WHO Suspends Vaccine After 26 Children Die in the Developing World

WHO Suspends Vaccine After 26 Children Die in the Developing World

A health worker vaccinates a toddler

Christina England
Activist Post

According to reports, at least 26 children have died and many more have
been seriously injured after they were given the 5 in 1 vaccine,
Quinvaxem. [1] Newspapers have reported that all of the victims suffered
adverse reactions including fevers, vomiting and the appearance of
bruises all over their bodies. [2]

Quinvaxem, being offered at no cost to recipients by UNICEF, is a
pre-qualified vaccine on trial in developing countries. Currently being
given to babies as young as eight weeks of age, this pentavalent vaccine
is said to protect infants and young children against diphtheria,
tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, and Hib (haemophilus influenzae
type b).

According to reports, local authorities have suspended all the
controversial batches for testing. However, the Health Ministry said
there are no problems with the vaccine’s quality, distribution,
preservation or administration. [3]

Although deaths have been reported from Vietnam, Sri
Lanka, Pakistan, Bhutan and India, the World Health Organization (WHO)
has stood by the safety of Quinvaxem, stating that all their studies of
the vaccine, made in South Korea, affirm its safety!






Children Being Used as Guinea Pigs

Once again, here is another example of children dying and many others
suffering horrific side effects from a vaccine being tested on
vulnerable children in developing countries. Isn’t it about time the WHO
stopped pretending that they are in the business of protecting children
and admitted to the fact they are instead part of a world depopulation
program?

I urge readers to read a paper written by Dr. Rebecca Carley titled
"Inoculations: The True Weapons of Mass Destructions Causing VIDS"
(Vaccine-Induced Diseases) (An Epidemic of Genocide) in which she
states:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In fact, the ‘prevention’ of a disease via vaccination is, in reality,
an inability to expel organisms due to the suppression of the
cell-mediated response. Thus, rather than preventing disease, the
disease is actually prevented from ever being resolved. [4]</blockquote>
She saw all these atrocities coming before many others and has been desperately trying to warn the public, ever since.

Possible Kawasaki Disease

It is quite possible that many of these children have suffered an
autoimmune response after being vaccinated with this vaccine. I back up
this opinion with a variety of articles and papers on Kawasaki disease.

Kawasaki disease is an autoimmune disorder that can occur after a
vaccination. In fact, scientists who have studied the illness in depth
say that evidence strongly suggests that an infectious agent, such as a
virus or a vaccine, causes the illness. [5]

Children suffering from Kawasaki disease suffer symptoms very similar to
those suffered by the children vaccinated with Quinvaxem. I have linked
this disorder to the children vaccinated with Quinvaxem because the
disease can cause children to suffer from the following:

• red, bloodshot eyes caused by conjunctivitis, but with no pus
  
• a blotchy, red rash mainly on the trunk of your child’s body or on the genitals
  
• reddened, dry or cracked lips
  
• a red, inflamed tongue with circular white patches that look like a strawberry, often with a red sore throat
  
• large swollen lumps (lymph glands) on either side of your child’s neck
  
• swollen hands and feet which become red and hard, often resulting in
  peeling skin on the fingertips and toes two to three weeks after the
  disease has started
  
• sore throat
  
• cough
  
• sore abdomen (tummy)
  
• vomiting
  
• diarrhea
  
• painful or swollen joints
  

Many children can go on to die of heart failure or heart attack.
Kawasaki disease is said to be the most common cause of acquired heart
disease in children in the UK and the USA. [6]

In a paper written by P.A. Brogan et al. titled “Kawasaki disease: an
evidence based approach to diagnosis, treatment, and proposals for
future research,” the authors state:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In 1967 Tomisaku Kawasaki described 50 Japanese children with an illness
characterized by fever, rash, conjunctival injection, erythema and
swelling of hands and feet, and cervical lymphadenopathy … KD is
commonest in Japan where more than 125 000 cases have been reported. The
disease is also commoner in Japanese and other Oriental children living
abroad. Children aged 6 months to 5 years are most susceptible, with
peak incidence in children aged 9–11 months. Seasonal variation in the
disease incidence has been reported, with peak occurrence in the winter
and spring months. Direct person to person spread is not observed,
although in Japan the disease occurs more commonly in siblings of index
cases with an estimated peak incidence of 8–9% in siblings under the age
of 2 years.</blockquote>
Interestingly, the authors do mention vaccination as a possible trigger:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
… Irritability is an important sign, which is virtually universally
present, although not included as one of the diagnostic criteria. The
exact mechanism of the irritability is unclear, but it may be related to
the presence of aseptic meningitis. Another clinical sign not
incorporated into the diagnostic criteria, but which is relatively
specific to KD, is the development of erythema and induration at sites of BCG immunisations.
The mechanism of this clinical sign is cross reactivity of T cells in
KD patients between specific epitopes of mycobacterial and human heat
shock proteins. With an increasing number of infants receiving the BCG in the UK, it is likely that this sign will become more common, and awareness of it could result in earlier diagnosis and treatment. (emphasis added)</blockquote>
If you read the above statements carefully, you may recognize that the
ages of children at highest risk of contracting the disease are the
precise age at which they receive the highest number of vaccines.

