Chemtrail Awareness
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Chemtrail Awareness

The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch and do nothing - Albert Einstein
 
HomePortalLatest imagesRegisterLog in
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
May 2024
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
CalendarCalendar
Similar topics

 

 Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse?

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Admin
Admin



Posts : 8049
Join date : 2012-05-29
Location : Manchester UK

Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse? Empty
PostSubject: Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse?   Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse? Icon_minitimeFri 17 Aug 2012, 07:59


Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse?







Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse? Chemo_child
Sayer Ji, Contributor
Activist Post

Mandatory chemotherapy for your child. The concept is horrific. But it is not just a concept. It has already happened
and is still happening, which is why I am writing this article. We need
to sound the alarm about this disturbing trend that, despite recent
mainstream media references to a case of court-coerced chemotherapy, is
still largely going unnoticed and/or unrecognized for what it really is:
a human rights violation of the worst kind.

Moreover, as it involves our children who can not rightly advocate for themselves, we need to speak up and act on their behalf.

Court-Ordered Pediatric Chemotherapy Calls Into Question Who Has Parental Authority

Were it not for J.D. Heyes' Aug. 13th article
for NaturalNews.com titled "Court forces chemo on eight-year-old
Minnesota girl despite family's desire to use alternative medicine," and
the CBS Minnesota article from Aug. 8th reporting on the matter, I would probably not be aware of this ongoing parental and human rights atrocity.

As reported by CBS, a Twin Cities family's 8-year-old daughter, Sarah, who had recently had 90 percent of a brain tumor surgically removed and was suffering from typical side effects from follow-up chemotherapy,
such as nausea, sore throat, loss of weight and hair, was ordered by
her doctors to continue for one more year of chemotherapy. Her parents,
who wished to search out less toxic treatment alternatives, were
contacted by child protective services when the child's doctors
determined her survival was being compromised each day she went without
further chemotherapy treatment.

According to CBS, "The Minnetonka family was ordered
to court and was told if they did not work with them on a treatment
plan, they would lose custody of Sarah." Subsequently, "The court and
Parisian family eventually reached an agreement on a treatment plan
which includes some chemotherapy, but "it's going to include a dose
that is not going to send her tipping over the edge," Connors said."


But What If Chemotherapy Is Not "Therapeutic" At All?

There is a disturbing subtext to this story that will likely never get
addressed by any mainstream media outlet, which, incidentally, is why
the alternative media is so important. As the saying goes, a text
without a context is a pretext. The problem is that conventional
treatment with chemotherapy and radiation, and not the cancer to which
it is being applied, is often the primary cause of the accelerated death
of the patient.*

I often look up commonly used chemoagents
by their material data safety sheet (MSDS) to ascertain just how toxic
they are, and what I invariably find is quite disturbing. These MSDSs
are federally mandated to be provided to the public by the manufacturers
of chemicals and drugs to which the public will be exposed, either by
accident or intention, e.g. prescribed chemicals. They contain
toxicological risk assessments based on acute lethality in an animal
model that reveal how dangerous these chemicals actually are. We know
from these studies that chemotherapy drugs are acutely lethal to humans
in the sub-gram dosage range and are often classified as carcinogenic.

Tamoxifen,
for instance, a first-line treatment for breast cancer for well over 40
years, is classified by the World Health Organization and American
Cancer Society as a human carcinogen. Or, 5-fluorauracil,
one of the world's best-selling oncology drugs is so toxic that, based
on its MSDS LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of test animals) rating, when
administered at a dosage equivalent to the weight of 3 pennies
(approximately 7.5 grams), is deadly enough to kill 50% of the adult
humans given it, within one dose.

Children As Canaries in the Chemical Coal Mine

Children are already uniquely susceptible to the genotoxicity of
synthetic chemicals because of the relatively faster rate at which their
cells replicate in the normal course of their fast-paced bodily
development, as well as their less developed detoxification systems.
Indeed, in a groundbreaking report released by the President's Cancer
Panel in 2010, in which our government agencies were indicted for
"failing to carry out their responsibilities," childhood cancers
overall, especially childhood leukemia and brain cancer, were found to
be increasing at an alarming rate relative to most types of cancers in
adult populations.

