Roman Catholic Church continues to support Bishop convicted of covering up for pedophile priest
|
Bishop Robert Finn |
Madison Ruppert,
ContributorActivist PostBishop Robert Finn of the Diocese of Kansas City, who was found guilty
of failing to report suspected sexual abuse of a child to authorities,
is now refusing to resign, and the Roman Catholic Church is wholly
supporting him in this refusal.
Unfortunately it seems that the Roman Catholic Church has absolutely no
problem with these types of activities based on their reaction to this
case, although to their credit they have removed some clergy in the past
over sex abuse allegations. What might be even more troubling is that
one such Catholic priest was later
hired as a supervisor for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
That being said, they are about as far from blameless as they could get,
since Pope Benedict XVI himself refused to remove a priest “who
molested as many as 200 deaf boys, even though several American bishops
repeatedly warned them that failure to act on the matter could embarrass
the church, according to church files newly unearthed as part of a
lawsuit,” according to
The New York Times.
The charges brought against Robert Finn were, in my
opinion, far from adequate seeing as he was only charged with two crimes
and only found guilty of a single misdemeanor charge.
He was found guilty for “failing to report a priest who had taken
hundreds of pornographic pictures of young girls,” according to
The New York Times and each count carried a maximum penalty of up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.
Finn also failed to respond to warnings received by the diocese from a
principal at a parish elementary school which detailed the suspicious
behavior of Reverend Shawn Ratigan around children.
Ratigan plead guilty in August to federal charges of both producing and
attempting to produce child pornography, and prosecutors have stated
that they are looking to sentence him to life in prison for his crimes,
although a sentencing date has yet to be set.
However, Bishop Finn doesn’t even have to actually face this relatively
minor penalty. Finn was sentenced to a mere “two years probation,
suspended,” according to
Courthouse News.
Personally, I find the excuses put forth by Finn’s attorneys to be
nothing short of disgusting. Courthouse News reports, “Finn’s attorneys
said he should not have been charged because he was not the Diocese’s
mandated reporter under the law. That responsibility rested with Vicar
General Robert Murphy at the time, according to The Associated Press.”
In other words, they claim that Finn shouldn’t be responsible because it
wasn’t officially his job. Using this absurd logic, one might be able
to justify never reporting any crime because no particular citizen is
specified as the mandated reporter under the law.
According to the British
Guardian,
despite advocates for the victims of clerical sex abuse challenging the
Vatican directly and calling on the Pope to step up and dismiss Finn
from his position, the church isn’t budging.
“The bishop looks forward to continuing to perform his duties, including
carrying out the important obligations placed on him by the court,”
said Jack Smith, diocese spokesman, in a statement.
Even some Roman Catholics realize just how absurd this is and have
launched a campaign to push for Finn’s resignation which includes a
newly created Facebook page entitled, “
Bishop Finn Must Go.”
Since Pope Benedict XVI alone has the ultimate authority over bishops,
all he would have to do is give the word and Finn would be removed.
This is, in my opinion, a quite unlikely scenario given that, “Through
the decades-long abuse scandal, only one US bishop has stepped down over
his failures to stop abusive clergy: Cardinal Bernard Law, who in 2002
resigned as head of the Archdiocese of Boston,” according to the
Guardian.
One of the more troubling aspects of this case is the fact that Finn was
actually aware of nude photographs of children discovered on Ratigan’s
laptop computer in December of 2010 and still failed to turn him over to
police, instead opting to send Ratigan to live at a convent in
Missouri.
According to court documents, the photographs were eventually handed
over to authorities in May 2011 by Monsignor Robert Murphy against the
wishes of Finn.
Monsignor Murphy turned over the evidence after Ratigan continued to
refuse to stay away from children and not take pictures of them.
While Finn has apologized for the pain his actions (or lack thereof)
caused, he still shows no interest in stepping down from his position.
“Now that our justice system says he’s guilty, he has lost his ability
to lead our diocese,” said a member of the Catholic Church in Kansas
City, Patricia Rotert, to the Guardian. “He’s lost his credibility.
There is turmoil and angst around him and I don’t think he can bring
people together.”
The
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) is now calling for
the Pope to intervene in the situation in a letter penned by SNAP
director David Clohessy.
“Now, for the first time in US history, you have a diocese headed by a
proven criminal,” Clohessy wrote. “You must act if you are serious about
making the church safer for children, discouraging future cover-ups in
child sex cases, and ameliorating the wounds of tens of thousands of
suffering adult victims and millions of betrayed parishioners.”
According to Clohessy, dismissing Finn from his position would “strongly
deter other church officials from acting recklessly, callously and
deceitfully in other child sex cases.”
Hopefully the Pope will no longer cover up the sexual abuse of children
by priests, although given the Pope’s history – and the Roman Catholic
Church in general – I’m not going to hold my breath in anticipation.
Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/roman-catholic-church-continues-to.html