Ebola Virus: The Global Elite’s Bio-Weapon Scheme for 90 Percent Depopulation
Susanne Posel,
ContributorActivist PostThe Ebola virus
mysteriously appeared in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1976 and has sporadically
reappeared in the area without explanation ever since. Mainstream
medical professional believe that eating monkeys who are infected with
Ebola is the initial mode of transmission. However, this is accepted
speculation because the scientific community agrees that the natural
reservoir of the virus is unknown and therefore knowledge of
transmission is only hypothesized.
In July of this year, a sudden outbreak of the Ebola virus surfaced,
killing 14 people. The World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Uganda’s Ministry of Health
came together to control the unexpected eruption.
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni made a formal
statement warning his citizens:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">I therefore appeal to you to be vigilant.
Avoid shaking of hands; do not take on burying somebody that has died
from symptoms which look like Ebola. Instead, call the health workers to
be the ones to do it. And avoid promiscuity because these sicknesses
can also go through sex.</blockquote>Dr. Paul Roddy,
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), a French charity, asserts that the
outbreak of the Ebola virus in Uganda has been stabilized, however an
additional
outbreak could
erupt in another location. Roddy believes that natives eating bush-meat
were the catalyst for spread. He assumes that monkeys who have eaten
infected bats, that were then consumed by Ugandans was the chain of
infection.
Eight days later, in the DRC, a
new strain of
the Ebola virus has surfaced according to medical volunteers from MSF.
It is not the same strain as was discovered in Uganda.
This new epidemic is being monitored because “not every person who
develops the disease will develop clear symptoms that are recognized as
Ebola. For the moment it seems that there are not that many cases but
the exact number of cases is unknown,” said Anja de Weggheleire,
representative of MSF.
Overseen by the US Department of Defense (DoD) under the
Transformational Medical Technologies program (TMT) of the Defense
Threat Reduction Agency and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have
spent millions of dollars conducting
scientific research into
the Ebola virus, its potential for being turned into a bio-weapon and
certain vaccine efforts through two drug corporations,
Massachusetts-based
Sarepta Therapeutics and
Tekmira Pharmaceuticals of Canada. Then the funding was abruptly cut.
The
TMT creates relationships with
private sector biotech firms, pharmaceutical corporations and academic
institutions, as well as other government agencies to advance biological
warfare, research viral and biological weapons and estimate threat
levels of all biological agents based on ability to infect and
effectiveness of devastation.
The DoD suddenly stopped funding Ebola vaccine research through these
two corporations due to financial constraints. With the sporadic nature
of Ebola outbreaks, combined with the absolute deadly nature of the
virus, it was a hard sell to large pharmaceutical corporations because
it “isn’t a huge customer base and big pharma is obviously interested in
big profits. So these niche products which are important for biodefense
are really driven by small companies,” according to Larry Zeitlin,
president of Mapp Biophamracueticals, who is developing therapies to
combat Ebola.
Mysteriously, microbiologists
and virologists who were involved with research into immunology and
bioweapons have either gone missing or found dead over two decades. Some
of these scientists had ties to the Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
the NIH, the DoD – just to name a few. While the number of experts
involved in infectious disease research having died under questionable
circumstances has risen exponentially, the US government has remained
non-chalant.
In November of 2002, DynCorp was
given a
$322 million contract to develop, produce and store vaccines for the
DoD. DynCorp has been connected to PROMIS, a software program designed
to identify and target specific individuals for operations known only to
the US government.
One of the most shocking calls for depopulation came from Dr. Eric R.
Pianka, scientist at the University of Texas back in 2006. Pianka was
speaking to
an audience of fellow scientists, students, and professors when he
proclaimed that 90% of the world’s population needed to be killed using a
weaponized form of the Ebola virus. He stated that an airborne version
of Ebola would be more effective than the HIV/AIDS virus has been since
its
release in 1979 because of the speed in which the victim dies.
If Pianka’s nightmare scenario were to be carried out, how could it be done with the most efficiency and impact?
During the hype over possible 2012 Olympic Games terrorist schemes, the Lieutenant Colonel Brian Fahy
advised the
UK government that it was “feasible” that drones equipped with
biological weapons could be remote-controlled and aimed over the skies
of London during the Games. Fahy said:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can be put in
a backpack. They come in all sorts of sizes and it’s feasible they
could be filled with something noxious and flown by remote-control.</blockquote>In
preparation for the possibility, Elite soldiers wore biochemical suits,
gloves and masks during training exercises provided by a top-secret
military research facility in Porton Down, Wilshire. Fahy explains:
<blockquote class="tr_bq">We have worked up a comprehensive plan to
protect against the potential hijacking of a commercial airliner down to
slow-moving microlights or radio-controlled planes.</blockquote>Thanks to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), 6 national drone test sites were
established to
coincide with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcement
that by 2015 at least 30,000 drones will be in American skies surveying
US citizens in the name of safety, according to Janet Napolitano.
President Obama signed the
FAA Modernization and Reform Act in February of this year, demanding that the FAA “integrate operation of drones” into National Airspace by 2015.
These drones will be in civilian airspace, with “the potential for invasive surveillance of daily activities,”
says House Representative Ed Markey.
Just last June, researchers at the University of Texas
demonstrated to officials at the DHS how drones could be hacked into through their navigation systems.
By sending a false Global Positioning System (GPS) signal the drones were tricked into taking a different course.
To infect a large amount of people (like the population of a large US
city) with a bio-weapon like the Ebola virus, drones could be used to
spray over-head with ease. Because of the immediacy of infection, the
population of cities affect would experience a dramatic reduction nearly
instantly. In fact, it would take nearly a week for officials to even
respond to this type of pandemic and by that time, thousands of
Americans would be have succumbed to the Ebola virus.
Because of the effectiveness of the mortality rate of the Ebola virus,
it is the perfect bio-weapon. And if combined with the recent
implementation of drones in US skies, could this be a combination we
should be concerned about?
Globalists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates have already stated publicly
that they want a significant amount of the world’s population reduced –
even as far as by 90% in the name of climate change and reallocation of
resources. How could they accomplish such a feat without the aid of a
bio-weapon? And furthermore, how could they ensure that large enough
amounts of the population are exposed to the bio-weapon for maximum
effect?
Perhaps aerial drones equipped with the Ebola virus would be flown over
American cities, then the global Elite could sit back and wait. Once the
virus has killed the majority of the population, the next agenda for
global governance can unfold.
Source:-
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/ebola-virus-global-elites-bio-weapon.html