Chemtrail Awareness
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Chemtrail Awareness

The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch and do nothing - Albert Einstein
 
HomePortalLatest imagesRegisterLog in

 

 Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Admin
Admin



Posts : 8049
Join date : 2012-05-29
Location : Manchester UK

Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show  Empty
PostSubject: Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show    Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show  Icon_minitimeFri 20 Jul 2012, 10:37


Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show


(NaturalNews) Dr. Rashid Buttar guest-stars on the Robert Scott Bell
Show to talk about Dr. Paul Offit, the devout vaccine entusiast who has
probably ? in Dr. Buttar's words ? singlehandedly poisoned and killed
literally millions of children worldwide. Dr. Buttar and Robert also
cover important, breaking news regarding vaccines, such as the newly
documented admission by the FDA that vaccines still contain mercury.

Robert Scott Bell: I sure would like to extend April Fool's Day,
just one more day, if you can indulge us here on the Robert Scott
Bell Show as we are joined by Dr. Rashid Buttar for some serious
advanced medicine here. April Fool's- I told everybody Dr. Buttar,
yesterday that I was an agent of the CDC. Do you think anybody
believed me?

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Well, considering it was not April 1st maybe they did.

Robert Scott Bell: Yeah, well. What can you do? Anyway, we've
got an April Fool's story to kick into gear today, actually. We got
forwarded a message The Refusers sent out, about Dr. Paul Offit, devout
vaccine prophet. This was a story that made both of us laugh out
loud.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Yeah this was hilarious. This was actually,
it would be actually very, very close to the actual occurrences were he
actually to take this challenge that Dr. Blaylock put out, but, I
mean it is almost like you could make an assumption that this would be
what the reality would be were the 100,000 vaccines to be taken.
Amazing, this was a really funny story. Did you already read this,
Robert?

Robert Scott Bell: No, I'd only gotten it moments before you
did, so we kinda went through it at the same time and when I saw the
headline I thought, ok this is a great April Fool's headline because
knowing Dr. Offit- for those that don't know who Dr. Offit is, I mean
he literally is a shill for the vaccine industry. There is nothing a
vaccine can do that is harmful, and it can only help, and he's an
attack dog. If anybody comes out and even questions it. The science or
anything. Literally the guy is like the vicious dog that's salivating
just to go after you.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: But he's also the guy who developed a lot of
these vaccines, he's, you look at him and you can see corruptness
written write across his face. I mean the guy is probably the most
disgusting and disgraceful piece of human specimen that has ever faced
this Earth. Can you tell that I don't like the guy?

Robert Scott Bell: We share that, we don't like him that much. Why? Because he does not stand for true science. In fact this story-

Dr. Rashid Buttar: More than that, Robert, it's more than that.
He singlehandedly has probably poisoned and killed literally millions
of children worldwide. This guy makes Hitler look like a nice guy as
far as I'm concerned. There's a reason that he's had death threats and
there's a reason that he's had to have, you know, security placed
around him because he's so, or has requested security because his life
has been threatened. I think he's Satan incarnated, personally.

Robert Scott Bell: Really? Wow. Well, it's intense but when you
understand what's behind that, and we'll go through a few of those
things. In a challenge to neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, who we've
talked about here, I interviewed him years ago, basically Dr. Offit
had taken 100,000 vaccines, injected by his wife, pediatrician Dr.
Bonnie Offit, and ended up in the hospital. That's the April Fool's
story. And it goes on from there. What were the highlights?

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Oh it's so funny because it says that Dr.
Offit stated that, ?as I've stated in October 2005, Parent's Pack
Newsletter from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, that my studies
show healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once,
and I intend to demonstrate this to debunk the false prophets of the
vaccine-autism link once and for all.' So according to the story he was
going to take 100,000 vaccines and then it says that Dr. Offit
received 38 injections per square inch of his body in the marathon
vaccine injection session. At 38 vaccines, he developed convulsions and
was admitted to Philadelphia Children's Hospital with severe cases of
atypical measles, chickenpox, pertussis, pneumonia, rotavirus and
encephalitis. This hospital issued a statement stating that Dr. Offit
was probably faking his symptoms because scientific studies show that
vaccines have been proven to be 100 percent safe and effective and
never cause adverse reactions.

Robert Scott Bell: I mean this was brilliant, utilizing all of
his language against him, because he did actually claim that they could
take 100,000 vaccines at once, did he not?

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Absolutely, he did.

Robert Scott Bell: That is the most bizarre thing that you could
ever do. How he sleeps at night, unless he's on multiple meds. A
spokesman for Merck, which made 99,999 of the 100,000 vaccines said,
?Sometimes neurological diseases occur in a random temporal association
with vaccination. Correlation is not causation. No one should know
this better than Dr. Offit and we refuse to take responsibility for his
health problems. If he erroneously believes that vaccines have caused
his illnesses he should just apply to the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Act for relief. It was created expressly to protect
innocent vaccine manufacturers like us from frivolous lawsuits from
so-called vaccine adverse reaction victims.'