Dr. Michael Innis often refers to the disease in suspected child abuse
cases, saying that the marks and bruising seen in cases of Kawasaki
disease are often mistaken for child abuse. [7]

Three researchers who wrote a paper titled “Kawasaki disease in an
infant following immunization,” published by the National Institutes of
Health, stated in their abstract:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
We here describe a 35 day-old infant who developed Kawasaki disease 1
day after receiving his second dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Although
extremely rare, this possible side effect should be noted and further
investigated. [8]</blockquote>
This paper was written in 2003, so, why isn’t the link between vaccination and KD being thoroughly investigated?

Another
paper titled “Kawasaki disease after vaccination: reports to the
vaccine adverse event reporting system 1990-2007,” stated:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Through October 14, 2007, 107 KD reports were received by VAERS: 26 were
categorized as classic cases, 19 atypical, 52 possible, and 10 were
noncases. Of the 97 cases, 91% were children. [9]</blockquote>
Although the authors concluded that their review did not suggest an
elevated KD risk for RotaTeq or other vaccines, they suggested the
continued post-marketing monitoring for KD was ongoing.

All of these papers suggest that continuous multiple vaccinations may
possibly heighten the risk of young children developing this disease. I
have only offered a selection of many papers for readers to study.

One of the most memorable reminders that KD can and does occur after
vaccinations was written by Lisa Blakemore-Brown in a response to the
Finnish study about the safety of MMR vaccine on the British Medical
Journal in 2001. She wrote:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
If a group of people collapse after eating, say, lemon sole,in a
particular restaurant, it would be ludicrous for those responsible to
wave a hand over the problem saying that millions of people eat Lemon
Sole every day and there are no problems. Health and safety officials
will get straight to the point of the issue and look at the fish in the
restaurant, look at the individuals, test findings in the lab. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
As hundreds of parents have found their children to react to vaccine, in
some cases leading to the ‘new variant autism’ of loss of communication
skills, motor impairments and bowel problems, is it not these cases the
government should be looking at for answers? </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The incidence of this particular tapestry of autism is indisputable.
This is not related to increased recognition of autism, The TYPE is
unusual and baffling to education and health professionals. In one of my
cases of very obvious and indisputable reaction to pertussis vaccine
the child in question has been found to have Kawasaki disease, her own
immune system attacking itself. She presents as Asperger. There is no
autism in the family, but the baby had allergies prior to the vaccine.
It is scientific examination of cases like this which will enable us to
ultimately put measures in place to reassure the public. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Blanket refusal to look at the real issues and prevention of individuals
exercising choice seems a dangerous policy, especially just before an
election. [10]</blockquote>
I have chosen to include her excellent contribution because it really
does have some very strong and firm advice for organizations such as
UNICEF who offer vaccinations to vulnerable children like sweets.

Like Dr. Carley, Ms. Blakemore-Brown’s work has also been discredited.
You have to wonder why, don’t you? Both of them are talented, gifted
professionals, sharing similar concerns across opposite sides of the
world, along with hundreds of others professionals saying exactly the
same statements, many of whom in recent years have become targets of
vicious hate campaigns, before having their careers sabotaged.


Conclusion

It has become second nature for the likes of WHO and UNICEF to offer
free trial and banned vaccinations to the poor and vulnerable
populations in the developing world. These are God’s children, too, and
they are very precious. They are not lab rats or guinea pigs to be
tested at leisure. They are like any other children; they have brothers,
sisters, mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles and grandparents who love them
dearly.

Their innocent parents believe the propaganda being fed to them by the
likes of UNICEF. They believe that these vaccines are safe and will
protect their precious babies. Instead, their children are dying the
most horrific deaths after being given pre-qualified vaccines.

Lisa Blakemore-Brown was right when she said, “Blanket refusal to look
at the real issues and prevention of individuals exercising choice seems
a dangerous policy.” Isn’t it about time to look at the real issues
surrounding vaccination and stop testing innocent and vulnerable
communities with pre-qualified vaccines which are unfit for any purpose?

source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/who-suspends-vaccine-after-26-children.html