Chemical and radiation exposures are likely the primary reason for this
observed discrepancy. This is why the use of conventional chemotherapy
agents in children is so disturbing, since the very mechanism of action
of most of these agents is to target cells that replicate faster,
irrespective of whether they are malignant or benign. The collateral
damage, in other words, is usually devastating, and cancer recurrence
virtually guaranteed in a large number of cases not in spite of, but
because of the treatment given.

Keep in mind that tens of thousands of children diagnosed with cancer
each year are being pressured into being "treated" with chemotherapy as
their only alternative. It is one thing to be falsely marketed to, or
having the science misrepresented, or being told by a doctor that if you
do not choose to take this chemical you will die much sooner. It is
another to be told that your very own flesh and blood – your children,
for God's sake – can be taken from you, because you did not want to see
them poisoned to death for a condition like cancer, which is often
caused by lifetime cumulative exposures to chemicals/poisons.

If You Don't Know How Your Chemicals Work It's A Human Experiment

This
is why we have the medical ethical principle of informed consent. This
is why human experimentation after the Second World War, and the horrors
of the Nazi death camps, was explicitly rejected in the adoption of a
medical ethical code that required voluntary consent before being
subject to experimental drugs.

Mind you, most oncologists and the manufacturers that peddle them have
no idea what the chemotherapy agents they use are actually doing to
their patient's bodies -- which is the very definition of experimental
medicine, making informed consent impossible.

In fact, much of the research available on the true nature of cancer, especially research on cancer stem cells, indicates that chemotherapy and radiation are not only are a miserable failure, but actually make the cancer far more malignant. Pediatric cancer stem cells have recently been characterized as a key factor in chemoresistance and radioresistance, especially in brain cancers, the #1 form of childhood cancer.

Who Owns Your Body, Your Child's Body Really?

Furthermore, who has, or should have, the ultimate authority in making
these decisions about your child's body? If it is not you – the parent –
and it is the State, or a privatized medical establishment which is
seamlessly intertwined with it, or multinational corporations who
defraud the government and the medical institutions with checkbook
science for their patented, highly toxic nostrums,
then are we not saying that our bodies, or our children's bodies are
not self-possessed? That they are property, merely chattel, as would be
the technical definition of the bodies of slaves?

Mandatory chemotherapy, from a human rights perspective, is no different
from mandatory vaccination. The same pathological thinking, and denial
of bodily self-possession is at play. What we are talking about here is a
medical establishment that has far more to do with control of the
populace than service to it.


If any treatment becomes compulsory, and that treatment by its very
nature violates every natural law within the human body, i.e. using
poisonous chemicals to suppress symptoms of chemical poisoning, then we
have entered a truly Orwellian phase where being sick is required of us,
as well as to maintain our parental rights, or even to be a parent,
lest the State tear our children away from us.

I reject this implied reality. I encourage you to do the same. Coercing
or forcing conventional chemotherapy on a child is abuse – nothing less.
Until the profound density of evidence supporting natural treatments for cancer become mainstream knowledge, the pseudo-scientific medical dictatorship
will continue to poison people to death while at the same moment
claiming to save their lives. If this sounds radical or revolutionary, I
assure you it is really simply a matter of observing and telling the
truth.

*Need proof of this? Read: Chemo and Radiation Actually Make Cancer More Malignant or the new book Cancer Killers: The Cause Is The Cure


Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/is-mandatory-pediatric-chemo.html
Back to top Go down
 
Is Mandatory Pediatric Chemo Institutionalized Child Abuse?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Child abuse
» new 'animal abuse' laws
» 15 Years Old Girl Survive Pizzagate Satanic Rituals Abuse Pt 1 & 2

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Chemtrail Awareness :: Vaccines-
Jump to: