Eugenicists Use DNA and Genetic Research to Push Depopulation Agenda

Eugenicists Use DNA and Genetic Research to Push Depopulation Agenda







Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

DeCODE Genetics (DCG) has published a study that
states Icelandic fathers who are in their 40s pass down more genetic
mutations than their 20 year-old counterparts. According the DCG, 97% of
genetic mutations are derived from older fathers.

Because males produce sperm throughout their lives, and the genetic
make-up of that sperm is created from mutations based on previously
produced sperm. This study supposes that increase in autism could be
connected to these genetic mutations.

This has led to an increase in genetic defects, suggests lead researcher Dr. Kari Stefansson. She asserts:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Society has been very focused on the age of the mother. But apart from
[Down's Syndrome] it seems that disorders such as schizophrenia and
autism are influenced by the age of the father and not the mother.</blockquote>
Studies into DNA with regard to reproduction and children harken back to
proponents of eugenics that discouraged the procreation of those deemed
“unfit” by the upper Elite of society.

The President’s Council on Bioethics, who supports the screening of newborn blood in America, has stated that:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Advocates of a broadened notion of ‘benefit’ often extol the utility of
newborn screening for helping parents make future reproductive
decisions…But this notion of ‘benefit to the family’ is not
unproblematic…Suppose that expanded screening of an infant reveals not a
fatal and incurable disease but instead a host of genetic variants,
each of which merely confers elevated risk for some condition or other.
Who is to say at what point an uncovered defect becomes serious enough
to warrant preventing the birth of other children who might carry it? At
what point have we crossed the line from legitimate family planning to
capricious and morally dubious eugenics?</blockquote>



The US government, in conjunction with hospital participation, has been
warehousing newborn DNA with the intention to conduct full genome scans
on every American citizen.

In June of this year, researchers at the University of Washington announced
that they had successfully sequenced the genome of a fetus through a
blood sample of the mother and a saliva sample of the father.

The fascination of population control purveyed by eugenicists like
Margaret Sanger, founder of the Planned Parenthood in the US also wanted
to further the advancement of genetic knowledge to prevent the unfit
from breeding. Those of African-American decent, who were born with
mental or physical handicaps, or had a family history that was not
favored by the eugenicists, were forced to undergo sterilization through
the mandate of Eugenics Courts – that now have morphed into the Family
Court system in our modern times.

This philosophy, which was popular in the 1920s where racial hygiene was
expected throughout society, has gone underground and transformed into
scientific advancements into genetics. This science has touted that once
a screen for genetic defects is created for fetuses, it can eliminate
the need for unnecessary pregnancies.

Keeping abortion legal is integral to this ideology; while coercing the
public into choosing abortion over other options is the job of Planned
Parenthood. In this way, the standards set forth by early eugenicists
lives on.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) withdrew funding for a conference
on genetic factors in crime after protests from the Association of
Black Psychologists protested the research as “a blatant form of
stereotyping and racism.”

The use of research into the human genome and criminal behavior to
explain how societal conditions contributed to certain racial
propensities became an offence with regard to devising new ways to
determine how genes might heighten the risk of crime in American
society.

Professor Ahmed Hariri of the Duke Neurogenetics Department at Duke University led a study into
the search for the human personality gene in order to explain “natural”
propensities toward anxiety, alcoholism and other psychological traits.

The goal of these studies is to create a comprehensive genetic test for
the mind. This test could help show how effective drugs like Prozac will
affect an individual’s propensity toward mental disorders like
depression.

In anticipation of Hariri’s findings, pharmaceutical corporations are
testing drugs that will block and break an individual’s addictive
propensities as an aid to already established psychological treatments.

By identifying genetic markers within DNA, scientists pushed theories into how “crime and violence weave social and biological themes together.”

By pointing out the genes that control aggressive or violent impulses,
scientists and criminologists claim that the influence of environment
can be added to the devising of genetic testing that can be tailored
toward rehabilitation of certain stereotypes.

At the Euroscience Open Forum 2012 in Dublin, Armand Leroi, professor at
the Imperial College London told the audience that genetics will lead
to the production of healthier babies. Couples could use the IVF screen
to rule out genetic defects that would prevent them from having
physically strong children.

Leroi stated that with the eugenic discoveries in modern times, babies
who would have been born with Down Syndrome are now being aborted “in
most European countries.”

With the addition of mate or genetic selection, more children who would
be born who have genetic defects are being weeded out in utero.

Source:-

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/eugenicists-use-dna-and-genetic.html