Dr. Rashid Buttar: And you know, this is so funny because this
is the stance by the pharmaceutical companies, it's exactly how they
take the stance. They act as if they're the victims and that everybody
that has ever applied to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
program is an opportunist. Whereas in fact, these were people that were
healthy, had no problems, the children had no problems until they
were vaccinated and then they ended up having these debilitating
symptoms and some of these children are going from completely
neuro-typic development to severe autism, convulsions, encephalitis
type pictures. We've seen children becoming blind and precocious
puberty and all sorts of other crazy things.

Robert Scott Bell: Well, from his hospital bed the funny April
1st article goes, Dr. Offit gave this response: 'Now I understand how
the vaccines are injuring children and adults. I promise to work to
correct the great injustice that I have personally inflicted on
innocent vaccine victims. If I ever recover from this paralytic
neurological damage caused by vaccination, I will work tirelessly to
ensure that such a thing never happens to another innocent child.' Now
this is brilliant, I don't know if you'd call it parody, but certainly
as an April Fool's thing it was brilliantly constructed. Based on
facts, like the statement that he made.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Absolutely, the paragraph before that says
the Chief Special Master of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program's Kangaroo Court issued a statement saying ?Unfortunately, Dr.
Offit's symptoms are not covered under our program. There's absolutely
no scientific evidence showing that vaccines can cause the diseases
they were designed to prevent. Dr. Offit is mistaken if he believes he
can mock the system with his phony vaccine injury claims.' I was just
dying when I read that. They referred to the vaccine injury claims as
being phony, which is exactly what they do. And Offit's said that
publicly numerous times, I mean, I really like this. In fact, I'm going
to make a copy of this and I'm going to save this. Hopefully one day,
this will become reality and Offit will take Dr. Blaylock's challenge
and inject himself, but you know, between Robert you and I, any human
being if they got 100 vaccines at one time would have severe problems
and there's no way someone could have more than 200 vaccines and
still be alive as far as I'm concerned. I mean, maybe 200, 250, but he
made this comment 100,000 vaccines. That is the most absurd thing.
100,000 of anything- 100,000 aspirins will kill you, 100,000 whatever
will kill you, it's just absurd. Even 100,000 apples, which is a
healthy thing, will kill you.

Robert Scott Bell: I think he would faint at the sight of his first needle, but that's just me.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: I agree with you.

Robert Scott Bell: Now, NaturalNews just covered a story on
April 1st and it wasn't an April Fool's joke. In fact it was the FDA
admitting in a court case that vaccines still contain mercury. Now this
is not news to you or I. This is something I want to reiterate here
that those that are under the illusion that somehow at a certain point
that they've started going, hmm, maybe mercury is there, we better
pull it out- that it was actually pulled out, this basically puts that
to rest that we knew it. I want you to comment on that fact as well.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Well Robert this is a very important story as
far as I'm concerned because the vast majority of the public, when
talking with them when I have patients coming or when I'm giving a
presentation somewhere and I make this comment about the vaccines still
containing mercury, most people, the vast majority, I would say 85%
plus, look at me like I'm crazy and make the statement, something to
the extent, "well, that was taken out back in the early 2000's." People
still think that the FDA, the FTC, the governmental agencies, the CDC
had already taken out mercury. We've talked about this on the show
numerous times, when Congressman Dan Burton as far as 8 years ago, in
fact, no almost even longer than that, it was 2003, asked for criminal
sanctions to be brought against the FDA and the FTC after asking the
head of the FDA and the FTC why are there four different batches of
four different kinds of vaccine that we have tested independently and
seen that there is not only thimerosal but other types of substances
such as aluminum and nickel, etc., in these vaccines and yet the label
says it's thimerosal-free. Thimerosal, for those that may not know, is
ethel-mercury, it's a biologically more active form than inorganic
mercury and inorganic mercury is known to be the second most toxic
substance known to man. And of course the reason that was given back to
Congressman Dan Burton was that previously they would add
ethel-mercury or thimerosal to a vial to make the complete vaccination
back in 2001, 2000-2001 time frame, after the CDC recommended, didn't
mandate but recommended to the vaccine companies to consider taking
out thimerosal, what they started doing was instead of adding the
thimerosal to the vaccine and then the actual vaccine into a vial,
they stopped adding the thimerosal to the vaccine but what they did
was they used it in the manufacturing process and that was the reason
that the Federal Trade Commission gave to Congressman Dan Burton- that
because it is no longer added to the vial, because it's pre-added
when we're manufacturing it, there's no requirement to label the vial
that has mercury. So now they can actually put thimerosal-free on
those vaccines.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] Because, Dr. Buttar, it's there naturally.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] Exactly, it's there naturally. These
are the types of things that people don't know and the government
continues to create these illusions that everything is safe and
everything is hunky-dory and in actuality, not only is the offending
action continuing but it's actually continuing in a much larger scale
because now the people that are consciously trying to abstain from
certain activities that would prevent them from being exposed to these
toxins now have this false sense of security that everything's ok. So
they partake in it, thinking that part's been taken care of and in
actuality it hasn't.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]This was the whole idea of greening
the vaccines movement, as well, Dr. Buttar. That somehow if we don't
have as much of the bad stuff it's now considered green, then they say
it's naturally occurring, they're just making that up. Like grape
juice naturally contains less than ? percent of alcohol, this is not
what we're talking about, a botanical or a food in these injectable
forms. I think perhaps the only way they could make a vaccine safe is
if it were only saline and nothing else.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Well, Robert, you look at the
movement, the green movement now, this is what you bring up it's a very
interesting point because look at the bulbs, the light bulbs. Now
they're saying that these are the green light bulbs and they have
mercury in them. It's under the same pretense, it's exactly what you're
saying and it's not so far-fetched what you just said, maybe it's
extreme, but it's not too extreme. What they're actually doing, they're
actually using the green movement as a shield to increase the
toxicity that we're being exposed to. I mean just think about how many
people have dropped a bulb, an incandescent bulb and broken it. I
mean, everybody does it, it's a normal thing. Now when you break it
you're gonna have a hazardous, chemical spill that using the current
standards that are put out by OSHA, would require a school to shut
down, HAZ-MAT suit individuals to come in, and wall that area off as a
biologically hazard waste, biologically hazard, what do they call it,
spill site.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Listen, Dr. Buttar, think about that,
what you just said because it's very important. How often are light
bulbs broken in daily life? I don't mean we break one everyday, but
look around at the millions of people and hundreds of millions of light
bulbs there are. It's a pretty normal occurrence. Now, if indeed
these so-called green light bulbs, which are the mercury CFLs, are
dropped and such, how often are we hearing about HAZ-MAT teams being
called in to clean these things up?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] Exactly. There's not enough HAZ-MAT
teams on this planet and all the other planets if you put them together
to even cover one country, let alone a continent or the whole world.
It's ridiculous that they're doing this. Everyone that I know, Robert,
is going out and buying as many incandescent bulbs as they possibly
can. I'm not going to have any of those bulbs in my house, those
mercury bulbs.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] I'm almost thinking of traveling with
bulbs. You know, when I go to these hotels and they have them in
there, I unscrew them. I hate the light. Just the energy coming from
them is just awful. Now when we come back from this break, I'm gonna
reveal something to everyone because I was just up at the 10th
amendment center's Nullify Now conference about this very issue of
these so-called broken light bulbs. And if you go out shopping for home
goods and light bulbs, you might want to know this before you go to
some of these places that I'll tell you about. With Dr. Buttar here on
Advanced Medicine Monday on the Robert Scott Bell show, after this.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] If you go to a home improvement
center, you might want to take extra selenium or some homeopathic
remedies to detox the mercury. Why do I say that? Well, at the 10th
Amendment Center's Nullify Now conference, I met a lot of great people
there, found a lot of fans of the Robert Scott Bell show as well. One
guy in particular came up to me and told me that he loves learning
about what we talk about here, Dr. Buttar, but he says he works at one
of those and I'm not gonna name whether it's a Home Depot or a Lowe's
or one of those. But it's a home improvement warehouse kind of place
and he says about those mercury bulbs because I mentioned them in my
talk, and he says, I can't tell you how many times we'll get these
pallets of the stuff and they'll be dropped and broken and I asked him
point blank just like I mentioned before the break, I asked do you call
the HAZ-MAT teams to clean them up? He says, never once did they ever
do that. So think about that on that scale anytime you go into one of
those places you can bet that they've broken mercury bulbs regularly.
And if you're there, you might want to take precaution.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]And as much as I hate saying it,
Robert, selenium is not gonna do anything if you've been exposed to
inorganic mercury at that scale? Selenium's not going to protect you.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]No, I'm just talking about building
it up all the time. For the worker, they're gonna be toast, but for
those in the back and you're exposed at a counter, still. It's still
tremendous detriment to anybody's health to be out there unknowingly
inhaling mercury vapor just when you're going for a new toilet seat.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]There's nothing that I know of, I
don't care how many IV DMSP treatments or whatever you do, that's gonna
protect you from that type of exposure. To me, that's like murder. I
don't know how anybody could survive that type of exposure and these
workers, especially those workers. I mean one person coming in and
being exposed, that mercury vapor's going to have dissipated to a
certain extent, but a person that's right there when they break it, and
especially recurrent exposure? Dentists that are dealing with
amalgams? They have just now had their, they're no longer the highest
risk group. Dentists and dental hygienists are no longer the high
exposure group. It's these people that are working those docks.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah, it's extraordinary. I wish, I
didn't ever think of it before and I wasn't shocked but at the same
time I was. Because we know how these things happen to green things and
then they ignore the unintended consequences, which is what happens
when government gets involved every time. Yet now we have to take even
more precautions everywhere we go. So this is just another level of
warning or another layer of warning for everybody about this. Now, what
about the issue of cancer? Now this is something that you and I've
talked about a lot, Dr. Buttar, and you've helped so many people and
yet there's a lot of what they call scientific studies that are
supposed to be gold standard stuff which we've also kinda blown the lid
on a lot of that. But there's a new article here that just came out
saying that like 87% of these so-called landmark cancer studies cannot
be duplicated. And those are the studies that are utilized to
authorize and support and approve treatments in traditional allopathic
oncology.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Yeah the standard of care- they love
using that phrase- the standard of care, as if the standard of care
actually has some validity. Their standard of care is basically made up
of a bunch of conjecture and they pull it out of thin air. And this
article clearly states that- what is that, 85%?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]87% can't be duplicated. Now what
does that mean? If you can't duplicate a study, wouldn't that call into
question the basis for an entire realm of treatments?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Absolutely. In fact, if you can't
replicate a study, it's not a study. The whole purpose of this, which
they refer to as evidence-based, which is nothing based on evidence.
It's so oxymoronic what they say. Because what doctors that are
practicing medicine holistically, integrative doctors, what I do in my
clinic, that is proved on evidence. That is based on evidence. They
take our term, based upon evidence, evidence based, and they call- they
now refer that "evidence based" and contort it somehow, some type of
metamorphosis occurs and they use the double-blind, placebo-controlled
crossover study, and they call that evidence-based. And yet here is
exactly proof that that evidence-based medicine is not evidence-based. I
hope I'm not confusing people now. Calling it evidence-based, which
has nothing to do with evidence. This double-blind, placebo-controlled
crossover multiple center trial is the way they're doing it. It's not
legitimate. In fact, if it was legitimate it would be able to be
reproduced. Now, I'll give you an example, Robert. I just did a
double-blind, placebo-controlled study based on these energy bands. It
was a crossover trial. Just to see subjectively what people are
seeing. One of the things we found out doing that study was an
interesting correlation. We found out that as many people in the
experimental group that saw benefit- the same number in the placebo
group saw benefit, which means that the placebo and the real thing
didn't have any effect. It was like 26 to 5 or 26 to 6 that saw a
benefit in the placebo group and in the real thing. But then we crossed
them over, and the cross over means you take the placebo group, the
people that aren't on the real thing, and put them into the real thing,
and then see what they experience. And we had more than 80% of the
group that crossed over said oh, I thought I was getting a benefit,
now I can clearly see the benefit, feel the benefit. So you still had
the crossover group on the placebo group, when they cross over to the
experimental side, actually experienced a benefit. And the conclusion
of that study, I made a comment about this. I said that even though in
the beginning the placebo group saw the same benefit as the other
group, when we crossed them over, the placebo group was then aware
that what they thought was a benefit, that they weren't having one.
They were able to distinctly experience the benefit when they were on
the real thing. But it goes to the point that regardless, if so many
people had a benefit from placebo, why are we not using the placebo?
What difference does it make if it's a placebo or not placebo if
you're getting a benefit? That's the whole point. That we should be
using this free tool that the creator has given us to elicit a
response in individuals, especially when it doesn't cost any money, it
doesn't cost any effort. It's just an illusion, but the power of the
mind is so amazing that it can elicit a response. So the placebo
aspect is something that I think medicine should actively-

