not “make sense” and went on to inform doctors on the chronological
age of three religious scriptures, and how they could not possibly have
anything to do with vaccination because vaccines are so much newer than
those tattered and outmoded scribbles of hundreds or thousands of years
ago. Those “outmoded” books, including the Old Testament and the Koran,
include specific passages containing principles which obliquely address
many health issues. To many people, these scriptures place vaccines
amongst may things which are not consistent with scriptural hygiene.
Here are specific references from the HOLY BIBLE and the KORAN. Dr Katme’s explanation of the Islamic problems with vaccination can be read HERE.
Hindu faith also has restrictions on what is permitted in their bodies,
the treatment of cows and monkeys, etc. Vaccination is an affront to
many Hindus who know the contents of vaccines.





God gave Moses core principles on Mt. Sinai that are held in high esteem
by both Christians and Jews the world over. Offit misses out on the
timelessness of God’s words. God’s principles don’t wear out. Neither do
they need continuous repeating and revising.

God could have instructed Moses on how to inoculate the Israelites in
the desert when the diseases came upon them. If you take note of the Old
Testament books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, you’ll
see that there were very specific guidelines handed down on everything
from worship of God to disease management, with warnings as to what
would happen if those guidelines were ignored. The Israelites had highly
skilled metal smiths and very sophisticated craftsmen and oil
production. They had access to all the tools that Edward Jenner used to
invent the smallpox vaccine, which included cowpox (not smallpox) pus
scraped directly from infected cow bellies, a crude filter, glycerine,
and a sharp prong. Paul Offit may not realize how crude the highly
praised first vaccine really was. Still, medical vaccination or
inoculation of any sort, was never part of God’s instruction.

Hospital-based doctors who consider any disease that is supposedly
treatable by pharmaceutical medicine to have a spiritual component, are
considered to be quacks. Lip service, however, is given through the
tolerance of chaplains and religious representatives, so long as they
don’t interfere with the use of drugs, vaccines or “medical science.”

In the New Testament, did Jesus, the greatest human healer of all time,
ever turn to Luke, the physician-apostle, to do any of the healing work
of people brought to him? No. Did any of the apostles and disciples ever
call on Luke to do God’s healing for them? No. Did Jesus instruct Luke
to carry on with his old medical practices later? No. Jesus left the
Holy Spirit here on earth for any and all to ask for, receive and gain
wisdom from.

In
medical school, doctors are taught to view the human body as a random
mistake-ridden vessel, which is to be forced into submission with
antibiotics, antihypertensives, antihistamines, anti-inflammatories,
surgery, drugs etc. The natural extension of this paradigm over the past
100 years has been for the medical profession to condition human beings
to not trust anyone but certified medical doctors to fix this defective
mistake-ridden aberration of creation. Veterinary science has similarly
conditioned humans to consider animals as defective, mistake-ridden
creation prototypes. The number one successful strategy in creating this
industry has been to always implant fear into people’s heads. That
increases cortisol, undermines the immune system, and creates a
self-fulfilling prophecy.

Vaccines are the template for the fear-based belief system that those
who don’t know their history will easily fall for. The trajectory of
fear removes God from the picture. A fear-ridden populace couldn’t
possibly credit God with any usefulness once the medical/pharmaceutical
industry sets itself up in God’s place.

Through the resultant lack of faith in the human creation and the God
who does actually have the power to heal all through both the design of
the body and miracles, seeps the arrogance (and ignorance) of doctors
and scientists who think they can outwit God’s nature. While sometimes
it might look like it’s possible to outwit nature, for example by using
antibiotics, the law of “What you sow you will reap” often comes back
with a vengeance. Drug-resistant bacteria like MRSA, VRE, and overgrowth
of the colitis-causing Clostridium difficile, are prime examples.

Doctors like Paul Offit believe that the slowly maturing immune system
of an infant is defective[4] and that vaccinations[5][6], designed to
put it into hyper-drive, will fix the defects. On the other hand, Dr
Offit doesn’t have much faith in his own laboratory creations, since he
believes that the anti-vaccination movement “threatens us all,”
including presumably … the vaccinated.

Paul Offit makes reference to the two states that have ruled that
parents do not have a religious privilege to decide how their children’s
bodies are treated, citing US Constitutional amendment 14. The 14th
amendment was designed to protect newly freed slaves. It is being used
for a different purpose in Mississippi and West Virginia. Many people
are unaware that the 14th amendment is the most controversial amendment
ever proposed, and that according to some legal experts, it was NEVER LEGALLY RATIFIED. See also this PDF.

I would like to refer Paul Offit to Public Law 97-280 96 STAT.1211 (97th
Congress) which is a law that Declares the Bible to Be The Word of God.
This represents Congress’ stance that the Bible has its rightful place
above the Constitution because our forefathers were inspired by the
Bible in the writing of the Constitution. Every four years the president
of the USA is sworn into office with his hand on a Bible. Offit would
probably just consider this a silly tradition. However, most presidents
have publicly recognized the role of God and religious faith in the public life and spiritual heritage of America.

If
corporate medicine is going to be permitted to over-ride parental
philosophical and religious objections, and invade the bodies of our
children with dozens of vaccine antigens, chemicals, animal DNA, aborted
fetal tissue, and CANCER CELLS, the source of these laws must come under scrutiny.

The impingement on Article I of the FIRST AMENDMENT
of the Constitution should also be taken into consideration.“Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

It would appear that the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation has made PLANS that would steamroll right over the protection of our free speech.

<blockquote class="tr_bq">
An anti-vaccine surveillance and alert system Seth Kalichman of the http://www.uconn.edu/
in the USA will establish an Internet-based global monitoring and rapid
alert system for finding, analysing, and counteracting communication
campaigns containing misinformation regarding vaccines to support global
immunization efforts.</blockquote>
Only time will tell what is going to be considered “misinformation” and
“counteraction.” If parents were convinced that vaccines are safe and
effective, there would be no anti-vaccination movement. It shouldn’t
take military action or Internet surveillance to maintain the health of
communities or global immunization efforts. This type of action is not
new. It is reminiscent of policies found in National Socialist empires,
Stalinist countries, or Communist China.

Those who push removal of philosophical and religious exemption should at least be free of financial CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, and they are NOT.
More importantly, in order to bolster the
30-billion-dollar-per-year-income vaccine industry they consider to be
evidence-based science, they should not be proclaiming worldwide
expertise in what it takes to have a personal relationship with Jesus,
something they appear to have no experience in.

Dr Offit considers “evidence based medicine” to be separate from
religion, or spirituality – yet the Christian scriptures, both old
testament and new, make it perfectly clear that good health is solely
predicated on a living relationship with God.

When it comes to vaccines, these flag bearers of evidence-based medicine
use research protocols which involve tight selection and exclusion
criteria for vaccine study entrants. They then recommend those same
vaccines, assuring safety to concerned parents, to even the children who
would have been refused entry to that vaccine safety study.

Instead of placebos, evidence based medicines uses vaccines, and calls
them placebos, yet vaccines do not fit their own definition of
placebo;pla·ce·bo/pləˈsēbō/Noun:

1. A harmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the
   psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect.
   
2. A substance that has no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing new drugs.
   

Here are some examples of vaccine trial “placebos”:

The hepatitis A vaccine was the placebo for the influenza vaccine in a well publicized STUDY. The study’s designer is quoted as SAYING
that he didn’t want to withhold a potentially beneficial treatment from
the control subjects. “Hepatitis was not studied, but to keep the
investigators from knowing which colonies received flu vaccine, they had
to offer placebo shots, and hepatitis shots do some good while sterile
water injections do not.“ So, if the placebo is supposed to have no
therapeutic effect as the definition that was taken from an ardently
pro-vaccine website that criticizes our criticism of their use of
placebos, and the study used hepA placebo because “water does no good” …
where on earth is the match up with even their definition of science?

You can go HERE and see for yourself how many dangerous false placebo trials are done. THIS
is an interesting one where the placebo for evaluating the safety of
albumin-containing vaccines in egg-allergic children is … an
egg-containing vaccine.

Multi
antigen vaccines used in trials, as placebos for other multi antigen
vaccines happens all of the time. These studies would be the ones Offit
refers to, regarding the safety of giving numerous vaccines on the same
day.

Not using real placebos, like saline, is a trade sleight of hand,
because harmful placebos will give results which show that the study
vaccine appears to have the same safety profile as the placebo - and is
therefore seemingly OK.

The truth is, that corporate medicine makes the rules up to suit its own
needs. When children die and parents successfully sue the vaccine
companies responsible for the deaths, first congressmen (who accept
massive corporate medicine campaign funding) then the Supreme Court,
jump in to protect vaccine interests. It is politics and money, which
rule on vaccine recommendations. I’ve only cited a couple examples of
the hypocrisy of the vaccine faithful. There are hundreds if not
thousands more examples of both scientific hypocrisy and CORRUPTION.

Paul Offit challenges the issue of philosophical exemption using the word origins. He says:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Philo means love, sophos means wisdom. Exactly where is the wisdom in
saying that it is better not to get vaccines than to get them?</blockquote>
For many educated parents, scientists and parents of vaccine-injured
children who have given birth to subsequently unvaccinated children, who
have the kind of health that God intended (and pediatricians appear to
not understand), there is plenty of wisdom and indeed love, in not
vaccinating.

Many of us who once bowed at the altar of “eminence-based” medicine,
have learned the hard way, and had to reboot our belief system. We have
learned through experience and researching the latest core scientific
understanding of the immune system, that the human body can and does do
the job God intended. By going back to the scriptures and understanding
the principles from the “manufacturer’s manual,” we have a newfound awe
and respect for God’s design. We are learning that we can trust God’s
design to maintain its health, providing we follow God’s principles to
support and maintain what he manufactured, which is what it means to
have a relationship with God, and to believe in God’s word.

