30 Year Cover-Up of Vaccine Dangers Exposed in UK Government Transcripts

30 Year Cover-Up of Vaccine Dangers Exposed in UK Government Transcripts


An
extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative
medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official
transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the
supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug
industry connections.

A Freedom of Information Act filing by a doctor in the UK, has
revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government
experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US, and many other countries.

No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and
vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug
regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are
generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to
which an individual may never be exposed. This, according to the FDA,
places extra emphasis on vaccine safety.

Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that
new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are
approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to
promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and
efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant.
Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it
should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being
subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known
or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description
of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants
are involved, full consent
with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.

Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole
purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination
schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or
misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health
(DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)
reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such
practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of
protecting the national vaccination program.

As
a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH,
many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed
the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse
reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It
would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH
neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent
concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not
only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki
Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also,
their own Code of Practice.

This is what everyone has always known but could never prove before
now. Pass this information on to others so they can see what goes on in
Government health committees behind locked doors.


The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the
Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and
that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on
strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at
which such
controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly
available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the
Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted
in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and
disturbing
lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the
text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release
under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH
(Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint
Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992.

In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:

1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing
vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were
identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no
action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from
public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public
and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;

2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination
criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and
unresolved safety issues;

3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to
make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in
conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;

4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;

5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;

6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of
questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule,
on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;

7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;

Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of
relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically
unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at
risk of severe long-term neurological damage.

Dr. Tomlijenovic explains; for instance, how JCVI has known since as
early as 1981 that the measles vaccine, which is part of the
government’s official vaccine schedule, is linked to long-term
neurological damage and death. She also outlines, with full citations,
evidence showing that JCVI has long been aware that many of scheduled
vaccines cause permanent brain damage in children, but have continued to
promote those vaccines anyway.



Educated
parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue
living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that
vaccines – full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal
material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80
(a sterilizing agent) – are a miracle of modern medicine.

A Freedom of Information Act filing in the US with the CDC by a
doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC knows
about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days.
Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court and the CDC argued it
does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn
over the documents on September 30th, 2011.

The US CDC is an unreliable source of information. They constantly
grossly exaggerate death and disease figures to promote vaccines. The UK
Department of Health does the same. Both for example have claimed flu
causes thousands of deaths each year but in fact it does not. They do
that to promote the flu vaccine, which the international Cochrane
Collaboration, which publishes medical research into the accuracy of
claims like that, has shown that the flu vaccine is not effective.

On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the
Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was
proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it
to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow
government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some document
“non-existent.”



A short summary of the most important arguments that support NON-VACCINATION:

• Vaccines contain a combination of at least 39 different highly toxic metals, cancer
  causing substances, toxic chemicals, live and genetically modified
  viruses, bacteria, contaminated serum containing animal viruses and
  foreign genetic material, extremely toxic de-contaminants and adjuvants,
  untested antibiotics, none of which can be injected without causing any
  harm. Vaccine contaminants have included bovine (cow),
  avian (chicken) and monkey viruses and bacteria such as streptococcus
  in the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine [Pediatrics, Vol. 75, No. 2, Feb 1985] and Serratia marcesens in the influenza vaccines [2004 influenza season].
  

• There is no scientific study to determine whether vaccines have really prevented diseases. Rather disease graphs show vaccines have been introduced at the end of epidemics when
  the disease was already in its last stages. In case of Small Pox the
  vaccine actually caused a great spurt in the incidence of disease before
  public outcry led to its withdrawal.
  

• There are no long-term studies on vaccine safety.
  Very short-term tests are carried out where the vaccinated subjects are
  checked against another group who are given another vaccine. Technically
  the tests should be carried out against a non-vaccinated group. No one
  really knows what protocols are followed at such industry based or
  industry sponsored trials.
  

• The mercury, aluminum and live viruses in vaccines may be behind the huge epidemic of autism (1
  in 110 in the USA), a fact that has been admitted by the US Vaccine
  Court. About 83 suspected cases of vaccines causing autism have been
  awarded compensation.
  