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] Should be embraced, not denigrated.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Exactly. It should be embraced and
not denigrated. Absolutely. But this point, now this cancer study goes
to the other extreme and shows that what they're saying is science is
actually a bunch of?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Oh my goodness, well, the effect as
we say the placebo effect should be embraced, not denigrated. And on
top of that, when we go to the 87 percent of the cancer studies that
are supposed to be seminal and landmark that prove efficacy of
treatment and goes into the standard of care, which we know is
sub-standard. And that's an understatement. We now have to recognize
that most all of modern medicine is operating in an insane asylum and
they're somehow tricking us to be part of it. Now thankfully, Dr.
Buttar and others have woken up and called them on it, which is why
they've been attacked all these years, and which is why I left them.
The thoughts of being part of the medical profession years ago, because
of what I saw it do to me. But many more millions of people around
the world are now waking up and are seeing this and rather than
looking at us funny are looking at their old doctors who don't see this
yet and going, you don't know this?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Robert, I'll tell you, something
really funny happened this last weekend. I had a guy that called me,
his wife has cancer. They had a consult. The wife, the brother-in-law,
who is a vet, the patient herself and her husband are all on the
phone, and the man starts to tell me about his wife. He's clearly
concerned about her. She's got stage II "b" cancer. And come to find
out that he owns like seven different surgical centers employing like
30 different doctors or 20 different doctors, I don't remember how
many doctors. And they're close family friends of doctors, this and
that, everybody- the guy has all the access to medical professionals
that he needs, and they, when his wife got cancer, they asked their
opinions but they didn't want to do anything that the specialists were
saying, and more than half of the doctors that he employs told him
that if it was my wife, I would not let her do chemo or radiation.
These are conventional guys, these aren't integrative guys. I was
amazed when he told me that.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Well this continues things that I've
witnessed over the years, we've talked about as well. Many docs that
would consult me as a homeopath, their family members or they
themselves had severe issues and said I'm not putting myself through
what I do to others, which is sort of horrific if you think about it.
At the same time if we thought that that part of medicine is over, it's
still going on, as evidenced by what you just saw. And you just shake
your head and go, how do these people do it? How can they feel good
about what they do when they go to work everyday?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] How can they live with themselves?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]This is the consciousness I guess
that we have that maybe not everybody does. But we certainly feel like
that in our audience the consciousness is there because of the support
we're getting, the enthusiasm, and go get ?em guys kind of attitude.
We had that out there at the Nullify Now event as well. People were
very excited to learn about these things. I talked a lot about the
idea that we each have a constitution, you know, as we focal-point on
the 10th amendment and the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, I said
lest we forget, our own constitution. Because if you think you can
actively support, defend, or let's say re-establish the one that's on
the federal level without supporting your own constitution, you will
not have the energy to do so. You will be weakened, you will be
drugged, you will be enslaved to the pharmaceutical complex that keeps
you down, and what we're trying to do is wake people up. And what
that body that we're supporting here is the big part of that ability.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] And I think that if you weren't doing
that, Robert, if we weren't effectively doing that on this radio
show, I don't think you would've been nominated, don't think your show
would've been nominated as the top, what is it, the top five shows at
the live event?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah, the live event and thank you
for bringing that up again to remind everybody to please vote. We'll
have that link in today's show notes as well. The ALive Foundation, the
big event, the Academy Awards for health, health freedom. Dr. Buttar
will be there as well and that's up in New York, June 29th and 30th.
The Robert Scott Bell show was nominated for best health show, and
we're up against some good shows, as well. We appreciate your support
and votes and spread the word.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Absolutely, I think that's great.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]So the cancer thing. The cancer
thing, though. I mean, I just- I don't have to be outraged, I don't
have to outrage for effect or anything because I just read that and
anybody that reads that and finds out that 87 percent of the seminal,
landmark studies can't be duplicated. It's like, come one, isn't the
jig up by now?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Well, I think that it's coming very
close to being up, but until that death struggle is complete, they'll
still try to perpetuate their misinformation as much as they possibly
can.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah, the Bruce Willis movies come to
mind. Die Hard, and then Die Hard With a Vengeance, where they try to
lash out and get more people involved in this through coercive means
like through Obama care. That's a big thing, the Supreme Court's
deciding or mulling over that whole issue of the individual mandate.
We're gonna see the rise of the 10th amendment on a level that we've
never seen before since the days of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison,
if they declare it on the Supreme Court level constitutional. Because
I know personally hundreds, if not thousands that have told me
there's no way that I am complying. I've put up with it this much but
that's one step too far. If they tell me I have to participate, forget
it, they can come and get me. That's what I'm hearing.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Well Robert I'm gonna be among that
group that's saying come and get me because I have not paid for health
insurance since I got out of the military in 1996. My employees have
it, my family has it, but I refuse to partake in the health insurance
scam. I mean it's been what? 16 years since I had health insurance and
that was when I got out of the army in 1996. So I'm going to be among
those people, but you know this is actually patho-pnuemonic [sic] of
everything that's been going on now, like this other article that you
sent me about the 4H aspect.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Oh yeah, we gotta cover that, let's
take a quick break so we have more time to cover it but yeah it looks
like the Obama administration's not satisfied with coming after you for
Obama care but now it wants to prevent your children from working
with you on your family farm. This is shocking stuff coming up after
this. Remember, all the notes are up on Robertscottbell.com, including
the links to Dr. Buttar and his amazing top-selling, best-selling
book The Nine Steps to Keep the Doctor Away. If you haven't gotten it
yet, please do so. We'll be right back after this.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Remember, you can always call us at
866-939-Bell, 866-939-2355, leave a message 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week. If you have a question for Dr. Buttar, the next Advanced Medicine
Monday we'll include it in the show. Right now Dr. Buttar, this is
amazing. Now you have a ranch, you're growing things, you've got
animals. This new thing, and I've got the story, I'll link it up in the