And I ask you Paul Offit, where is the wisdom in injecting newborn
infants with neurotoxins, carcinogens, foreign animal and viral DNA, and
metals that are known to alter the natural course of God’s exquisitely
designed immunity? To many who believe in God, vaccines are anything but
divine. Fear of disease and faith in vaccination, along with the
alteration of the human organism with new bacteria, new vaccine viruses
and chronic illness are not part of God’s curriculum.

In the developed world today, we see risk-averse parenting, and cocooned
children, both of whom have become disconnected from the earth, largely
as a result of corporate medicine. Yet when this same medical system
fails with its drugs, etc, they turn back to such things as MAGGOT THERAPY, and in desperation, try FECAL TRANSPLANTATION. See THIS ARTICLE TOO.
Both of these treatments are, in an ironic sort of way, God’s
contributions. Isn’t that interesting? These are things that any nation
in existence in the Old Testament times, could have done…,

The problem with man trying to assume the role of God is that every new
discovery shows scientists more of what they DON’T know. Occasionally
the medical system discovers a mistake they have made and then they have
to change course and discontinue some long-held practice because it
caused cancer, heart disease, fetal malformations, or loss of life. But
rarely is the public told about that. Where possible, such knowledge is
kept “in house.”

We have to ask ourselves why the most heavily funded research is towards
chemically or biologically altering an immune system about which the MEDICAL SYSTEM KNOWS LITTLE.

Where are the studies that show the short- and long-term safety in
vaccinating a woman who bears a new life in her womb? The vaccine
product description states that they have not been tested for
mutagenicity or teratogenicity. Certainly they will never be tested for
long-term consequences on the developing child. Do the lessons of DIETHYLSTILBESTROL
(DES) not apply to vaccines? The eminence based medical system will no
doubt perform vaccine studies only asking carefully crafted
pre-determined questions with an eye to what they want to see. The data
generated by the statisticians of pharmaceutically funded studies, with
cunningly chosen placebos, will no doubt find no toxicity in vaccinating
pregnant women, whatsoever.

Where
are the long-term studies on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated and the status
of their health? “It can’t be done,” say Offit, et al. Most
importantly, where is the interest in successful treatment of the
infectious diseases? After all, one of the most potent marketing phrases
behind so many of these vaccines is “because there is no cure.” Perhaps
the word “cure” is banned on the potential research list.

As medical students, we learned the biochemical process of oxidative
metabolism and the function of the amazing mitochondria. How many
practicing doctors really appreciate the design of those biochemical and
electrical pathways that are essential to properly functioning and
robust health? How many doctors know how to put that knowledge into
practice? Why doesn’t medical education support nutritional programs
that are geared toward this primary process of oxygen utilization into
energy and inflammation reduction? There is nothing more important to
the sustenance and vibrance of health. Just try holding your breath for
three minutes and you will see how true that is. There is nothing more
important than the body’s use of oxygen, which extends far beyond the
lungs and ultimately involves the mitochondria. Where are the studies
looking into how vaccines alter the process of oxidative metabolism, the
ratio of NAD/NADH? I shudder to think what the results would show.
Where are the studies looking at whether vaccines have an adverse
epigenetic effect on the development and function of the immune system?
To me these intricate and elaborate processes are sacred and designed by
a power far greater than Paul Offit or any scientist. Yet most of them
act is if it would be possible for them to develop a far better human
with a much better immune system than the ones they are studying.

Those of us who do not vaccinate our children have learned from each
other how to support our children through the usual childhood illnesses,
because we can’t rely on conventional medicine’s approach. It is just
too limited in principles, vision and solutions.

In the timeline of humanity, vaccines are a modern invention but they
have absolutely NO claim to the betterment of humanity. There are
distinct and known factors that had a far bigger impact on diseases and
mortality than vaccines, and they were implemented long before the
vaccines were in full use. See AIELLO, NELSON, and MCKINLEY. See also "THE AMAZING DECLINE."
Until the proper study is conducted to compare the health of vaccinated
vs unvaccinated children, nobody has the authority to uphold
vaccination as superior to holistic management.

Paul Offit claims to be an unbiased scientist with no personal interest
in vaccination. To me, this does not make sense. In 2008 while sitting
on the ACIP as a voting member, Children’s Hospital Of Pennsylvania sold
its royalty stake in Offit’s vaccine RotaTeq for $182 million, and
Offit received an unspecified percentage: his share of the intellectual
property, said to be “in the millions.” Why doesn’t he just call himself
what he really is? A “multimillionaire vaccine patent owner who, by INFLUENCING IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES
while sitting on the Advisory Committee For Immunization Practices, had
a huge personal interest in policymaking, and wants to remove your
personal rights as to what goes into your infant and your body by way of
injection, and touts his own personal feelings on religion and wisdom
to naïve doctors over the internet.”

According to a 2009 Philadelphia Magazine interview
with Offit, a reporter asked him once if he was the Antichrist, and he
replied, “I’m just one of the Devil’s many humble servants.”


Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/in-vaccines-we-trust-vaccine-inventor.html