• Both the Small Pox and the Oral Polio Vaccine are made from monkey serum. This serum has helped many monkey viruses to enter the human blood stream. Out of these, the only researched virus, SV 40, has been found to be cancerous.
  These viruses continue to be in the vaccines. The presence of SV 40 in
  various human cancers has been demonstrated. Today it is known that the
  virus is being passed on to future generations as its presence in the
  mother’s milk and human sperms has been established.
  

• The number of polio cases was declining before the widespread administration of the Salk vaccine.
  Cases which had previously been reported as polio are now reported as
  meningitis. The risk of contracting polio from the live virus vaccine is
  greater than the risk of acquiring the disease from naturally occurring
  viruses.
  

• Many doctors argue that diseases during childhood are due to the body exercising its immune system.
  Suppressing these diseases causes the immune system to remain
  undeveloped causing the various autoimmune disorders in adults like diabetes and arthritis that have become epidemics today.
  

• Vaccines suppress the natural immunity and the body does not have natural antibodies anymore. The mother’s milk therefore does not contain natural antibodies and can no longer protect the child against illnesses.
  

• In the USA vaccine adverse effects are recorded and the Government
  offers compensation of millions of dollars to victims (the most recent
  case in its Vaccine Court may have received upto $200 million in
  damages). The courts in the USA have paid nearly $ 2 billion in damages so far.
  

• Vaccines try to create humoral (blood related immunity) whereas it has been found that immunity is developed at various levels: humoral, cellular, and organ specific. We still do not know enough about the human immune system and therefore should not interfere with it.
  

• In addition to childhood vaccination, new “hypes” like the Swine
  Flu, Bird Flu, Gardasil for HPV virus and the annual flu vaccine are
  continuing the to damage people’s health all throughout their life. Yves
  Thomas, the head of the National Influenza Centre in Geneva said that, “The
  debate and the arguments that surrounded the A(H1N1) influenza
  virus two years ago have sharpened public mistrust toward the seasonal flu vaccine.” In 2010, the World Health Organisation (WHO) was
  accused of dramatizing worldwide influenza cases in order to result in
  much higher vaccine sales since many countries had signed contracts with
  a stipulation to automatically buy vaccines when the WHO gave the
  highest alert level.
  

A Few Questions To Ask Your Doctor

Don’t
let yourself intimidated by medical doctors, they are NOT Gods and they
surely are misinformed, many of them are corrupted or don’t want to
acknowledge the dangers of vaccines. Most schools will offer you a
waiver if you ask for one. There is NO law that can deny you that.
Exemptions are typically for people who have compromised immune systems,
allergies to the components used in vaccinations, or strongly held
objections. All states but West Virginia and Mississippi allow religious
exemptions, and twenty states allow parents to cite personal or
philosophical objections. Get yourself educated on the matter, it’s
about the life of your child!

ASK QUESTIONS like these:

1. What are the serious negative health effects that these vaccines can generate? Are the risks worth the benefits?

2. Dr. Michel Odent has linked asthma to the whooping cough vaccine. Have you read his research? What do you think?

3. Professor Wakefield (UK) has linked autism and Chrones disease to
the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. What do you think? What
evidence do you have to back up your opinions?

4. Why is the same dose of vaccines given to a two month old as for a 5 year old?

5. Are you aware that Japan changed the start time for vaccinating
from 3 months to two years and straight away their SIDS rate plummeted?

6. Do you believe in herd immunity? If so, how is it that 98% of
U.S.A. children are vaccinated yet they still have outbreaks of these
diseases?

7. Most diseases were already 90% gone before any vaccines were
introduced. If this is so, how can vaccines be applauded for diseases
ceasing, especially when there were no vaccines for some diseases like
bubonic plague and scarlet fever?

8. How can the Tetanus vaccine induce immunity, when contracting the disease naturally does not give immunity?

9. If the so-called diphtheria vaccine, which is in fact a toxoid,
works against the toxin produced by the bacteria, and not against the
bacteria itself, then how did this “vaccine” help in the decline in
diphtheria?

To read and download the full 45 page report and its evidence by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD see the link below.

Read & Download Full Report.

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination





Source:-

http://thearrowsoftruth.com/30-year-cover-up-on-vaccine-dangers-exposed-in-uk-government-transcripts/