show notes, what is this 4H? Tell us about this because you knew
about it immediately when I sent this to you.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Well Robert, 4H is actually a youth
organization very similar to the Future Farmers of America, which is a
similar organization but that's usually to do with school. In other
words, FFA, Future Farmers of America is a school organization. 4H is
more like the Boy Scouts, except it's agriculturally related. 4H, it
stands for the head, hands, heart and health, which is on their symbol,
which is a clover. But essentially, it's like a Future Farmer of
America organization. Very, very popular. Pretty much everybody in
rural America knows the 4H club. Now it's amazing to me that the heart
and soul of America, which was built upon ranches and farms, that this
organization has founded those principles of agriculture, animal
husbandry, etc. They're going to try to remove children from being
taught this very, very basic, elemental aspect of agriculture and of
sustainability? I mean, my son is all over the ranch. He knows how to
operate every piece of equipment. I mean, we don't let him, but he can.
He gets on his quad and he gets on the golf carts and of course he
can do the tractors too, but we don't let him get on the tractors. But
it's absurd to say that because 23 out of 100,000 children die?what
about the, what about the 100, or 200, or 500, or 1,000 children that
die from every 100,000 vaccines that are given? Or more? What about
that?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Well, the Obama administration has
not come out and said it wants to ban vaccines in children, or children
getting vaccines, but yet, working on the farm- that's why it begs
the question. What, or who, is to gain? Because with everything we've
seen these administrations, and Bush before, as well, do is for the
benefit of certain sectors of the monopoly type economy. And of
course, big-agra businesses- I'm not saying they're hurting bad yet,
but they are starting to get a dent or chink in their invincibility
because more people are moving toward kinda primal diet lifestyle,
these free-grazing animals, not the multi-national corporate and
factory farming methods. People are starting to move away from that.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Well, that's one of the reasons that I
have our own livestock, I have everything ourselves, and one of my
neighbors told me, you do know they could come and take anything the
want whenever they want. I said, well, that's where the right to bear
arms comes into the picture.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah. Well, also that comes to- I saw
Sheriff Mack, Richard Mack [sic] who is like a brilliant sheriff, at
the Nullify Now conference as well. And he's doing his level best to
educate all the sheriffs on their superior status on the local, county
level. When unconstitutional federal actions or agents come in under
color of law, the sheriff has the right, duty and obligation to throw
them back out. You know what we need to do, I'll just throw this out
there for you. We need to somehow sponsor- I mentioned this to Sheriff
Mack, it's a hard thing to put on, but sponsor some kind of sheriff's
meeting, like in North Carolina, like in Florida. Get these stunts on a
state level to bring Richard Mack in, and others, and it would
transform the terrain immediately.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Robert, my plan was to actually have a
copy of Sheriff Mack's book for each of the 100 counties in North
Carolina, for each of the sheriffs. We were gonna invite them to our
office and actually do a presentation and then give them all a copy of
the book because I want to do this for the whole state of North
Carolina. And this happened, actually, the month we were planning on
doing this, we decided in November of 2007 to do this, but it was the
same month the medical board filed those false charges against me. So I
got a little sidetracked with that.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]That's a bizarre timing of coincidence there.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Yeah, well, that's what we were
planning on doing because I had our auditorium as you know from the old
office, 120 seating conference room. And we had everything planned
out, and we'd already contacted the association and found out what the
pricing of the books were, which we could get the books for $10 a
book, and we had gotten a listing of all the North Carolina sheriffs.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Well, let's not give up on that idea. There's gotta be a way to revitalize it because it's become more important than ever.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]I've got all the infrastructure
already in place. We know exactly how to get the listing of them, we
got the past sheriffs and the current sheriffs, the listings with their
phone numbers, their email addresses, their office addresses, contact
information. We had everything, mail merge letter created, ready to
send out to them, letting them know that it was going to be no charge
to them, come, all you have to do is come to our facility and watch
this presentation. We have a free copy of the book for them. We had
everything planned.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] Wow. Well, listen, I'm in touch with
Sheriff Mack, so if we want to revitalize, reactivate anytime, it's
one of the most vitally important and efficient- you know we talk
about efficient action. It's not just action for actions sake. It's
action that actually makes a difference. Very powerful. That's why the
concept of the sheriff's ability to nullify federal mandates,
unconstitutional, they're no longer force of law, they're sort of kind
of legal maneuverings and wranglings. This is a very efficient means
so we could probably talk off the air if we can reactivate that.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Absolutely, I would love to.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Very exciting. Very exciting. Listen,
there's so many stories to cover that are coming out. We talked about
this in the early part of 2012, this was a year of shift. The shift
is most definitely on. I saw it with the standing-room only crowds at
the Nullify Now conference, I mean, people from all backgrounds, walks
of life. And as I've always said, the idea to talk health is
something that disarms people because it isn't Republican or Democrat
or left or right. It becomes yeah, I want the freedom to choose a
healing or healer that I think is right for me. And so it's something
that you have, Dr. Buttar, as a doctor, as well. You take care of
people that have different religious backgrounds, different
philosophical backgrounds, political backgrounds, and all have a bottom
line: can you help me? It's like, yes, we can.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] Because it's universal, Robert. It
transcends all cultural, ethnic, religious bounds. It transcends
everything. It transcends geography. It's basically one thing that
everyone needs for themselves and wants for themselves and for their
loved ones.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Well this is the kind of doctor
danger that I like. We've talked about the danger of doctors. In this
case, the danger of doctors could be that they bring everybody together
for freedom, you know, the ones that are awake. People will set aside
a lot of their differences when it comes to, well, I want to live. I
want to be healthy. Ok, I don't care what your political beliefs are,
let's go.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]I agree with you, Robert. I think
that that's one of the things where the commonality of people's beliefs
is what brings them together and allows them to accomplish something
that's extraordinary.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] I always found, you know our friend
Nick Gonzalez, he's terrific. He's a brilliant guy, and people don't
realize he's a conservative guy, right. Cause he's got a Hollywood
clientele, the ultra-rich left that come to see him for cancer, and
they all assume he's a lefty like them, right? He's like this
ultra-conservative guy. Great guy, but he doesn't refuse treatment to
anyone because they're left of center. The point is, it's just funny,
people assume what they are is what their doctor is. Maybe because you
don't typically talk politics with your doctor. But the idea is,
freedom will bring us together.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] I agree with you a hundred percent.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah, so it's funny how that goes.
Doctors are dangerous to people, but we can change things around and
make them dangerous to those who would want to enslave people. Hey,
another story that just came up on the horizon here, aspirin. They
still promote aspirin, even the Life Extension Foundation, and they do a
lot of good work. I think Faloon [sic] is a good guy. They still
promote this kinda concept that an aspirin a day will be good for your
cardiovascular system. I think there are better ways to go. I know
what science they're referencing, but here's a story that's
referencing off NaturalNews. That it may increase your risk of cancer,
not prevent cancer.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]I'm not actually aware of the studies
where they try to claim that aspirin would be a prevention against
cancer. I'm only aware of the cardiovascular aspect.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yes, and that I agree, that's what we
would acknowledge. We've seen that But in this case, what they're
also finding, I guess, more often than not I think of it as a vascular
thing and not a cancer thing, but the fact that it may be causing or
increasing the rates of cancer. That's gotta be a little bit
interesting to somebody, right?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Sure, absolutely. Actually, in this
particular article they did say that they're finding it to be counter
to the original studies showing that aspirin was preventative for
cancer. I wasn't even aware of that, I've never even heard that before,
but that's what they're saying. And they found that it was actually
counter to that original supposition, that it actually increases the
risk of cancer and pancreatic cancer. But that's interesting that
they're talking about pancreatic cancer and they're talking about doing
two aspirins a day for I don't know how many years they did it, but
it was 58% more likely to develop pancreatic cancer if they did two
aspirins a day. And if they went up to 14 aspirin a day it was 86% more
likely to develop pancreatic cancer. But just think about this now.
This is a non-steroidal. Basically, if you're dealing with a
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or you're dealing with the
salycilate type drugs, tell me what is the biggest issue for the average
person that we have to be concerned about? Forget about
cardiovascular disease for a second.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Sure, we're talking about stomach and gastrointestinal bleeding.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Exactly, the ulcers, the renal
effects. That's what we have to think about. So, if it's gonna affect
the stomach and the gastrointestinal system, it's not that big of a
leap to think, ok, yeah, you can elicit some type of chronic
inflammatory cascade that would affect the pancreas. So I'm not
surprised by that. What I do find interesting, though, is that regular
use of aspirin is linked to heart attack, stroke, gastrointestinal
bleeding, organ damage and death. I see the heart attack and stroke.
That's an interesting component because that's actually traditionally
what we've used aspirin to prevent. And just for the listeners, I think
it's important to mention the entire mechanism of action of aspirin is
not known. Aspirin comes from a derivative of natural willow bark,
but what is interesting is the mechanism that's used to prevent heart
disease and stroke by using aspirin is basically to thin the blood, to
make it less?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yes, coagulatable. I love that.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Yes, thank you. Less coagulatable,
exactly. To make it less viscous, to prevent it from clotting,
essentially. And so it's essentially a thinner, blood thinner is
essentially why they're using aspirin. So this part of it is new to me-
linked to heart attack and stroke. Now, the caveat here Robert is,
remember that this is popular- well this is actually Natural News, but
the misinformation out there, how much of this could be intentional
misinformation? Not that NaturalNews is going to promote
misinformation, but if it's been picked up, I don't know what to think
about that because I'll tell you the truth, if I have a patient that's
having an acute onset of chest pain that sounds like it may be
cardiac, where they've got shortness of breath, diaphoresis, which is
sweating, and some nausea going on, they've got crushing chest pain,
I'm gonna give them a baby aspirin, maybe two baby aspirins, maybe
even four baby aspirins.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b] Sure, but that's what the science supports, too.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Exactly, it does. And we know that
people, it's been a mainstay, it's worked. I've seen people- it saved
their life, essentially.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Versus the chronic use, I think
that's the different issue and you have been outspoken ever since we've
been connected on the chronic use of any end-stage because of all the
reasons we've covered. And you can go back to hundreds- it feels like
hundreds of hours. There's lots of hours of archives that you and
I've been talking about some great, great stuff here. So, none of it
ever expires or goes bad. That's another beautiful thing about it- no
preservatives necessary. Now the aspirin thing here as well, I
remember the dampening, what they called the eicosanoids. I remember
reading that the ?adamo' [sic] was talking about that years ago. But
there was some awareness of the autocrine system and how aspirin would
impact negatively that system.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]That's true, Robert. There are a lot
of things that the chronic use of aspirin will definitely do. The
inhibition of prostaglandins and some of these other components, that's
obviously a big issue with aspirin. I don't recommend using aspirin
for anything except in an acute case where someone's staring to have
this particular problem, like crushing chest pain, shortness of breath,
sweating and nausea. That pretty much is a classic for acute
myocardia infarction. If you're somewhere and you're getting this,
yes, take the aspirin. That's what I recommend. I don't use aspirin
for anything else. I don't tell people to take aspirin for anything
else, I don't care if you've got a headache, pain, whatever, don't use
an aspirin. There's so many other things that are so much better to
use. But if you're going to take something for anti-coagulation or to
help to thin the blood, nattokinase is beautiful. It's one of the most
effective things. Actually, taking natural ginger the size of your
pinkie- take a piece of ginger and measure it against your pinkie, the
actual width and length of your pinkie finger nail, and then take
that piece of ginger, chop it up into small pieces with a sharp knife
and then scrape that up, throw it inside a cup and then put some hot
water in there. Drink that tea and then take the actual remnants of
the ginger and just eat them after that. Every other day, you're gonna
have a beautiful anti-coagulant. A very effective, natural
anti-coagulant. And I, whenever I eat sushi that's the one thing I do. I
load up on so much ginger, they tell me, so you like a little bit of
sushi with your ginger.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Hey, Dr. Buttar, we could have a
contest, you and I getting together to go have sushi. Who could have
the most of that ginger. I always ask, can you bring some more of that
ginger?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] That's what they tell me, they tell me all the time, would you like some sushi with that ginger you ordered?

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yes! That's it, you and me, that's
right. I love it. Listen, we gotta take a break. We've got a short few
minutes. Man, the time flies when Dr. Buttar and I get together.
Advanced Medicine Monday continues, remember The Nine Steps to Keep the
Doctor Away. I've got a question about young kids going through
puberty, younger and younger and younger, for Dr. Buttar when we come
back from this break.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Children appear to be entering
puberty at earlier and earlier ages. It's not an illusion, it's
happening. The New York Times has this article out, "Puberty Before Age
10: A New Normal." Look, this is crazy, what's happening, Dr. Buttar.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]I mean this is absurd, the new
normal? They're actually talking about all the xenoestrogenic,
phytoestrogenic, all the synthetic estrogens that have been introduced
to our environment that people are being exposed to. That's what's
causing this increased onset of puberty earlier on.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Yeah, and the FDA recently said it wasn't going to ban bisphenol A.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] Yeah, it's unbelievable.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]So they want-why? Why would they want
this endocrine disruption? What does it serve them? I mean, in
addition to the so-called new normal of early puberty, aren't we seeing
increasing rates of infertility in both men and women?

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Infertility, childhood cancers, etc., etc. The list goes on and on. There's all sorts of things we see.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]So what we're dealing with here is
the FDA, I'm acknowledging, as we have for a long time, there's no way
to reform the FDA. In my opinion, it should be abolished. It's about
defending the indefensible.

[b]Dr. Rashid Butter:
[/b]Well, Robert, I want to tell you
something, but I'm definitely not going to do it on the air. It's
something we're going to hold back and see if it comes to fruition. But
if it comes to fruition, there's something that I'm planning. It all
depends on certain circumstances. So for everybody listening, hold the
intention. But I actually might be doing something hopefully to
spearhead the move against the FDA.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Don't tell anybody, you've heard it here, but you didn't.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b] It wasn't very smart of me to do
that, but anyway, as far as the mechanism and how it's going to be
done, we're not going to talk about that. But it's interesting where
we're going because this may be the year.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]And you're not the only one, as we
know. I don't want everyone to focus on Dr. Buttar for this but the
reality is there's a lot of movement coming up. We'll recognize what
we've been talking about for years here. And by the way, just to harken
back to the new normal of puberty under ten, chapter 11 of Dr.
Buttar's book, The Nine Steps to Keep the Doctor Away, a critical
chapter on modulating and re-normalizing the endocrine system.

[b]Dr. Rashid Buttar:
[/b]Yeah, it actually does talk a lot
about that. We talk about the negative inhibitory feedback loop. So,
yeah, thanks for bringing that up, Robert. That is a good chapter to
get people to understand what the issues really are.

[b]Robert Scott Bell:
[/b]Well, there's never enough time when
we get together but it's always a blast. People can re-listen if we go
through anything too quickly. Thank you, Dr. Buttar, as well, thank
you to Heather Woods, Tom Woods' wife for coming on board from Nullify
Now. We got to play that in the first hour. And of course, for all of
you out there, remember what we're talking about is or should be
accessible to you because we're bringing you the principles you can
apply for healing in your own lives. As Dr. Buttar brings that to you
in his daily practice, as well with his book, that is this: the power
to heal is yours.


Source:-


http://www.naturalnews.com/035842_Rashid_Buttar_vaccines_Robert_Scott_Bell.html











<table><tr><td>

</td></tr></table>



Back to top Go down
 
Dr. Rashid Buttar talks vaccines on the Robert Scott Bell Show
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Vaccination myths destroyed by Robert Scott Bell on national radio
»  vaccine Robert Kennedy, Jr. is right about vaccines: A medically induced 'holocaust' is now upon us
» these government published studies ........ which clearly show vaccines cause Autism.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Chemtrail Awareness :: Vaccines-
Jump to: